-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: Bill1960
I'm aggravated that once AGAIN the Deep State has managed to kick the can down the road on the OIG report. Testimony is now scheduled for 18 June. The Awan crew has now cut a plea deal instead of going to trail today, and will appear in court on 3 July to finalize that. No doubt the Deep State prosecutors will insist that they plead guilty to double parking and get the hell out of the country. The friendly Federal judge will certainly agree this is fair and just. But after all of the booms we have seen this week, and there have been a few, to cap off the week, tomorrow 8 June is "World Oceans Day".

B60

It sounds really, really trite, but: you know the truth.

The great awakening through the system of Q has given us plebes the chance to see the docs, see the systems, make the connections and come to our own unique conclusions. That's an evolved POV. Wanting an 'authority' to verify or certify what you now know is not what Q is about. You know more then those in authority if you follow Q, be empowered by that.

Down time from Q this past weekish has been largely about that, allowing us Q army folks to digest, assimilate and grow from the work here.

Mass consciousness awakening...ironically, we are the ones we have been waiting for...I think we are doing ok!

a reply to: liveandlearn

Here is a bit of backstory on this.

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele

Fox News

The former intel staffer Wolfe was reportedly working with Warner.

a reply to: burntheships

How soon people "forget"

fee fi fo fum, I smell the scent of a smoking gun
👁🚬🔫

a reply to: The GUT

That was interesting to say the least. Especially since it seems to partially confirm what many of us know on some level.

a reply to: burntheships


Great find! No wonder Mark Warner told the DOJ to NOT COOPERATE with Congressional committees seeking documents.

Mark Warner's Tells DOJ to FIGHT Congressional oversight (ats thread): www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: xuenchen

It very hard to keep track of all of these crooks, and just
look at how the NYT article makes NO mention of any
of these connections.

Warner’s texts with Washington lawyer Adam Waldman, who has ties
to Christopher Steele of the Russia dossier; Waldman also represents
one of Russia’s top oligarchs, Oleg Deripaska who has been an "asset"
in the past for Robert Mueller's FBI under Hillary Clinton State Department.

There are deep ties here to the dark side.

a reply to: crankyoldman

The problem is that so much isn't leaked as it is manipulated mis or dis information designed to undermine, not necessarily enlighten or expose.

Yes, I was alluding to that.

At the same time I am a supporter of Julian Assange. His publication of leaks are without commentary except in the broader sense explaining what they are.

This seems very much to be a conspiracy in that it was two people working together to accomplish a goal.

None the less, I want the prosecution or not to be very clear to distinguish the difference. That is something I think will not happen. Although consider all the gov. leakers who have just been fired and not otherwise punished with nothing done to the publisher.

So working together may be a different situation all together.

a reply to: 0bserver1

Yes but unfortunately I just realized that I found a shorter snippet. There's a longer one if I remember correctly--not by much--where he continues the train of thought and fleshes out his description a bit more.

ETA: I'll also try and find the transcript where Father Balducci debated Sitchin. Pretty amazing read!


ETA II: Balducci & Sitchin

The Vatican seems ready to accept "them" as spiritual brothers.

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: CoramDeo

I must admit I struggle with this. Leaks can be good for transparency. I have no idea what the leaks from the presumed source were or if they were tainted by opinion. But the publisher of the leak, for me, should not be punished. The leaker, especially if an oath has been taken, probably.

Would like to here other opinions on this.

It's true that leaks are good for transparency, but transparency isn't always good.

Take for example if the the day itinerary for any POTUS, past or present was passed to a news outlet or anyone else, and POTUS was injured or killed in an attack because of that intel, then transparency is not good. There are always things that you don't want domestic or foreign enemies to know aout our government.

I believe the journalist has a duty to vet any information they receive to ensure that it is not classified. Of course that's me wearing my own ethics hat. The problem is that most journalists have no hat, or the hat only fits when it harms their guy or girl.

I came into possession of Top Secret classified information on one occasion. Back in 2006 I was working for an unamed company designing, building, and repairing radios for the alphabet agencies. The one radio we build was for MI use and looked like a typical suitcase, 30"X20"X9", and opened with flaps along the top where the handle was. Inside were six tunable .5-18 GHz 1U receivers that slid into the case, a 1U Mainboard, and several 1U banks of hard drives for recording the SigInt picked up by the receivers.

Well, someone managed to roll the damn thing down two flights of steps end over end, so it came back to us for repair. So I, and another engineer, connected it to the LAN fired it up and started poking around to see what was up. I can remember the look on my co-worker's face as the list of files presented. Locations all around Iraq where they had dragged this thing and hours of SigInt recordings that we weren't supposed to see. Needless to say, we wasted no time powering down and securing the case. A call to the DOD facitlity in Baltimore had a friendly set of faces there to remove and secure the drives so we could continue our work. They didn't make a big fuss or ask questions, but I'm guessing it might have been a different story if we had said nothing or gone exploring and showing other co-workers.

