-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Hmm MSM anon just posted n 8 that his/her superiors are freaking out because something big is about to break. Could be just a troll though take it with a grain of salt. All sorts of people post on the chans.

Is MSM anon a known entity with credibility?

If so...tomorrow is Friday and that's when a lot drops.

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: CoramDeo

Well, that would be because i'm a turd. I totally got my numbers wrong some how..... it's #64 that Q references.

So, I made a mistake YAY!

B'cuz that is soooo much better than plain ole losing my mind.....

you're not lol. here is /qr 64

no link because it is from my archive

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Hmm MSM anon just posted n 8 that his/her superiors are freaking out because something big is about to break. Could be just a troll though take it with a grain of salt. All sorts of people post on the chans.

Is MSM anon a known entity with credibility?

If so...tomorrow is Friday and that's when a lot drops.

No i just used MSM to hide the network the person is supposedly working for. The post stood out to me that's all.

When you get on a rollercoaster and that first part that seems to take forever, being cranked up to the top?

Then the exciting part begins.

Here's to this ride being right there at the top right now!

a reply to: AnkhMorpork


You're right. Bolton is too radical for delicate negotiations. He wanted to attack NK and "get it over with" last fall. Last month, Bolton said on FoxNews that there's no need to plan a big summit. Paraphrasing: Just tell Kim Jong to let us haul away all his nuclear materials, or get wiped off the face of the earth.

a reply to: dashen

I sincerely hope these traitors get publicly executed.

I don’t believe anything less than that is justice enough.

Traitors deserve the ultimate shame and hate a united nation can muster.

This kinda lends more credence to the Mueller is a grey hat theory. Interesting. Mueller team gives judge unredacted memo on Russia mandate Bold emphasis is mine.

Attorneys for special counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday provided a federal judge with an unredacted memo detailing the scope of his investigation.

Mueller's team made the filing after Judge T.S. Ellis III requested the full document, Bloomberg and Reuters report. The memo was written by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel investigation, and spells out in detail what Mueller can investigate.

The document was filed under court seal.

A heavily redacted version of the memo has already been made public.

In one section of the memo, Rosenstein gives Mueller the authority to investigate allegations that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort "committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials" during the 2016 presidential race. The memo also authorizes Mueller to investigate whether Manafort "committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government."

The other areas of Mueller's investigation are blacked out.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AnkhMorpork


You're right. Bolton is too radical for delicate negotiations. He wanted to attack NK and "get it over with" last fall. Last month, Bolton said on FoxNews that there's no need to plan a big summit. Paraphrasing: Just tell Kim Jong to let us haul away all his nuclear materials, or get wiped off the face of the earth.

Bolton is doing as much damage as the msm

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Post 64 is closest drop with anything close to "lights out"

Anonymous ID:WBXFv1gI Thu 02 Nov 2017 16:31:24 No.147683156  Report

Quoted By: >>147683274 >>147683357 >>147683412 >>147683415 >>147683568 >>147683607 >>147683855 >>147684906 >>147685432 >>147686252 >>147686488 >> 147686662 >>147687310 >>147687546 >>147687917

Fellow Patriots,
I'm being advised actions have created accelerated counter-actions.
We have not yet ascertained the scope of the attack. 
Watch the news outlets.
POTUS' Twitter take down was not by accident (as referenced several hours ago).
Should the lights go out please know we are in control. 
Do not panic.
We are prepared and assets are in place.
God bless - I must go for good at this point.
Q

source


EtA: I see you found it already!

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like Gina Haspel is getting confirmed as CIA Director in the Senate.

BwaaaHaHaHa

I'm interested in seeing who voted for her and who voted against her after confirmation.

2 (R) no's

6 (D) yes's

(I think)

🔐

The vote was 54-45. Rand Paul and Jeff Flake voted no. I expect Paul voted his conscience (which I can respect), while Flake is a known never-Trumper.

