The Trump Doctrine Defined: ‘We’re America, B*tch’

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: introvert


Sure. What does that have to do with the topic?

Basically your replies that suggest Trump has little to do with anything that looks successful, always something else as the cause.

Was I incorrect?

Still, your rant about the Left had nothing to do with it. Except to make you look silly.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: introvert

You have not provided one example of a policy he created.

He got conservative judge Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court. Consumer confidence is at an all-time high which also leads to a strong economy and the lowest unemployment in 50 years. He created more than a million jobs by undoing 800 Obama regulations that also has led to mortgage applications for new homes being at a 7 year high. Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Promoted investments from major businesses to build back here in America. Reduced illegal immigration by over 70% and is working on his wall. Changed the rules of engagement against ISIS, and drafted a plan to defeat them. Worked to reduce the cost of the F-35 fighter jets. Imposed a five year lobbying plan. Reduced tax reform plan. He’s renegotiating NAFTA and withdrew from the Trans Pacific Partnership thus keeping jobs here.

Just a few off the top of my head...

2 Things. For balance we need some liberal and some conservative judges. You want all of one or all of the other. That's not balance. So based on that his supreme court nomination is neither good nor bad. But this is an issue...

Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

a reply to: Gothmog

The same can be said of your opinion. It's meaningless compared to what the US really needs.

See how that works?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert

sticking your fingers in your ears isn't a valid argument.

True. Good thing I did not do that.

Give me real examples, not platitudes.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gothmog

The same can be said of your opinion. It's meaningless compared to what the US really needs.

See how that works?

Ahh , the old I know you are , what am I debacle
Takes me back to grammar school and the playground
Thanks for the memories.

But , do you have an intellectual rebuttal ?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gothmog

The same can be said of your opinion. It's meaningless compared to what the US really needs.

See how that works?

Ahh , the old I know you are , what am I debacle
Takes me back to grammar school and the playground
Thanks for the memories.

But , do you have an intellectual rebuttal ?

Exactly the point I tried to make.

We can both spit meaningless, childish rhetoric that holds no value.

Your post holds no value because it states that my opinion is invalid because of your personal assumptions about what the US needs and even throws in a "whatabout Obama" for good measure.

Glad you caught that. Though, I suspect the overall point is about to go over your head.

originally posted by: introvert


Was I incorrect?

Still, your rant about the Left had nothing to do with it. Except to make you look silly.

Well first you are incorrect...

Second I guess you do not see the hypocrisy in that Trump is to blame for every failure or even possible future failures while also considered having zero impact in anything positive.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Gothmog

The same can be said of your opinion. It's meaningless compared to what the US really needs.

See how that works?

Ahh , the old I know you are , what am I debacle
Takes me back to grammar school and the playground
Thanks for the memories.

But , do you have an intellectual rebuttal ?

Exactly the point I tried to make.

We can both spit meaningless, childish rhetoric that holds no value.

Your post holds no value because it states that my opinion is invalid because of your personal assumptions about what the US needs and even throws in a "whatabout Obama" for good measure.

Glad you caught that. Though, I suspect the overall point is about to go over your head.

Yet , still no intellectual rebuttal.
Just , I dont agree

Elucidate , elaborate....

Elucidate

make (something) clear; explain.

Elaborate

develop or present (a theory, policy, or system) in detail.

Defs by Google

Dont reply if it is just going to be more tripe , please.

originally posted by: amazing




Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

The problem is coal is not dead, but Obama wanted to put it in a early grave. The gas vehicle will go the way of the horse some time in the near future, but if we forced it today into an early grave it would not be good, as example.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: amazing




Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

The problem is coal is not dead, but Obama wanted to put it in a early grave. The gas vehicle will go the way of the horse some time in the near future, but if we forced it today into an early grave it would not be good, as example.

But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: amazing




Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

The problem is coal is not dead, but Obama wanted to put it in a early grave. The gas vehicle will go the way of the horse some time in the near future, but if we forced it today into an early grave it would not be good, as example.

