Tommy Robinson (Arrested)

originally posted by: Lucius Driftwood
a reply to: ScepticScot

bigot
ˈbɪɡət/
noun
a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

Tommy Robinson saw fit to dialogue with Maajid Nawaz. No racist insults, hatred or slurs. Dialogue.

A conversation with Adam Deen (Quillam Foundation) where he questions and challenges his beliefs but doesn't demand the removal of his right to think and say what he wishes. You're going to have to do better than throw generic slanders about.
www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

So because you can find YouTube videos that means he isn't a racist and a bigot despite being ex BNP and founding the EDL. Think you need to do a bit more research.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

a court case is going to fall apart because one man outside was filming himself.

You should try reading the actual reasons behind a lot of outrage by a considerable number of British posters here....

Posted by Bastion earlier.

As defence are pleading for mistrial they can use Tommy's video and discussion of this on UK messageboards in evidence and gain acquittal as presumption of innocence was voided. It's also illegal to discuss (which is why newspapers don't have comment sections on legal cases) but unlikely to ever be pulled up and slander/libel.

Yes, the defence could use T Robinson's vid to get this sick group of people out on a mistrial.

Child rapists go free and you blame the guy filming himself outside. What nonsense. I fear the British brain has turned to oatmeal.

They weren't going free they were on trial. The person risking the trial was Tommy Robinson.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

a court case is going to fall apart because one man outside was filming himself.

You should try reading the actual reasons behind a lot of outrage by a considerable number of British posters here....

Posted by Bastion earlier.

As defence are pleading for mistrial they can use Tommy's video and discussion of this on UK messageboards in evidence and gain acquittal as presumption of innocence was voided. It's also illegal to discuss (which is why newspapers don't have comment sections on legal cases) but unlikely to ever be pulled up and slander/libel.

Yes, the defence could use T Robinson's vid to get this sick group of people out on a mistrial.

Child rapists go free and you blame the guy filming himself outside. What nonsense. I fear the British brain has turned to oatmeal.

They weren't going free they were on trial. The person risking the trial was Tommy Robinson.

Then why the hell are people saying these people will go free?

a reply to: LesMisanthrope


It may be a travesty in your opinion but someone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court, thats how laws have worked for a very long time. Mistrials happen all over the world, not just here in Britian and T. Robinson could cause such a mistrial here.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope


It may be a travesty in your opinion but someone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court, thats how laws have worked for a very long time. Mistrials happen all over the world, not just here in Britian and T. Robinson could cause such a mistrial here.

They are presumed innocent, and no amount of activism or reporting on the outside changes that.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope


The defence could say the jury "could" be lead by listening to T. Robinson outside the court and putting their defendents presumed innocence at risk.

originally posted by: circuitsports
More and more posters keep talking about crime being a person talking about crime, the irony level here has gone plaid.

Need I post quotes by the caliph or grand ayatollahs, the spiritual heads of Isalm on there "true" beliefs and see whose gonna vote for that way of life in the UK?

No one.

If they out breed and become the majority they will have the numbers to vote for that way of life.

its happened in a few countries already

a reply to: Boadicea

Ahh thankyou ... been around a few years just read the posts mostly.. but sometimes my gander is up all the very best to you Boadicea

a reply to: skywatcher44

I've been looking for tommy for long-time. I've been to Luton, London and some other places. I was wishing I'd grab him from his throat and unleash hell.

This animal is dangerous to our society. This m***** f***** need a good beating.

Annnd ... Just in case you don't know .....

Southern FRAUD Lauren had few Muslims boyfriends back in the days.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope


It may be a travesty in your opinion but someone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court, thats how laws have worked for a very long time. Mistrials happen all over the world, not just here in Britian and T. Robinson could cause such a mistrial here.

They are presumed innocent, and no amount of activism or reporting on the outside changes that.

The UK doesn't allow trial by media as it risks predjudicing the jury. There is strict liability rule once proceedings begin to ensure there is no outside influence.

Some countries have lower standards than this, preferring more freedom of the press and laxer restrictions, the UK court temporarily restricts to ensure justice. Both have merits.

a reply to: skywatcher44


How is he dangerous to your society?
Why do you think using violence is justifiable because you don't share their opinion?
You look like fascist with this attitude.

originally posted by: amraks
a reply to: skywatcher44


How is he dangerous to your society?
Why do you think using violence is justifiable because you don't share their opinion ?
You look like fascist with this attitude.

Who have I said is dangerous in my society ?
I do not think using violence is justifiable because I do not share someones opinion ?
What such attitude ?

Now I will go back over my posts and check if they have been doctored.

I think you have questioned Mekhanics vicious angry posting ? Peace..

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: skywatcher44

I've been looking for tommy for long-time. I've been to Luton, London and some other places. I was wishing I'd grab him from his throat and unleash hell.

This animal is dangerous to our society. This m***** f***** need a good beating.

Annnd ... Just in case you don't know .....

Southern FRAUD Lauren had few Muslims boyfriends back in the days.

Do you think I know Tommy ? Your anger beef with him is your own problem and unlawful in the extreme..
Have you been drinking some strange brew ?
Do you think I know Lauren Southern ? I do not and am not interested in her old boyfriends if those pictures are genuine ?
I do like some of her YouTube content not all but some, is that allowed ?
You do actually sound quite unhinged with your angry postings and what goes around from the likes of you usually comes around to bite your arris. I wish you a speedy recovery and a happier life.. Take care dude.. AH.
Tommy Robinson is not so hard to find with open eyes..

