It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Whereismypassword
If you Q lot actualy cared about children you would not have ignored Trump and Epstein
With the exception of a few most of you are not parents either, and that shows when you take innocent photos of children and see something sexual about them
When you stop ignoring Trump, you might be taken more seriously
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Whereismypassword
nobody ignored it.
nobody.
trump never visited epsteins pedo isle or flew aboard the lolita express.
after ONE SINGLE complaint by a patron of Mar-A-Lago PEDO Epstein was BANNED FOR LIFE.
Oh what? youre gonna quote Pedo Epsteins shady brother's testimony? again?
##YAWN##
âDisclosure of responsive information to such requests can risk severe consequences, including potential loss of human lives, damage to relationships with valued international partners, compromise of ongoing criminal investigations, and interference with intelligence activities,â stated the May, 3 letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd.
âAfter careful evaluation and following consultations with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the White House, the Department has determined that, consistent with applicable law and longstanding Executive Branch policy, it is not in a position to provide the information responsive to your request regarding a specific individual,â the letter states.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Whereismypassword
wow, alot of conflated rubbish and made up CRAPOLA.
I expect nothing less from you.
its your style
your posting history is a testament to your talented investigative prowess.
you mean FBI Bureau Chief GUNDERSON made it up?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Whereismypassword
All right ... I'll bite.
As obsessively as everything else related to the president is being investigated, why aren't these things being investigated?
Why have they gone over a decade back to dig up a one night stand with a porn star?
Didn't Trump tweet something about a Pakistani mystery man . I will go with him but I don't really think it is .
So now the question is to whom were they referring? Several choices here.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Whereismypassword
Sued for money yet never pursued charges criminally. Sure makes sense.
you watch yourself kiddo
...but never calls Trump out on his plane ride with Jeffrey Epstein on the Lolita Express...
Not the "Lolita Express," but a different plane owned by Epstein. This information comes from a court filing quoting the "testimony" of Jeffrey Epstein's brother, Mark, in a deposition. This plane ride was not on the notorious "Lolita Express," and it was described as giving Trump a ride back to New York from Florida in the "90s." This seems to be the only time Trump flew with Epstein. Trump's name did not appear on any flight logs of the Lolita Express, unlike Clinton's name, for example.
What exactly should Q be calling out? Do you have reason to believe there's more here? I'm not trying to give Trump a free pass, but what I have seen indicates that much was made of nothing by the usual rabble rousers... That's the red flag... not the fact that Q hasn't mentioned it. But if you've got more, I'm listening...
...or his complimenting Epstein about his fine choice in "young women"?
Here is the direct quote from the New York Magazine interview in 2002:
âIâve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. Heâs a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it â Jeffrey enjoys his social life.â
In hindsight, we understand that Epstein's interest is with literal girls... not women on the younger side. And while girls are off limits, young women are not. And the sad thing is that every woman knows that men have a tendency to throw away their wives at a certain (older) age and start dating sweet young things.... Hence the old joke about men trading their wives in for a newer model. So while we may find it pretty darn shallow and pathetic, we're not surprised. Especially not when it comes to the mega rich. Rather, it's easy enough to accept Trump's words at face value, especially lacking any further evidence that he was speaking of actual girls and not young women. And of course the accusations with no evidence then become the red flag...
So I ask again: What exactly is Q supposed to call out?
I could go on for ever on why Q should not be taken seriously but the above question should be enough to discredit Q and convince any Trump supporter that Trump is in fact an insider answering to a higher power.
Actually, no, because your premise is based on incorrect information, and therefore it is a faulty premise. If anything, it seems that you bought into the original psyop against Trump... but before I continue, I would really like to know your response to what I've posted already. I could go a dozen different directions from here! But I'd rather discuss with you than speak at you.