But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

Take a look at the toxic by products of green energy as promoted by Obama and what was found when Solyndra went belly up after stealing tax payer funding.

Green energy at this point in time is anything but green for those who are honest enough to look at the toxic by products produced in the process of going green.

originally posted by: amazing


But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

Depends...a car pollutes every time you drive...should we go to the electric car today? We are not ready to go "green" yet. When costs come down, performance goes up then we will be ready. If we had a electric car today that cost less than 35k, went 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, got 400 miles on a charge and could recharge in 20 mins the gas car would quickly be one foot in the grave.

Obama era wanted to push to quickly into Green at the expense of all of us one way or another. The end result was that his green wasn't all that green and the cost was prohibitive with very low gains.

a reply to: Butterfinger
I SURE THE HELL HOPE SO.!!! We needed a hard core business man in this position.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

You might be

See, this is yet ANOTHER false statement.

I find it terribly hard to believe what someone says when they insist on continuing to get the facts wrong.

What facts? The fact that you hate Trump?

Yeah, we learned that one a couple of years ago.

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: amazing




Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

The problem is coal is not dead, but Obama wanted to put it in a early grave. The gas vehicle will go the way of the horse some time in the near future, but if we forced it today into an early grave it would not be good, as example.

But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

Take a look at the toxic by products of green energy as promoted by Obama and what was found when Solyndra went belly up after stealing tax payer funding.

Green energy at this point in time is anything but green for those who are honest enough to look at the toxic by products produced in the process of going green.

First look up Solyndra.. it was part of a bigger program for all kinds of innovative things and it was a loan and they paid it all back. No tax payer money lost.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert

sticking your fingers in your ears isn't a valid argument.

True. Good thing I did not do that.

Give me real examples, not platitudes.

Why? You wont even acknowledge that it was Trumps tax plan.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: amazing


But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

Depends...a car pollutes every time you drive...should we go to the electric car today? We are not ready to go "green" yet. When costs come down, performance goes up then we will be ready. If we had a electric car today that cost less than 35k, went 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, got 400 miles on a charge and could recharge in 20 mins the gas car would quickly be one foot in the grave.

Obama era wanted to push to quickly into Green at the expense of all of us one way or another. The end result was that his green wasn't all that green and the cost was prohibitive with very low gains.

Obama kind of targeted coal pollution. My opinion for any business is if it pollutes too much it needs to change. I'm okay if the solar industry had higher standards for pollution/emissions/recycling etc.

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: amazing




Ended the war on coal and caused a new mine for coal mining to open that will mine clean coal and he also put the miners back to work. Coal is a dying industry. We don't even need it any more.

The problem is coal is not dead, but Obama wanted to put it in a early grave. The gas vehicle will go the way of the horse some time in the near future, but if we forced it today into an early grave it would not be good, as example.

But there is really no need for coal. If there is a market for it then a mine can remain operational but Obama's regulations where more about pollution and again...if a coal company has to pollute to operate then it should close. I enjoy fishing, boating, swimming in rivers etc.

Take a look at the toxic by products of green energy as promoted by Obama and what was found when Solyndra went belly up after stealing tax payer funding.

Green energy at this point in time is anything but green for those who are honest enough to look at the toxic by products produced in the process of going green.

First look up Solyndra.. it was part of a bigger program for all kinds of innovative things and it was a loan and they paid it all back. No tax payer money lost.

If they were so innovative how did they go bankrupt?

Also, I tried finding how much they paid back and all I found was garbage from sites like Thinkprogess saying they were projecting that Solyndra was going to pay x amount of dollars back.

Nothing solid, just BS trying to protect Obama from being castrated for making a huge mistake.....

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

You don't really know what he does sitting at his desk alone. My "boss" is a brand. If you live in Austin, i guarantee you know his name. He sells himself, and a couple of our higher profile folks. BUt make no mistake...he is a shrewd and successful businessman, too.

please tell me he drives a big ass white cadillac eldo convertable with a big ass set o horns on the grizzle..!!??

but on topic he sounds like such a dick but i think its pretty funny at the same time. i prefer he did # a different way