Thank-you. I wonder if McCain would have been a YES or a NO? He needs to retire ASAP.

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

YES! This is the one I was referring to.

Was trying to put a post together about the reference Q made to #64, dang kids keep side tracking me, and when I went back to it it was gone!

Random thought rolling 'round in my head. Could the purge of the Q posts be a precursor to what is to come? As in deletion to protect Q?

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Hopefully some of these traitors get grabbed by the Agency and sent to black sites where they will be tortured to death. F them! No mercy! No deals!

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: CoramDeo

Well, that would be because i'm a turd. I totally got my numbers wrong some how..... it's #64 that Q references.

So, I made a mistake YAY!

B'cuz that is soooo much better than plain ole losing my mind.....

Lol. No worries.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like Gina Haspel is getting confirmed as CIA Director in the Senate.

BwaaaHaHaHa

I'm interested in seeing who voted for her and who voted against her after confirmation.

2 (R) no's

6 (D) yes's

(I think)

🔐

The vote was 54-45. Rand Paul and Jeff Flake voted no. I expect Paul voted his conscience (which I can respect), while Flake is a known never-Trumper.

Thank-you. I wonder if McCain would have been a YES or a NO? He needs to retire ASAP.

He has stated he was a no.
But Noone needs to listen to someone who has a brain tumor

€10 Billion Mysteriously Disappears From Gaddafi’s Frozen Accounts in Belgium

A massive €10 billion has mysteriously disappeared from the late Muammar Gaddafi’s accounts that were frozen as part of the sanctions against the leader’s inner circle.Gaddafi’s account, which is located in Belgian and belonging to the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) contained some €16.1bn in frozen assets. In 2017, authorities tied to seize the funds, but it was revealed there was just over €5bn left in those accounts.Belgian judicial authorities reportedly noticed the funds ‘disappear’ in autumn 2017 when the investigating magistrate, Michel Claise, requested the full seizure of the frozen Libyan funds.According to the paper, Belgium failed to comply with UN regulations governing asset freezes on certain Libyan accounts in banks…

Don't ya think that Weiner's laptop was just unsealed and hour or ago would make them nervous?

originally posted by: butcherguy
When you get on a rollercoaster and that first part that seems to take forever, being cranked up to the top?

Then the exciting part begins.

Here's to this ride being right there at the top right now!

That pause at the top is when all the guilty rats on the rails below can run and hide. Could be what all the visitations to these various countries was about... a place to HIDE.

GA post 64 as indicated on the chan

Q !UW.yye1fxo 64
Jan 27 2018 00:42:19 (EST)
PDF !
www.endusmilitarism.org...📁

eta: This is a PDF

originally posted by: Martin75

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like Gina Haspel is getting confirmed as CIA Director in the Senate.

BwaaaHaHaHa

I'm interested in seeing who voted for her and who voted against her after confirmation.

2 (R) no's

6 (D) yes's

(I think)

🔐

The vote was 54-45. Rand Paul and Jeff Flake voted no. I expect Paul voted his conscience (which I can respect), while Flake is a known never-Trumper.

Thank-you. I wonder if McCain would have been a YES or a NO? He needs to retire ASAP.

He has stated he was a no.
But Noone needs to listen to someone who has a brain tumor

Thankyou. I was wondering if McCain had voiced an opinion on Haspel. For a lifelong war-monger, his stance is puzzling. But at this point "What difference does it make". Right?

originally posted by: Jusvistn
a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

YES! This is the one I was referring to.

Was trying to put a post together about the reference Q made to #64, dang kids keep side tracking me, and when I went back to it it was gone!

Random thought rolling 'round in my head. Could the purge of the Q posts be a precursor to what is to come? As in deletion to protect Q?

Could be...but it's not the first time the board has been purged. Looking at headlines today would lead me to think that, yes, big things are afoot. btw- after reviewing my files, it looks like the purge happened between 2 and 3pm FWIW