Here Are The Questions that Bob Mueller Wants President Trump to Answer.

a reply to: Sillyolme

so if the president chooses not to speak what do you get?

mueller has nothing on him

a reply to: Sillyolme

You realize Trump already answered questions from the "Bueller" investigation.

It happened 2 months ago.

but but but

🤦‍♀️👋

originally posted by: Scrubdog

It's been well-reported that Mueller's team is divided into "Possible Crimes Committed While in Office" - the "Obstruction" crimes in this questionaire, the "Possible Crimes Committed Prior to Taking Office" - the financial ties to Russia which go back years and do not require questions as to Trump's state of mind, and then the third "Other" - which has been the source of a great deal of speculation.

If what you say above is true, then in fact there can be no doubt that this Special Prosecutor investigation has been, as the President says, a "Witch Hunt" from the very beginning.

The probe was supposed to determine whether or not Trump, or his campaign, "colluded" with the Russians in an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. First, collusion is not a crime...so one has to wonder why this investigation even began...and second, no evidence of collusion has been found.

The sinister element to all of this is Rosenstein's instruction that Mueller may pursue any other matter that may come up in the course of their inquiries - apparently into everything that Trump (or anyone he has ever come into contact with) has ever said or done in his/their entire life.

Mueller and his hit squad have so far destroyed the lives of a number of people on charges unrelated to campaign collusion...but very clearly designed to put pressure on people to give up - or make up - information about the President. Weak and/or bogus charges of lying to Investigators, failure to register as an agent of a foreign government (not Russia), supposed money-laundering and tax evasion...and now Mueller, with a straight face apparently, is going after Cohen's business practices, to try to put pressure on him to implicate the President in the whole Stormy Daniels blackmail effort ($130k wasn't enough for her apparently) relating to a consensual event that is alleged to have happened a decade before Trump was elected.

This should maybe end in family court, if it is true - but is not the people's business, or within a million miles of Mueller's investigative mandate.

I have 4 words for you: Politically Motivated Witch Hunt

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Mueller isn't looking for impeachable offenses. He's investigating Russian interference in the election AND because he acts like a guilty fool...obstruction of justice.
Maybe he really is just an idiot and not guilty of anything.

if that is true this investigation is done

when is "acting guilty" a crime?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

so if the president chooses not to speak what do you get?

mueller has nothing on him

He could simply invoke the 9th & 10th Amendments !!

✴️

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

so if the president chooses not to speak what do you get?

mueller has nothing on him

That may be true, but I'd like to know your source for that claim.

Can you provide one?

a reply to: shooterbrody

Pleading the fifth would only come into play if the grand jury subpoenas the president.
I don't see that happening as that would definitely make the president a target not a subject of the investigation. I think if he agreed to an interview, where he can say I don't remember but not plead the fifth, it might lead to a grand jury subpoena but right now Mueller is operating under the idea that you cannot indict a sitting president and so wouldn't bother with the grand jury.
And as I already pointed out Mueller doesn't need his cooperation. He has stated as much.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

so if the president chooses not to speak what do you get?

mueller has nothing on him

Your first line is a question. Answer is that Mueller either issues a grand jury subpoena to Trump.
Pres. Clinton got a Grand Jury Subpoena in 98 and Nixon in 74.

Or

Alternatively, Mueller could conclude the investigation with the evidence and testimony he already has without Trump having the opportunity to dispute the evidence and explain himself.

"Mueller has nothing on him"
Thus far, the Special Counsel has not sought to question "subjects" until they had evidence and/or other testimony regarding the topics they look to question the subject on.

The way the questions are structured and the subjects they cover appear to be giving Trump an opportunity to affirm or dispute evidence the Special Counsel already has.

Reading those questions, it really does look like it would be in Trump's best interest to be interviewed and interject his "version" of events on the evidence and testimony the Special Counsel already has, but Trump often does not do things that are in his own best interest.

a reply to: introvert

the fact that he has been told several times he is not a target
hard to impeach a subject

a reply to: Sillyolme

good if mueller doesnt need him he can wrap it up

a reply to: introvert

It comes under...You have the right to remain silent.
The fifth is for court questioning while miranda rights covers police interrogations.
But that doesn't prevent the police from recommending charges. That's what the grand jury does right?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

the fact that he has been told several times he is not a target
hard to impeach a subject

If he is not of interest to the investigation, why would they want to question him in the first place?

Please provide a source that says, specifically, that Mueller has nothing on Trump.

a reply to: Sillyolme

And it only applies to "real" Q-uestions !!

The Strategy is working again as we all can see.

Hurry back into the corral zone !!

🤫

a reply to: shooterbrody

Hard to indict a sitting president. So why bother labeling him a target.
Mueller will submit a very concise report to the DOJ. Then we see where it goes.
I'm sure trump is depending on that for his last line of defense. Sessions loyalty and Rosensteins fear.

a reply to: introvert

the fact that he has been told several times he is not a target

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: introvert

It comes under...You have the right to remain silent.
The fifth is for court questioning while miranda rights covers police interrogations.
But that doesn't prevent the police from recommending charges. That's what the grand jury does right?

The 5th amendment is a bit more complicated than that, but it does state that one does have the right to not be forced to say anything that will incriminate themselves and that they have a right to be indicted by a grand jury for criminal charges.

originally posted by: mobiusmale

originally posted by: Scrubdog

It's been well-reported that Mueller's team is divided into "Possible Crimes Committed While in Office" - the "Obstruction" crimes in this questionaire, the "Possible Crimes Committed Prior to Taking Office" - the financial ties to Russia which go back years and do not require questions as to Trump's state of mind, and then the third "Other" - which has been the source of a great deal of speculation.

The probe was supposed to determine whether or not Trump, or his campaign, "colluded" with the Russians in an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. First, collusion is not a crime...so one has to wonder why this investigation even began

"Collusion" is a catch all, the crimes associated with it range from Racketeering, Money Laundering, Campaign Finance Violations, Espionage, FARA violations, Defrauding the United States Government, etc. etc. etc.

...and second, no evidence of collusion has been found.

Are you privy to the evidence the Special Counsel has gathered? have they issued some conclusion I am unaware of?

a reply to: Sillyolme

indict him for???

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

the fact that he has been told several times he is not a target

I have not seen anyone say that Mueller does not have anything on Trump and the idea that he is not a potential target has been thrown out the window, considering they want to interview him in order to get a grasp of his intent. So please provide a source that states specifically what you claim.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

the fact that he has been told several times he is not a target
hard to impeach a subject

Impeachment is congresses decision, not the Special Counsel's.

And yes, you can impeach a "subject", you can impeach any President. "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" is pretty much a flowery place holder for congress saying we feel like it.