It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RichardPrice
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
The Chinese don't have the technology to compete with the US, yet.
And the Abrams is the best tank in the world.
[edit on 21-2-2005 by Hockeyguy567]
Uhmm the ChallengerII is generally accepted as the best Main Battle Tank in the world.
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
F-22s can carry only 6 missles,and Su-27s can carry 8 missles,so in conclusion Su-27s are better than F-22s
Originally posted by DeathAngel BR
The pro-merrikan stuff is strong on some people
Let's see. Maybe the J-10 can engage "only" 4 targets at once because it can only carry 4 active radar-homing missiles, unlike the 6 in the F-14? Well, the Gripen can too carry 4 ARH missile only, but it will give the F-15C a run for its money at BVR and WVR combat. Does this make the Gripen worst than the Eagle? NO.
Quit being blind fanboys.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Originally posted by DeathAngel BR
The pro-merrikan stuff is strong on some people
Let's see. Maybe the J-10 can engage "only" 4 targets at once because it can only carry 4 active radar-homing missiles, unlike the 6 in the F-14? Well, the Gripen can too carry 4 ARH missile only, but it will give the F-15C a run for its money at BVR and WVR combat. Does this make the Gripen worst than the Eagle? NO.
Quit being blind fanboys.
Who is counting missiles? As best as I can read, you are the first to make any refference to the quantity of missles carried vs capability.
And please whats with the "pro-merrikan" remark? Are you trying to say "Pro-American"? That a sad attempt at an insult against anothers national origin? I fail to find any reply on this thread that insults anothers country using distastefull refferences.
Last I recall we are comparing fighter planes, not insulting other posters countries. Deathangel, could you please keep this thread about the planes and not your personal agenda to slander AMERICANS? Your anti American agenda is not for this forum about aircraft. Please take it elswhere.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Who is counting missiles? As best as I can read, you are the first to make any refference to the quantity of missles carried vs capability.
And please whats with the "pro-merrikan" remark? Are you trying to say "Pro-American"? That a sad attempt at an insult against anothers national origin? I fail to find any reply on this thread that insults anothers country using distastefull refferences.
Last I recall we are comparing fighter planes, not insulting other posters countries. Deathangel, could you please keep this thread about the planes and not your personal agenda to slander AMERICANS? Your anti American agenda is not for this forum about aircraft. Please take it elswhere.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Originally posted by skippytjc
Who is counting missiles? As best as I can read, you are the first to make any refference to the quantity of missles carried vs capability.
And please whats with the "pro-merrikan" remark? Are you trying to say "Pro-American"? That a sad attempt at an insult against anothers national origin? I fail to find any reply on this thread that insults anothers country using distastefull refferences.
Last I recall we are comparing fighter planes, not insulting other posters countries. Deathangel, could you please keep this thread about the planes and not your personal agenda to slander AMERICANS? Your anti American agenda is not for this forum about aircraft. Please take it elswhere.
Your pro-american aganeda is quite "sad" too.. The statements yo umake
"at the bottom of the Sea with all missiles attached"
etc etc.. are more insulting than "merrikkan"..please note and refrain from such statements and the "insulting" you observe will also stop..
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
I find the term "merrikan" or however you choose to spell it, a deliberate attempt at an insult, with the intent to personally insult me. Personal or hateful remarks are against the TOS of this website. Making points about a nations aircraft, no matter how abrupt, is not an insult to a person and you guys clearly have a hard time seeing the difference and have chosen to make things personal.
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
You guys clearly have an personal agenda to insult Americans due to your jealousy over the US's and other nations superior aircraft.
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
The next author to post a reply on this thread making any derogatory statements with the intent to insult will get reported as a personal attack against me and my fellow Americans. Your "merrikans" remark isn’t any better than any other racial slur and I take it as such. You are warned.
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
Oh, and BTW: My wife is Chinese, my son is half Chinese, and her entire family is of course, Chinese.
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
And that still doesn’t change the fact that the J10 is totally incapable of competing with most of Russia's and the West’s fighters.
Its a fair copy of an F16. That’s it. Nothing more.
You may add Brazil and Ukraine to that sig of yours.
2004
February 25 – Fighter Squadrons VF-11 and VF-143, flying F-14B Tomcats, launched from USS George Washington's (CVN 73) flight deck during a routine deployment supporting Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom to conduct an historic missile shoot. The Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 7 aircraft fired 17 live Phoenix missiles onto a range over the Arabian Sea in two separate waves.
July 15 – Last AIM-54 was shot by VF-213 Cag-8; Pilot- LCDR Mark Tankersley and RIO- LTJG Scott Timmester.
Originally posted by DeathAngel BR
You're an idiot.
Originally posted by skippytjc-stupid-merrikan
Originally posted by DeathAngel BR
You're an idiot.
TOS:
"2.) You will not behave in an abusive and/or hateful manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
"Violation of any aspect of the Terms and Conditions of use are subject to our Actions for general abuse and violations. Or, in extreme cases, immediate banning of your username and IP from the discussion board. In all disputes, the decisions of myself and administrative staff are final."
[edit on 23-2-2005 by skippytjc]