It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tempter
If PermitPatty had a water-selling stand NEXT to this kid and mom, and SHE had to pay for a permit, does that change how this is viewed?
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: howtonhawky
I'm going to sell my contaminated water for .25 cents less than you.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: howtonhawky
My intent (as far as could be proven) would be to sell water.
Sure, I wouldn't stay open long nor likely to spend all my I'll gotten gains but was it worth the possible loss of life? Over water?
Point being some basic standards in the form of regulation do some good.
That's not to say any of my rambling apply to the op as the facts are rather light. Just a small hole in the thought of a wild west market.
originally posted by: MajorAce
If the blond had a permit to sell anything liquid on that corner , then she is in the right. if not then she should go work for the DMV.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: howtonhawky
And you just credibility.
Good day.
originally posted by: Starhooker
a reply to: howtonhawky
A permit for quality control and health standards. It's called first world standards.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: howtonhawky
No, permission to sell something and a permit fee which covers the expense of having to check and verify you are meeting safety standards.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: howtonhawky
No, we would not all die, false argument. Some of us would die, not all. Some of us would become sick, not all. That is on top of the problems we already have.