It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LurkNoMore
originally posted by: ketsuko
Questioning where the original EC docs came from that started the counter-intel investigation.
Last week the FBI released the original “electronic communication” (EC) documents that underpinned the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation. The first half of this interview contains some stunning information: the raw intelligence product within the EC did not come through official intelligence channels.
Meaning, the origin of the 2016 counterintelligence operation, which was specifically started by CIA Director John Brennan sharing his ‘raw intelligence product’ with the FBI, was not an official product of the U.S. intelligence community. Brennan was NOT using official partnerships with intelligence agencies of our Five-Eyes partner nations; and he did not provide raw intelligence -as an outcome of those relationships- to the FBI.
So where did that info come from if ti wasn't coming through official channels?
There is a link to that interview in the story.
A supporter of the American Communist Party at the height of the Cold War, Brennan brought into the CIA a raft of subversives and gave them plum positions from which to gather and leak political espionage on Trump. He bastardized standards so that these left-wing activists could burrow in and take career positions. Under the patina of that phony professionalism, they could then present their politicized judgments as “non-partisan.”
Not only was he an apologist for the Muslim Brotherhood, but Brennan’s Islamophilia dated to his days in college, when he spent a year in Cairo learning Arabic and taking courses in Middle Eastern studies. He later got a graduate degree with an emphasis in Middle Eastern studies. In 1996, his ties to the Islamic world tightened after he became the CIA’s station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He once recalled that “during a 25-year career in government, I was privileged to serve in positions across the Middle East — as a political officer with the State Department and as a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodians of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina. I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Muslims by making that privilege — that pilgrimage.”
originally posted by: redletter
Anyone else wonder if this Q-Anon and Wikileaks business is a psy-op covert war being done by the Kremlin?
.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Skyfloating
I am flabbergasted.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: ketsuko
Tick Tock
I watched this, and found it interesting. I have only seen this woman a few times, and once in regard to Q, and she interrupts everything. She is very good at stopping thoughts, destroying coherence and so on.
Here she asked questions clearly prepared for her, without NLPing them into oblivion, and then let him speak. His measured, articulate answers were clear if you wanted to listen. Fascinating shift.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: LurkNoMore
Explain the flabbergastness please. The various badges are made by the same supplier?
originally posted by: fiverx313
a reply to: LurkNoMore
originally posted by: LurkNoMore
if you really think someone has this info and just sitting on it, how could that possibly be morally justified?
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Yeah, what a con man ole' Al G is, he certainly doesn't practice what he preaches does he. The whole global warming scam is a really good example of using people's good will and intentions against them. Every reasonable person would agree that it's BAD to pollute the Earth and some reasonable regulations are needed. However, like every other Fed. agency, the EPA has been co-opted to extort people and push Agenda 21.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: LurkNoMore
Explain the flabbergastness please. The various badges are made by the same supplier?
The contain the universal symbol of pedophilia etched into them. The symbol has been cropping up all over the place on this thread.