TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

A Focus Group Discussion (FGD) is a qualitative research technique consisting of a structured discussion and used to obtain in-depth information from a group of people about a particular topic.

Oral Polio Vaccine is a live attenuated vaccine, is to be given by mouth. Less immunogenic and therefore more doses are required(minimum 6).

D7p can refer to a big red button.

Just to add some other flavors.

Keep up the great work, it is appreciated by most here.

P

Spreadsheet updates:

Unanswered Q 20180801

Q posts pictures V7.7 20180801 from 1201 to 1793

I will try to update with the latest 7 days POTUS tweets tomorrow!

And so to bed... Zzzz

a reply to: pheonix358

Thanks for the alternatives Phoenix!

a reply to: Whereismypassword

Fair enough. Let's ask the members of the Q community if they feel the same way. Do they feel that the President has condemned and denounced them as a group that incites violence against individuals? Or, rather, could Sarah's statement be viewed as a generality that nobody in their right mind would disagree with, including any reasonable member of the Q group?

In my opinion, she answered the question eloquently and with brilliance (as usual), and with a pointed warning and reminder to any member of the Q group that the President does not condone violence. Any member of the Q group - or any other group - who does commit a violent act ought to be met with the full force of the law - and rightly so. That seems to me more like the message that she wanted to convey - a very strong one, indeed, that appears to go hand-in-hand with Q's warning that Qsters ought to "handle with care" their newfound mainstream notoriety.

Like I said earlier, it's time for all Qster's to put their adult pants on, beginning with joining the President and Sarah in supporting their non-violent revolution, non violently, and condemning anyone who identifies as a Qster who does commit a violent act, or anyone who does incite violence, and shun them, oust them from their midst.

That's what the movement needs to do in order to gain respect and credibility in the eyes of the mainstream.

well, there goes your support from Gorka

twitter.com...

"Lunacy.

Sheer LUNACY."

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Joecanada11

Theres millions of people going to qanon.pub and thats just 1 site. Over 100 million use 4chan

So guess what... You really dont know

Take a look at these Global website rankings....

In March 2018 Qanon.pub was around 960,000 in Global rank.....now it's #10,126!

But it's a LARP that no one follows.....

That's just one Q related site.

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, some would no doubt see Trump's re-election as a bad thing. We'll see if they become the majority in November.

1794 is up.


Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c1bb83 No.2405745 📁
Aug 1 2018 23:36:07 (EST)
FISA
FISA
FISA
[20]
Public disclosure.
Impossible to defend.
ILLEGAL.
Re: MSM
“Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself.”
Q



Closer and closer we get to the goal posts.
Love the last quote. It will go down in history as will the entirety of the Q movement.

Love it!

P

a reply to: CanadianMason

Nothing Burger the way the question was posed.

I saw somewhere (here) that the guy holding the Blacks for Trump sign had some violence in their past.

So Meh.....

Oh wait, we are supposed to be anti-Jewish.

originally posted by: pheonix358
1794 is up.


Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c1bb83 No.2405745 📁
Aug 1 2018 23:36:07 (EST)
FISA
FISA
FISA
[20]
Public disclosure.
Impossible to defend.
ILLEGAL.
Re: MSM
“Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself.”
Q



Closer and closer we get to the goal posts.
Love the last quote. It will go down in history as will the entirety of the Q movement.

Love it!

P

Does that mean the 3 fisa apps on Carter Page or that 3 people had Fisa's on them?

I was just reading an old NBC report on Manafort, and NBC said he was the subject of a FISA.
Was he and when?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
Yes, some would no doubt see Trump's re-election as a bad thing. We'll see if they become the majority in November.

It doesn't matter if they are or are not the majority.

For the sake of argument, if they are, I'm sure some will see that as a bad thing. I don't see why that would be a controversial statement.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Is the Clinton/Spielberg show going to be called "Rehabilitating Big Brother - the Cabal Detox"?

No, it's "Zen and the Art of Falling Gracefully".

Think he just toll us that MSN just put their foot in it

and their going to smell like it LOL



From Q Drop

originally posted by: Bill1960
And to think, just two short years ago I was a "deplorable". Now, I'm a toothless, despicable, dangerous, hillbilly. MSM words not mine. Never mind my AS, BS and 2 MS degrees. My mother would be proud.

Your mother will also find out that you are now a violent anti-semite who is in league with the Russian mafia. Oh the horror.

And all that for nothing more than asking a few questions about corruption.

a reply to: pheonix358


I get the feeling that the number "[20]" following FISA FISA FISA is important. Will look around to see if anyone has decoded this latest Q post yet.

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Trillium

Do you know what the red x means beside someone's name I'm seeing quite a few of those on Twitter.

Social media right-wing Republicans users place a large red X surrounding their names to protest Twitter latest policies of shadow banning specific users due to their political views. (Shutterstock)
By Randa Darwish

Following lots of "Right Wing Republicans" are we?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: pheonix358


I get the feeling that the number "[20]" following FISA FISA FISA is important. Will look around to see if anyone has decoded this latest Q post yet.

I Was Wondering About That As well.

a reply to: nowayreally

The man is a true Canadian Patriot, standing up for what he believes is the right thing to do, refusing to allow the government to force him to use words (compelled speech) that he doesn't feel comfortable using. He has risked a lot, a great man. I've read his first book, 'Maps of Meaning' and now I'm reading his second, 12 Rules. They are both very good.

a reply to: pavil

Yeah he was a member of the Yahweh ben Yahweh cult, and their website is a rightist conspiracy site, they say something about how the Cherokee were the real Nazis or something like that