It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like Noah’s,
6,500 years ago….
Like Adam and Eve’s,
11,500 years ago….
This, too,
Will come to pass ….
“….This was no ordinary extinction of a vague geological period which fizzled to an uncertain end. This death was catastrophic and all inclusive….What caused the death of forty million animals….The ‘corpus delicti’ in this mystery may be found almost anywhere.
….Their bones lie bleaching in the sands of Florida and in the gravels of New Jersey. They weather out of the dry terraces of Texas and protrude from the sticky ooze of the tar pits off Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles…The bodies of the victims are everywhere…We find literally thousands together…yound and old, foal with dam, calf with cow….The muck pits of Alaska are filled with evidence of universal death….a picture of quick extinction…Any argument as to the cause….must apply to North America, Siberia, and Europe as well.
Now both molten layers are liquid; however, the inner magnetic and electrical structure of the Earth makes these layers act as if they were near solid, or plastic. As long as the magnetic and electrical structure maintains its orderliness, this old earth keeps on rotating on its axis in a normal manner.
The growing ice caps – Antarctica and Greenland -- are not centered on the earth’s axis; and, because they rotate around the poles, are trying to swing down to the equator. The only way they could di it would be to pull the whole 60-mile thick shell around with them. As long as the shallow molten layer stays plastic, the shell won’t shift; but once every few thousand yeas the magnetic and electrical orderliness inside the Earth is disrupted, and the molten layer is allowed to act like a free liquid, which it was all the time anyway. It then serves as a lubricant for the ice caps to pull the shell of the earth around the inside.
In ¼ to ½ day the pole moved almost to the equator and all hell lets loose…
-The Beresovka mammoth, frozen in mud, with buttercups in his mouth;
-The age of the gorges below Niagara Falls and St. Anthony’s falls, both about 6,500 years;
-The uninterrupted years of evolution on the Galapagos, over 11,000;
-The geological dating in the Murrumbidgee River Basin system in Australia, showing the end of an ice cap there about 11,500 years ago;
-The age of fossil bones taken from the Wilshire Boulevard tar pits, over 11,000 years;
-The sudden end of all work in prehistoric city of Tiahuanaco, Peru, 9,550 B.C, or 11,500 years ago;
-The end of the Wisconsin ice cap, about 29,000 years ago;
-The sudden 200-foot rise of the oceans all over the world 6,000 to 7,000 years ago;
………
A little bit of knowledge
Can be a dangerous thing;
Or it can be a vibrant seed
Giving rise to verdant forests
And awakening sleeping giants.
For example, Hancock cites “huge numbers of warm-blooded, temperate adapted mammal species were instantly frozen, and then their bodies preserved in the permafrost [...] the bulk of the destruction seems to have taken place during the eleventh millennium BC“ (Hancock, 1995, p. 479). The assumption is, if temperate climate regions were suddenly thrust into polar conditions, large numbers of animals, unable to adapt and/or flee, would perish. Another piece of evidence claims that portions of the Antarctic ice sheet are much younger than previously thought, and that in reality portions of Antarctica remained glacier-free until the end of the last ice age or even later. Hancock writes:
...sedimentary cores collected from the bottom of the Ross Sea by one of the Byrd Antarctic Expeditions provide conclusive evidence that ’great rivers, carrying down fine well grained sediments’ did flow in this part of Antarctica until perhaps as late as 4000 BC (Hancock, 1995, p. 477). Supposedly, if Antarctica still had flowing rivers, then it could not have been completely covered by ice, and in that case, since we know it is now in a polar location where it is too cold for such rivers, it would make sense if it were previously located outside of a polar climate.
Over the years the incongruities have become increasingly apparent as to why dinosaurs and pterosaurs should not be so large. For the large dinosaurs there are the incongruities of 1) insufficient bone strength, 2) insufficient muscle strength, and for the taller dinosaurs 3) the problem of unacceptable high blood pressure. For the pterosaurs there is the paradox that no reptile, not even the smallest reptiles, can fly today and yet during the Mesozoic the pterosaurs grew to be the largest flying animals that ever existed. Clearly the belief that there is no scientific paradox regarding the exceptionally large dinosaurs and pterosaurs is incorrect. Yet the paleontology community has no means of saving face while backing down from their position, and so they continue to mislead the public by denying the paradox.
The confusion caused by the paleontology community has made it extremely difficult for science educators to teach their students Galileo’s Square-Cube Law, and so Galileo’s Square-Cube Law is still being left out of most science education programs. The National Science Education Standards points in the right direction by emphasizing the teaching of the importance of size; yet the National Science Education Standards does not warn science teachers of the existing scientific incongruities and thus it hurts the grade school science teachers who follow its directive. Elementary science teachers are caught like a deer in the headlights the moment one of their smarter students point out the incongruity between the previous existence of exceptionally large dinosaurs and the argument that size is important. The failure of the paleontology community to solve the dinosaur sized paradox obstructs the ability of science educators to teach the fundamental science of Galileo’s Square-Cube Law thus producing the awful effect of holding back the advancement of all the sciences.
originally posted by: fightzone58
a reply to: ClovenSky
it is also the base plot of the movie 2012
originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: schuyler
I wasn't aware that our historical record was that accurate and no further changes are needed at all.
originally posted by: ClovenSky
www.cia.gov...
