It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that govenment sponsored organizations (United Nations), NGOs (Clinton Foundation), Church Organizations (ALL faiths), or Music and Media entities (silence) would overlook the abuse in their organizations to maintain the status quo. They have sat, and do sit on this type of information to save face and keep the money flowing, a sad reality that is never morally justified.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: doobydoll
Some thoughts on this very interesting Youtube video:
1) It could be the MOAB suggested as coming out this week by Q,
2) It shows Mattis and Flyn wanting to follow up the Shell Games in 2012 but being fired by Obama - this probably gives us a birth date for the Plan and for Q!
3) This is what the last 2 months "stage setting" has been about,
4) The release of this has, in my view, been managed by White Hats and is not an independent action of 2nd Lieutenant Scott Bennett.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: doobydoll
If all of these S3nators and Congressmen had this info since 2012 and sat on it, this is enough to bring down our government. The whole thing about getting all the ducks in a row and taking all of this time to act was supposed to be in an effort to keep everything stable.
WTH is happening?
originally posted by: ketsuko
Questioning where the original EC docs came from that started the counter-intel investigation.
Last week the FBI released the original “electronic communication” (EC) documents that underpinned the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation. The first half of this interview contains some stunning information: the raw intelligence product within the EC did not come through official intelligence channels.
Meaning, the origin of the 2016 counterintelligence operation, which was specifically started by CIA Director John Brennan sharing his ‘raw intelligence product’ with the FBI, was not an official product of the U.S. intelligence community. Brennan was NOT using official partnerships with intelligence agencies of our Five-Eyes partner nations; and he did not provide raw intelligence -as an outcome of those relationships- to the FBI.
So where did that info come from if ti wasn't coming through official channels?
There is a link to that interview in the story.