It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Isurrender73
You do realize desalination is a viable option that requires no conservation on the part of the consumer?
If that were to happen then all those who scrambled to buy water rights would lose out......
originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: angeldoll
You do live here right? It's only a Beautiful Wonderful place to live if you make $250,000 a year .
originally posted by: lordcomac
The good news is that the rich who aren't fleeing the area (did anyone else see that 46% figure? WOW!) can afford to store water- and have a system that pulls 49.9 gallons into a big tank, and save up extra on days they don't need it so they can have it on days they do.
Not the tax payers though- they'll have to get a fine on laundry day.
originally posted by: Necrobile
a reply to: Gargoyle91
Interesting, so does that mean all those rich people can't water their lawns?? Or is this only for people who don't own mansions??
originally posted by: Guyfriday
We saw this during the fake energy crisis of the ENRON days where people put up with rolling brownouts. That is until people started to look at how much power was available vs that amount being used. That was when ENRON started to be exposed. This water crisis is that same thing, but only more rooted with politics and big farm owners.