TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: Aallanon

ok, sorry for the rant.. But there have been several snarky comments aimed at me previously. Normally I ignore. Should have followed my own advise tonight.

Excelon and Microsoft donated to Zero in 2012.

www.chicagotribune.com...

a reply to: pavil

Good idea!

This is bad ass.

a reply to: TomLawless

oooo.... yeah that may be it...

a reply to: Jusvistn

Not that it matters, but you're alright by me.

o7

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: Jusvistn

Not that it matters, but you're alright by me.

o7

Ditto.

Another example of 0's "integrity".

From the Daily Kos, no less. Can't attack the source.

A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks. Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.

www.dailykos.com...

a reply to: Aallanon

Yet...You....Believe...Everything...."Q"...And...Trump....Says

a reply to: Jusvistn

I look forward to reading your posts and opinions. please don't take what I wrote as a criticism of you.

a reply to: TomLawless

I just tried the last couple of Q id#'s in google "books" search and it came back with numerous pages and nothing of relevance.

Could it be that as Q researchers are posting, videos are being made and the like that google adds that to its search because of the link between Q and the posted research?

Will be interesting to see if the previously listed more relevant book titles show up in a few days after folks have had a chance to dig in some or if new ones do with along with narrowed results.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

You Don't know me . You don't know what i believe. But that doesn't stop you from creating an opinion of me and fitting it in to your little tiny Q rebellion. good luck with all that.

a reply to: Aallanon

Like you have been doing?

a reply to: Jusvistn

I am incredibly uninformed about the Google algorithm. I wish I had an answer.




ETA!
I went ahead and dashed in the newest trip and came up with some very interesting titles just on the first page.

Did you see these titles?

www.google.com...!CbboFOtcZs&client=firefox-b-1&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTtfHUycDcAhWMy4MKHYBAAdcQ_AUICygC&biw=1366&bi h=635

a reply to: TomLawless

try Bing

a reply to: Aallanon

OH I don't, and I won't. Your comment wouldn't have hit me in such a sore spot if my scrolling finger wasn't working so well tonight.

After going back a few pages and seeing some of the other comments, I get where you are coming from. I have a really bad habit of reading this thread backwards.

No worries.

The book codes would not be the same as the code to identify the books

layers of security.

One marker points to the book.
a different marker points to the relevant text in said book.
a third might indicate a decode.

I'm telling you guys there is something up with the multiple letters in Q posts maybe page #'s?

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: e5c60e No.2265105 📁
Jul 24 2018 13:19:49 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 6d522a No.2264981 📁
Jul 24 2018 13:12:28 (EST)
>>2264962
+
www.youtube.com...📁
>>2264981
There is no greater [current] threat to the American people than the FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
#ControlledMSM
Study Nazism.
Compare/contrast ANTIFA.
Compare/contrast SOCIALISM push.
Push for REBIRTH.
Who financed then?
Who is financing now?
Dark to LIGHT.
GOOD WINS.
Q

take this post,

2 C's, 2W's in succession, it's an indicator.

qanon.pub...

You think.... So you're a ...


No you said.... So that means everyone thinks.....

I think you are a...

And on and on.

Pretty sure that's thread sliding. Hard to follow all these new drops with so much chatter.

Stop caring about what the other person assumes. Focus on information. Connect or disprove. Stop getting triggered or triggering others, please.

You don't have to argue with trolls to help the lurkers, they're perfectly capable of self discernment. Promise.

So Q's getting ready to change trip code? I see him testing device security.

a reply to: EbbNFlow

Roger that.

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: Jusvistn

I am incredibly uninformed about the Google algorithm. I wish I had an answer.

I know nothing about Goog algorithms, I might not have even been putting the correct stuff to search. I tried the trip code with the id and got a blog post, but nothing on books. just the id# returned pages and pages of results, some with chapters and page #'s listed.

But on that thought, even if the books were to be picked up after the fact, it's still intriguing to try Pavil's idea of searching the comments.

a reply to: EbbNFlow

yeah but he used random lettering not like a 1, 2, 3 fashion

I'm pretty sure he's dropping hints at the same time it would only make sense

there's other way's to verify device security/ function