I am still trying to find what has actually rattled your cage.. When I write IMHO it is just an opinion. The reference to Muslim boyfriends what was that about ? The vast majority of Muslims are nice kind peoples IMHO of course.. Do you have a link with the accused monsters maybe ? That might rattle so much mm maybe not.. NOI..

Still looking.
I realize you want to Nuke Israel Noted AH.. I like Israel..
I realise you think Alex J is full of sh#t. AH. I chuckle at some of his reporting's.
You call someone a deluded specimen. Rude AH. I respect whoever..
You don't like your Orange Donald. I think he is better than some before.
It was Americans, British and Macedonians not Russians AH.. It was the Russians
What is a Scotch of Whisky ? AH Maybe scotch or whisky. Scotch is Whisky AH
You like mc Putin AH I don't mind him I don't trust him.
(post by mekhanics removed for a serious terms and conditions violation) AH Had a bundle of these.

Conclusion a Muslim dude AH with a humongous chip. Supports those accused of shocking treatment of minors maybe ?.. Sad Indeed.

originally posted by: amraks

originally posted by: circuitsports
More and more posters keep talking about crime being a person talking about crime, the irony level here has gone plaid.

Need I post quotes by the caliph or grand ayatollahs, the spiritual heads of Isalm on there "true" beliefs and see whose gonna vote for that way of life in the UK?

No one.

If they out breed and become the majority they will have the numbers to vote for that way of life.

its happened in a few countries already

They don't have to be majority, just a sufficient percent, and the violent elements within will force the rest of the population in line.

How increased islamization % affects countries

As an American, or "Yank", I've seen my fair share of disinformation and bull# news. There's definitely something missing from the picture, and before you believe a single word you hear on your "telley" you should consider the source.

Attacking girls on the street? Head butting veterans in protest? What better way to get a populace all wound up and defensive in order to make a voice go unheard? Happens all the time in America.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

a court case is going to fall apart because one man outside was filming himself.

You should try reading the actual reasons behind a lot of outrage by a considerable number of British posters here....

Posted by Bastion earlier.

As defence are pleading for mistrial they can use Tommy's video and discussion of this on UK messageboards in evidence and gain acquittal as presumption of innocence was voided. It's also illegal to discuss (which is why newspapers don't have comment sections on legal cases) but unlikely to ever be pulled up and slander/libel.

Yes, the defence could use T Robinson's vid to get this sick group of people out on a mistrial.

Child rapists go free and you blame the guy filming himself outside. What nonsense. I fear the British brain has turned to oatmeal.

They weren't going free they were on trial. The person risking the trial was Tommy Robinson.

Then why the hell are people saying these people will go free?

Who is saying that?

As has been explained extensively by Bastion the UK has very strict rules on reporting trials in order to ensure a fair trial.

You can disagree with those rules or think them unnecessary however they exist and Tommy Robinson actions constituted a clear breach of them and risked integrity the trial. Assuming they are guilty he is risking then being let off on the basis they can't get a fair trial for his own self promotion.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

a court case is going to fall apart because one man outside was filming himself.

You should try reading the actual reasons behind a lot of outrage by a considerable number of British posters here....

Posted by Bastion earlier.

As defence are pleading for mistrial they can use Tommy's video and discussion of this on UK messageboards in evidence and gain acquittal as presumption of innocence was voided. It's also illegal to discuss (which is why newspapers don't have comment sections on legal cases) but unlikely to ever be pulled up and slander/libel.

Yes, the defence could use T Robinson's vid to get this sick group of people out on a mistrial.

Child rapists go free and you blame the guy filming himself outside. What nonsense. I fear the British brain has turned to oatmeal.

They weren't going free they were on trial. The person risking the trial was Tommy Robinson.

Then why the hell are people saying these people will go free?

Who is saying that?

As has been explained extensively by Bastion the UK has very strict rules on reporting trials in order to ensure a fair trial.

You can disagree with those rules or think them unnecessary however they exist and Tommy Robinson actions constituted a clear breach of them and risked integrity the trial. Assuming they are guilty he is risking then being let off on the basis they can't get a fair trial for his own self promotion.

Black pigeon claims it was the SENTENCING PHASE OF THE TRIAL, If I didn't mishear. Maybe I'm wrong, but sentencing phase seems like final step of the trial when sentence is given. If I heard right, and it is what it sounds like, it doesn't seem like he could influence, unless he actively engaged with jury prior to them sentencing, but if it was sentencing phase and the jury was already in, there is nothing to influence.

a reply to: ScepticScot

I have taken the time to present something. You have done NOTHING but throw accusations, which is very easy to do from behind a keyboard. Present some evidence and Justify your bigotry.

originally posted by: Lucius Driftwood
a reply to: ScepticScot

I have taken the time to present something. You have done NOTHING but throw accusations, which is very easy to do from behind a keyboard. Present some evidence and Justify your bigotry.

Yes you have got me. I am intolerant of racists and bigots. Guilty as charged.

Oh and the fact he was a member of the BNP isn't an accusation its an established fact.

a reply to: Xenogears

I believe that relates to a claim made by Tommy Robinson but is incorrect. I will see if I can find the link confirming. It doesn't really matter anyway as the rules prohibit filming at the court at any stage.