TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: IAMTAT

how long before msm tries to doxx us?

a reply to: carewemust

Oh, you don’t have to tell me. Trust me....

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: IAMTAT

how long before msm tries to doxx us?

I thought about that today. Pretty sure thats what they want.

a reply to: IAMTAT

just as an interesting observation... the thread has slowed down a bit...

originally posted by: dashen
how long before msm tries to doxx us?

hungry for your fifteen minutes?

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: dashen
how long before msm tries to doxx us?

hungry for your fifteen minutes?

Hungry for attention?

originally posted by: eisegesis
Hungry for attention?

not now that you've obliged

a reply to: toysforadults


Certainly agree but lets ponder this from one of Q's recent posts 1787 (year the Constitution was ratified)


Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: b3ecc4 No.2391916


Aug 1 2018 12:15:09 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 3b30e7 No.2391787


Aug 1 2018 12:08:11 (EST)
>>2391757

Est. Number of Patriots reached?
Anonymous ID: 767c5e No.2391804


Aug 1 2018 12:09:10 (EST)
>>2391757
deletions a warning to Steyer?????
>>2391787
[WW]
Eyes on: 300-350mm
Tracking: 52-58mm
>>2391804
You didn't think 'common sense' was simply a coincidence did you?
Think email.
Think #1776.
But how did we know an article was going to be dropped later that night?
Q


Here's the keys:

Eyes on: 300-350mm - Number of people who have looked into Q
Tracking: 52-58mm - Number of people regularly following Q

Now lets compare that to the results of the 2016 Election:

61mm Voted for Hillary
60mm Voted for Trump

I kind of believe that the 58mm following Q are actually the adults in the room. It's pretty close to Q followers being able to reelect Trump on their own. But I digress, we have a 2018 midterm to get through. Those same 58mm need to come out in mass in 97 days and stop these chuckleheads in their tracks.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The anti-Q bots are hitting the #Qanon twitter thread very heavily tonight.

Well NBC got hit pretty good today by Quster

NBC Twitter

a reply to: Bill1960

well.. I just start following a week or 2 ago so I'm probably not count and I will be voting without a doubt

a reply to: fiverx313

nope.
im just here for the memes maam

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Bill1960

well.. I just start following a week or 2 ago so I'm probably not count and I will be voting without a doubt

TFA

I see the numbers as a bit more esoteric in nature, though the can be seen in terms of voting I guess - though remember Q's strategic photo of the family kids don't vote.

The first numbers represent the numbers of folks WW who have in some way been positively effected by the Q process. That includes: Decoders, researchers, supporters, lurkers, as well as folks who are connected to them - kinda 6 degrees of separation. The example I'd use is several posters here mentioning their connections with family members sharing the topic but those members are not Qsters. This number also includes the Qteam gang toiling away on the front lines. Tracking=can be connected to Q.

The larger numbers are folks who's energy is aligned with the "great awakening" but are not necessarily aware of Q or the process. They count just as much but are identified in a different way. Eyes on = from above the world so to speak.

The numbers are very good, considering a few months ago 20mm was the count and the deadline of 11/11 set. Well done.

The thing I see as important is these number represent people who are not violent, polarized or rogue. Heart centered folks is the desired connective thread and I personally see that goal having been reached and it blows me away.

apnews.com...

People wore T-shirts with the letter emblazoned on the front. Others carried signs containing the letter: "Q WWG1WGA Trump 2020 Keep America Great! MSM is the enemy." Another held a dog-eared and slightly crumpled piece of paper in the air. It said, simply, "We are Q."

www.adweek.com...

Looking at the network overall, CNN held steady in prime time, both in total viewers (891,000) and in the A25-54 demo (297,000) in July 2018 vs. July 2017. But the network posted year-over-year audience losses when it came to the 24-hour day. This past month, CNN was -5 percent in total day viewers, and -11 percent in the A25-54 demo vs. July 2017. This is according to Nielsen live-plus-same-day data.

the average Joe Rogan Youtube video is doubling CNN ratings...

www.similarweb.com...

Infowars

www.similarweb.com...

CNN internet traffick however is much higher

www.google.com... es+listeners&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3877.7659.0.7748.29.14.0.0.0.0.699.1059.3-1j0j1.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..27.2.1059...0j0i20i263k1j0i10k1j0i22i30k1.0.DJ QmRP6fOlk

Apparently Alex has around 2 million listeners per week.

If Q has 58 million followers Q is CRUSHING the media and they are probably #ting their pants

www.similarweb.com...

7.9 mill for qanon.pub.... what sources are you guys using?

not sure if I'm allowed to show any 4chan info? but they are getting 104 million visitor's which is a BOATLOAD

And to think, just two short years ago I was a "deplorable". Now, I'm a toothless, despicable, dangerous, hillbilly. MSM words not mine. Never mind my AS, BS and 2 MS degrees. My mother would be proud.

Aug 1 2018 12:09:10 (EST)
>>2391757
deletions a warning to Steyer?????
>>2391787
[WW]
Eyes on: 300-350mm
Tracking: 52-58mm
>>2391804
You didn't think 'common sense' was simply a coincidence did you?
Think email.
Think #1776.
But how did we know an article was going to be dropped later that night?
Q


I don't believe that mm means millions, in fact it does not.

mm is a unit of measure being approx 1/25th of an inch.

It is a measurement in the metric system and anyone outside of the US knows this.
Except for US military ... they know the metric system.

Eyes on: 300-350mm is likely to refer to a zoom camera lens. A big one!
Tracking: 52-58mm is a small lens, but still a camera lens.

That is all I have on this ... but it is likely to be critical.

Well, I have caught up again. Good morning all.

P

a reply to: crankyoldman

hmm. I wonder if there's any ritual involved

a reply to: crankyoldman


Touché, that's what I meant by the adults in the room

a reply to: pheonix358

makes WAY more sense in that context, without a doubt you are right

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: crankyoldman

hmm. I wonder if there's any ritual involved

TFA,

No, no rituals of any kind. Unequivocal on that.

a reply to: toysforadults

Now if we can find a camera buff ... we could start guessing at what distances the observers are away from the quarry.

Why we need this info is beyond me at this point.

But hey, we all play catch up with Q.

P