I guess the moral of the story is if you think you have stumbled onto or hav been given classified information, and you don't have clearence, you're only doing yourself a favor by not having it in your possession and not passing it around like a love note dropped on the floor by a classmate in thrid grade.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: liveandlearn

Here is a bit of backstory on this.

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele

Fox News

The former intel staffer Wolfe was reportedly working with Warner.

Thank you BTS. That explains a lot. Seems collusion on multiple levels.

a reply to: liveandlearn

That is the tip of the iceberg! Reading the indictment,
it seems that this James Wolfe was leaking alot of stuff
to several newspapers. It seems he was leaking information
related to the Russia Probe, and witness subpoena's etc.

I am speculating this ties to Carter Page, or other witnesses
in the Russia Probe.

a reply to: The GUT

The Vatican seems ready to accept "them" as spiritual brothers.

I'm not so sure if those brothers have any good intention with us ?

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: liveandlearn

That is the tip of the iceberg! Reading the indictment,
it seems that this James Wolfe was leaking alot of stuff
to several newspapers. It seems he was leaking information
related to the Russia Probe, and witness subpoena's etc.

I am speculating this ties to Carter Page, or other witnesses
in the Russia Probe.

Yup, Page is in there:

Wolfe allegedly was in contact with "REPORTER #2" and exchanged tens of thousands of electronic communications and often daily phone calls, according to the indictment. He would also meet at the reporter’s apartment, court papers alleged.

Wolfe had extensive contact with reporters about "MALE-1," who was reportedly identified as Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser.

Wolfe received classified information about "MALE-1" on the same day he exchanged 82 text messages with "REPORTER #2," according to the indictment. A few weeks later, "REPORTER #2" published an online article that revealed the identity of "MALE-1."

On April 3, 2017, Watkins’ byline appeared on a BuzzFeed article that revealed that Page had met with a Russian intelligence operative in 2013.

Wolfe allegedly called "REPORTER #2" nearly a half-hour after the story went live and had a phone conversation for about seven minutes.

In December 2017, Wolfe allegedly messaged "REPORTER #2."

“I’ve watched your career take off even before you ever had a career in journalism. ... I always tried to give you as much Information (sic) that I could and to do the right thing with it so you could get that scoop before anyone else. ... I always enjoyed the way that you would pursue a story,like nobody else was doing in my hal1way (sic). I felt like I was part of your excitement and was always very supportive of your career and the tenacity that you exhibited to chase down a good story," the message read, according to the indictment.

It is alleged that Wolfe used several means to contact reporters, including Signal and WhatsApp. He also met “clandestinely in person,” in secluded areas of the Hart Senate Office Building, the indictment charges.

[url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/08/james-wolfe-former-senate-intel-panel-security-director-indicted-for-allegedly-lying-to-fbi.html]Link[ /url]

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: The GUT

The Vatican seems ready to accept "them" as spiritual brothers.

I'm not so sure if those brothers have any good intention with us ?

I don't think so.

a reply to: The GUT


Here is the "Carter Page meets with Russian Spy" article, authored by Ms. Ali Watkins.
www.buzzfeed.com...

But I don't see her citing an "unnamed source" as providing content for the article. Maybe I'm overlooking it.

a reply to: CoramDeo

I understand what you are saying and point taken.

As i recall some publishers notifed the whitehouse about their publication. Apparently Glenn Greenwald was one as I recall Obama telling us we were going to here some things soon...yada, yada, yada. Greenwald had much more info that he didn't publish.

Assange said he notified the Whitehouse of some of his last publications as well.

This is good journalism. It is discretionary.

You are speaking , it seems, of ongoing operations that could jeopardize others. Like you, I would have a heavy conscious about even reading such.

The question to leak or not is always a matter of conscious regardless of the motives behind it.

a reply to: The GUT

Great find there Gut!

Also, Wolfe was married to a 20 year veteran of the FBI,
high ranking FBI officer.

twitter.com...

twitter.com...

And this, too much!

Harry Reid thanks SCI Democrats James Wolfe and Dan Jones ( connected to
D Mark Warner whose leaked texts with Russian Oligarch led to Christopher Steele)
for their great service!

fas.org...

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: liveandlearn

That is the tip of the iceberg! Reading the indictment,
it seems that this James Wolfe was leaking alot of stuff
to several newspapers. It seems he was leaking information
related to the Russia Probe, and witness subpoena's etc.

I am speculating this ties to Carter Page, or other witnesses
in the Russia Probe.

As much as I read I have no idea how I missed this. Looking at your earlier link to Fox and the emails (or voice to texts) it seems someone was in contact with wikileaks.

It is late for me and am not comprehending well. Will take a look tomorrow but seems a lot of info and Warner may be in some trouble as well.

The long-awaited watchdog report on the FBI and DOJ’s Hillary Clinton investigation during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released next Thursday, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said

June 14 is POTUS' birthday. Coincidence?

a reply to: burntheships

Oh boy...

This Wolfe-watkins thing is now officially connected to Q. Behold..



Signal. The messaging app that allows for encryption. Q verified an anon pointing it out back on Jan. 27. According to the indictment, that's how these two were communicating.

Q knew they were using Signal to communicate