TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: IAMTAT

I thought we were supposed to be arguing about a missile picture?
(sarc)

Perhaps someone will repeat the official 'helicopter' story another six times to bring us all back to the desired narrative for tonight.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I have to post repeatedly in this thread to try and cause drift. It's not working but I'll keep doing it because it's how I make my bones.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: IAMTAT

I thought we were supposed to be arguing about a missile picture?
(sarc)

oh you mean...*brings up missles and says Q was lying then says other ppl are using missle talk as distraction?*

a reply to: tiredoflooking

So, after July, this

"July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.
Conspiracy no more.
Time to FEED.
Q"

becomes failed

a reply to: XAnarchistX

So Boring!

Maybe that's the truth the world will discover?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Don't trust the Navy now?

"In fact, Navy workers are wondering what it was, too.

"There's a lot of speculation around here," Mills said, suggesting it could be lens flare. "But it's definitely not a missile launch."

a reply to: Aallanon

Panic
Can you sense the panic
deflection
pain
failed

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Right ouroboros.

That's just what I said.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Not believing everything you are fed is the first step in denying ignorance.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

National security ...duh.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

Ah I see its bury your head in the sand time. This isn't about accepting an opinion. The facts have all been laid out for you.

The problem is, you've already been caught in a manipulative lie. You're wasting your time trying to convince people of anything since it's been proven that you can't be trusted.

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know if there is some kind of search algorithm that make those titles come up in a search? I mean, if that were the case, wouldn't there be like a gazillion book titles listed? More random stuff?

Seriously....Alice In Bloody Wonderland?

Why not just the original?

I think the whole "You have more than you know" thing is now rounding third and heading for home.

IDK...but it makes perfect sense as a clandestine medium for Q to Q comms.
The creativity at work within the Q system is next level brilliance.
Inspiring.
Reason, alone, to continue to follow and study.

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Have any of them been actually proven though, and not from "Q"



[

]

We have actual texts referring to a "insurance policy" to prevent a Trump Presidency?

What's your explanation of that or the meeting in "Andy's" office that no one seems to be able to remember or remember who actually was there?

a reply to: XAnarchistX

FB lost 120 billion
the head of CBS is being accused of sexual harassment
NK is denuclearizing (sp?)
Twitter down 19%
obama was proved to be spying

That's the last 3 days

have you heard?

That's pain

a reply to: TomLawless

Pretty sure this is a she, if anyone is on twitter, an invitation to this poster @triciawegmann77 to this thread might entice their participation.

I did the google book search thingy with one of the most recent posting IDs (267e20) and it gave me 2 pages of mostly books on nutrition, but a couple of others of interest as well.

Rel, I know you've done tons of work with the spreadsheet already, but would there be a way to script in an automated function that would search google books based on the Trip Codes and/or User IDs Q has used?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know if there is some kind of search algorithm that make those titles come up in a search? I mean, if that were the case, wouldn't there be like a gazillion book titles listed? More random stuff?

Seriously....Alice In Bloody Wonderland?

Why not just the original?

I think the whole "You have more than you know" thing is now rounding third and heading for home.

IDK...but it makes perfect sense as a clandestine medium for Q to Q comms.
The creativity at work within the Q system is next level brilliance.
Inspiring.
Reason, alone, to continue to follow and study.

Wonder if the Google Books reviews might have anything there. Look at the right time frames and odd reviews.

Just a thought

Hiding in plain sight.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Also there could be markers in the post to direct us to something specific in each book

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: IAMTAT

I thought we were supposed to be arguing about a missile picture?
(sarc)

I guess I didn't realize I was arguing. Q reposted the pic, there was a question, I added my 2¢ worth and there were a few more questions raised of which I was seeking verification so that I knew I had all available information.

comments like yours is why I rarely participate in this thread.

but that's just me. Carry on

a reply to: Jusvistn

Not you. You presenting cohesive points. You just chose to engage someone who is only looking to derail and argue in this thread.

My apologies no offence was meant.

More Excelon stuff.

They're involved in the U1 deal. Also linked to Loop Capital and Hussein.

It sounds like there were under the table deals to get Uranium into Iran. That's my gut feeling.

www.reuters.com...