They're Going After Hillary, Comey, Lynch, And Others in DOJ and FBI For Crimes

"I have zero doubt that it will get ugly one day. I also have zero doubt that the Conservatives will win. This is why the left is trying so hard to disarm us Americans, and change the laws. They know it too".


The day can't come soon enough.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Sure they're keeping it all from us.
Ha ha ha.
Come on people wake up.
No they're not.
There's no media black out. They are not going after Obama or Clinton or Lynch or Holder or who ever the hell else this fantasy loving crowd can think up.
They're going after trump.
Trump and trump alone.
Impeachment coming.
Maybe jail.

Lol

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

I'd be embarrassed to source Fox news after we learned that Hannity and trump discuss the next news cycle every night.
I mean really...

Hannity isn't a journalist and he doesn't run the news cycle at Fox. Actually the guy who runs their Breaking News division is Shephard Smith, who is a hardcore Trump-hater.

As usual, you posted without having even an inkling of a clue what you're talking about.

originally posted by: Plotus
"I have zero doubt that it will get ugly one day. I also have zero doubt that the Conservatives will win. This is why the left is trying so hard to disarm us Americans, and change the laws. They know it too".


The day can't come soon enough.

It was quoted from poncho1982

www.youtube.com...

The more you all engage the usuals, the more they comment their false claims. It's always damage control for them. Never anything of substance. Clintons, Obama's, and their entire cabal could be found guilty and they'd still blame Trump for everything.

I have been wondering for a while who the FBI Special Agent might be that is mentioned in this OIG report dated April 30, 2018.

oig.justice.gov...

This misconduct detailed in the summary could fit a few people in this thread. It is an SA who is now retired. It seems to fit one in particular, who I won't name for risk of... you know.

Unfortunately, it also says that there will be no criminal prosecution. Who would get away with this? Or is this standard SOP if someone retires?

Note: This report was days before Page and Baker resigned.

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Sure they're keeping it all from us.
Ha ha ha.
Come on people wake up.
No they're not.
There's no media black out. They are not going after Obama or Clinton or Lynch or Holder or who ever the hell else this fantasy loving crowd can think up.
They're going after trump.
Trump and trump alone.
Impeachment coming.
Maybe jail.

Denial is a regular occurrence for you, isn't it?! The mind does funny things to protect people from psychotic breaks I guess.

It sounds like poor Sillyolme needs a Delusional Stripper treatment. At 3:20 video in the link below.


Delusional Stripper treatment. At 3:20 video

a reply to: BlueAjah

I did a thread in that and a few possibilities were mentioned.

I too am interested in to whom this may be referring. It might be a few different individuals or it could he someone completely unrelated.

I also did a thread back in January, "FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation," that I've been looking for follow up in but there has not been anything new reported there either.

I have a feeling a lot of those sealed filings are still waiting on judicial appointments to be cleared before being opened so as to avoid the mucked up corruption the last several administrations have filled varying judges seats with.

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
I'm amazed this has only just been posted. I watched it on Friday and saw the date, the 18th and assumed I'd missed it on ATS.

Thanks for posting.

Actually, this WAS posted on April 18.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Turns out I was correct then. I missed it. Thanks for the link.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
I'm amazed this has only just been posted. I watched it on Friday and saw the date, the 18th and assumed I'd missed it on ATS.

Thanks for posting.

Actually, this WAS posted on April 18.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Turns out I was correct then. I missed it. Thanks for the link.

You missed the paper work. But the video was just recently posted. The video announcement is more convincing in my opinion.

a reply to: face23785

He and trump still plan it every night I dont care what his title is
Or what his job description is.
You are correct he's no journalist.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

He and trump still plan it every night I dont care what his title is
Or what his job description is.
You are correct he's no journalist.

You're equating what he does with journalism and "the news cycle". It makes a big difference what he does and what he is. He does not run the news cycle there and Trump has no influence on it, which is probably why Harvard found over half of Fox's Trump coverage in his first 100 days in office was negative. That's also probably why you don't care, because it destroys your false narrative. Hannity is a political commentator on Fox, nothing more. He doesn't do news, so no matter how crazy he is that doesn't discredit someone linking to an actual news article at Fox. No more than Rachel Maddow being a nutjob automatically discredits every single link to MSNBC. The facts of the story are what matters, but you've been told not to trust anyone at Fox as if Hannity is on 24/7 and runs the network. You've been brainwashed.

Also, this type of behavior is hardly exclusive to Trump-friendly commentators.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Yeah, it was the video I saw. The Storm is brewing.

a reply to: Sillyolme

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

He and trump still plan it every night I dont care what his title is
Or what his job description is.
You are correct he's no journalist.

You're equating what he does with journalism and "the news cycle". It makes a big difference what he does and what he is. He does not run the news cycle there and Trump has no influence on it, which is probably why Harvard found over half of Fox's Trump coverage in his first 100 days in office was negative. That's also probably why you don't care, because it destroys your false narrative. Hannity is a political commentator on Fox, nothing more. He doesn't do news, so no matter how crazy he is that doesn't discredit someone linking to an actual news article at Fox. No more than Rachel Maddow being a nutjob automatically discredits every single link to MSNBC. The facts of the story are what matters, but you've been told not to trust anyone at Fox as if Hannity is on 24/7 and runs the network. You've been brainwashed.

Also, this type of behavior is hardly exclusive to Trump-friendly commentators.

Yea you are wrong here in the amount of influence you claim hannity to have on fox. He is their heavy hitter and call many shots and has a say in pretty much anything he is interested at fox.

Yes he does indeed have a desk in the white house he uses and the calls have been verified. An extremely dumb move on potus part cause what i see is hannity following the perps in the op to be held accountable for their email crimes and such and hannity will go down for real estate fraud and money cleaning. COHEN will sell him out!

a reply to: howtonhawky

Dead eye Hannity?

👀

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Doctor Smith

She knew what was coming when she said

“If he wins, we’ll all hang.”

Ok, I see people saying that bitch said this. I've read it so many times. Where does this quote come from?? Where is the evidence that she actually said this? What's the original source?

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Doctor Smith

She knew what was coming when she said

“If he wins, we’ll all hang.”

Ok, I see people saying that bitch said this. I've read it so many times. Where does this quote come from?? Where is the evidence that she actually said this? What's the original source?

A five minute search using google?

The same kind of unnamed sources that leak false narratives about trump? Good old hit and run tactics?

I don’t know much about the video below, or the person. Not endorsing the person in anyway. The video gives a narrative and gives the supposed quote about the 4:58 mark?

SR# 1271 NBC Crew - Crooked Hillary’s MASSIVE MELTDOWN at Commander-in-Chief Forum

m.youtube.com...

Snopes take....

Hillary Clinton Threw a Tantrum with Matt Lauer?
An unfounded rumor held that Hillary Clinton threw a tantrum, and a water glass, after NBC's "Commander-in-Chief" Forum in September 2016.

www.snopes.com...

Rumors that Clinton threw a “tantrum” after NBC’s Commander-in-Chief Forum started with a fictitious quote, and that narrative was later expanded with more fake quotes from other anonymous sources. Meanwhile, no actual evidence has surfaced to prove that any of these events actually transpired.

I guess Lauer still has a job and has not committed suicide.......,,.. you tell me wha the truth is?

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: howtonhawky

Dead eye Hannity?

👀

From what i have heard all the big talk show guys have the same agent.

hannity
rush
beck