The Adam and Eve Story – Chan Thomas
Supposedly from a CIA declassified/sanitized document from 2013
So here is a theory about the worldly disasters that seem to strike the earth every 5000-6000 years. An idea about adam and eve. An idea about how the earth cleanses itself. An idea about continuous rebirths and a fraction of a fraction from humanity surviving each time to start a new stone age. Could this be what the anunnaki discovered was coming and rose to the heavens in their ships to watch the deluge?
The main part of the document starts at page 10/57
Like Noah’s,
6,500 years ago….
Like Adam and Eve’s,
11,500 years ago….
This, too,
Will come to pass ….
Page 17/57
“….This was no ordinary extinction of a vague geological period which fizzled to an uncertain end. This death was catastrophic and all inclusive….What caused the death of forty million animals….The ‘corpus delicti’ in this mystery may be found almost anywhere.
….Their bones lie bleaching in the sands of Florida and in the gravels of New Jersey. They weather out of the dry terraces of Texas and protrude from the sticky ooze of the tar pits off Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles…The bodies of the victims are everywhere…We find literally thousands together…yound and old, foal with dam, calf with cow….The muck pits of Alaska are filled with evidence of universal death….a picture of quick extinction…Any argument as to the cause….must apply to North America, Siberia, and Europe as well.
The document suggests that the main cataclysms of the past, occurring roughly every 6,000 years, are the result of one of the molten layers of the earth turns from semisolid to liquid. The buildup of the ice sheets wants to equalize at the equators and when the molten layers allow, they reposition. The entire mantle of the earth will move with the layers of water and atmosphere wanting to remain in place at their current rotation. Thus with the movement of the mantel against the atmosphere and large bodies of water, the winds are terrible with mile high walls of water washing over the earth, lasting for 6 days and on the 7th day, starts to settle down.
Page 20/57
Now both molten layers are liquid; however, the inner magnetic and electrical structure of the Earth makes these layers act as if they were near solid, or plastic. As long as the magnetic and electrical structure maintains its orderliness, this old earth keeps on rotating on its axis in a normal manner.
The growing ice caps – Antarctica and Greenland -- are not centered on the earth’s axis; and, because they rotate around the poles, are trying to swing down to the equator. The only way they could di it would be to pull the whole 60-mile thick shell around with them. As long as the shallow molten layer stays plastic, the shell won’t shift; but once every few thousand yeas the magnetic and electrical orderliness inside the Earth is disrupted, and the molten layer is allowed to act like a free liquid, which it was all the time anyway. It then serves as a lubricant for the ice caps to pull the shell of the earth around the inside.
In ¼ to ½ day the pole moved almost to the equator and all hell lets loose…
Evidence found that supports this phenomena: pages 22/57 – 24/57
-The Beresovka mammoth, frozen in mud, with buttercups in his mouth;
-The age of the gorges below Niagara Falls and St. Anthony’s falls, both about 6,500 years;
-The uninterrupted years of evolution on the Galapagos, over 11,000;
-The geological dating in the Murrumbidgee River Basin system in Australia, showing the end of an ice cap there about 11,500 years ago;
-The age of fossil bones taken from the Wilshire Boulevard tar pits, over 11,000 years;
-The sudden end of all work in prehistoric city of Tiahuanaco, Peru, 9,550 B.C, or 11,500 years ago;
-The end of the Wisconsin ice cap, about 29,000 years ago;
-The sudden 200-foot rise of the oceans all over the world 6,000 to 7,000 years ago;
………
I found this to be kind of an interesting document. It appears to tie a lot of historical evidence together combining a lot of different scientific disciplines
Page 57/57
A little bit of knowledge
Can be a dangerous thing;
Or it can be a vibrant seed
Giving rise to verdant forests
And awakening sleeping giants.
Credit to poster ldd on this article from zerohedge
www.zerohedge.com...
originally posted by: fightzone58
earth crust displacement is not a declassified document. charles hapgood wrote it 60 years ago or so. it has been proven false for a very long time
originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: schuyler
Why not try and defend it? In defending ones position, the knowledge gained is extraordinary. If I cared at all about what mainstream taught and worshiped group think, you are correct, I would have never posted this. It would be a sad and boring world to be pigeonholed into what group thinks accepts.
originally posted by: fightzone58
a reply to: ClovenSky
it is also the base plot of the movie 2012
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: schuyler
Why not try and defend it? In defending ones position, the knowledge gained is extraordinary. If I cared at all about what mainstream taught and worshiped group think, you are correct, I would have never posted this. It would be a sad and boring world to be pigeonholed into what group thinks accepts.
Because it is not credible. It's fiction. If you want to advance knowledge, study Graham Hancock's work in "Magicians of the Gods." It ls hardly "group think" and is distinguished by the fact that he actually does research and presents compelling evidence which you, yourself, can verify. Your case here is not worth pursuing.
originally posted by: fightzone58
earth crust displacement is not a declassified document. charles hapgood wrote it 60 years ago or so. it has been proven false for a very long time
Jun 30, 2008 - Rapid changes in the churning movement of Earth's liquid outer core are weakening the magnetic field in some regions of the planet's surface, a new study says. "What is so surprising is that rapid, almost sudden, changes take place in the Earth's magnetic field,"