Sandy Hook parents sue radio host Alex Jones for defamation

a reply to: randyvs

Jones is saying that no one died.
Well he is now attempting to say that.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Thats the problem...some idiot follower of Jones BS will turn up to some poor dudes house asking questions with a gun.

And there it is there. That kind of
thinking that is the obvious goal.

The govt. should just take everyones gun
then because we just don't know who
is about to flip out. And I'm terribly afraid.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: randyvs

Jones is saying that no one died.
Well he is now attempting to say that.

And the proof that someone did should not
be open to scrutiny. Like it is thru the media.
I don't trust our media I don't even trust Jones.
Jones is just noting the same things I am
in the one camp. Whole ga damn world is bullshlt

a reply to: randyvs

No it isn't maybe to stop mentally ill folk who would fall for Jones BS and carry out such crap yeah maybe take guns away from the mentally unwell.
Also I did not say anything like that so good job there I'm all for sane people being able to have guns.
I have one myself.

But a question to yourself now did kids die that day?.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I'm not entirely sure I quite understand the above, but are you trying to say that school shootings only happen in the USA?

No you do understand. Rash, as in multiple, consecutive, over abundant. These are not
terms that imply possession. So only in this
country do we see a rash of shootings that
involve children. For upscale public sentiment?
Or just because america?

Well, let's use a little logic, shall we? How many guns are there in the USA? How easy is it to get a gun? How easy is it in fact to get a magazine-fed rifle? And how easy is it for a mentally incompetent person to get hold of a weapon? Oh and finally how toxic is the gun culture, with people like the NRA screaming that teachers need to be armed? Add all of the above together and you have your answer. You have a toxic gun-obsessed subculture with access to, guess what, guns. And you act all surprised that there are school shootings?
Let me add a little context here. Am I calling for gun control, or, as the lunatics on here will instantly scream, gun confiscation? No, don't be an idiot. My wife's cousin lives in a cabin in Idaho where occasionally she sees bears out of her windows. The USA has bears, wolves, coyotes, mountain lions and rattlesnakes, not to mention other poisonous snakes and the occasional very cross moose. You need guns. Do you need an assault rifle to blow away a deer though? No.
I'm British. The only thing we have is the odd deranged seagull or in the case of Scotland today a very angry badger. Do we have school shootings? Not since the tragedy of Dunblane, after which limits on gun ownership came in. But that's this country, not your country and what worked here is not going to work there. My wife is American and she agrees with me that yes, the USA needs guns, if alone for the dangerous wildlife, but holy crap you don't need as many guns as you actually have. And the gun lobby needs to stop being led by Wayne LaPierre. That man's so slimy that I'm amazed he can hold anything, plus he has the moral principles of a weasel.
Here's a novel idea: have some common sense when it comes to guns.
Oh and stop being so bloody demented. No-ones suggesting mass gun confiscation. That's crazy talk.
Is common sense too much to ask for?

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

No no no no the reason we have gun rights
in this country is survey said! Because of
tyrannical gov. is a fact of life. And the
men who began this country knew that
very well and even very recently. Some
thing you might give more thought you
know?
So it isn't paranoid to be on vigulante
when it comes to the right to defend
yourself and your family. In fact paranoid
does sound right. And that right should
extend to to the best maxed out magazine
Bumper stock sporting war weapon man
has come to conceive. Whatever a govt.
puts in some 18 year old kids hands and
sends him off to war with. That same kid
has a right to defend himself with when
he comes home to live under that same
gov. as a man. If he makes it home.

I gotta say, this is about the sickest thing I've ever heard of Alex Jones doing.

While I've never had any respect for him in the first place, this has made me outright despise him.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: vonclod
The whole interview was about bashing Jones and
playing the sympathy card.

You sir, are reprehensible.

I would suspect you are very young and have no children of your own, or you would understand the heart- wrenching agony these poor people are going through with the death of their children. If there is anything these parents deserve, it's sympathy.

a reply to: testingtesting

But a question to yourself now did kids die that day?

How can l answer that honestly? I don't know because I have no proof. And odds are you
don't have any either. You just choose to
believe a story on TV radio and newspapers.
It isn't impossible that it was fabricated.
It isn't impossible something else was really
going on. But you have a right to be gullible.

Next thing we know, people will sue flat earthers because reasons.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

No no no no the reason we have gun rights
in this country is survey said! Because of
tyrannical gov. is a fact of life. And the
men who began this country knew that
very well and even very recently. Some
thing you might give more thought you
know?
So it isn't paranoid to be on vigulante
when it comes to the right to defend
yourself and your family. In fact paranoid
does sound right. And that right should
extend to to the best maxed out magazine
Bumper stock sporting war weapon man
has come to conceive. Whatever a govt.
puts in some 18 year old kids hands and
sends him off to war with. That same kid
has a right to defend himself with when
he comes home to live under that same
gov. as a man. If he makes it home.

I have no idea what the above means, other than something inarticulate.
I will state my case again: common sense.

a reply to: randyvs

The gullible are the people falling for Alex Jones's lies.
He used to be laughed at on ATS...

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
Thats the problem...some idiot follower of Jones BS will turn up to some poor dudes house asking questions with a gun.

Well, that's the issue, isn't it? But some others need to put their money where their mouths are. It's one thing to post from the basement, in your pajamas, but it's quite another to take your fetid accusations out into the light...with the accountability that comes with free speech.

Attention Please -

Another reminder and a final warning.

ALL MEMBERS Please read: Sandy Hook

We have tried to explain and we have been patient, our patience is at its end. This is the only warning you will receive.

Going forward anyone who posts a thread that seeks to implicate the innocent victims of the Sandy Hook Tragedy, for any reason, and/or posts any personal information or links to personal information on those people will have their posting privileges restricted and their thread removed without further discussion or warning.

Discussing the utter mishandling of the breaking story by the MSM is one thing, questions about what happened are fine, but, defaming, libeling, or otherwise exposing innocent people, especially those who are still suffering from this tragedy, to further insult or pain is below the base level of compassion we can tolerate.

Please keep this in mind while discussing this topic.

Do not reply to this message.

a reply to: nightbringr

I'm 59 four kids grown. And I haven't witnessed
anything from any of these people that even
resembles the out of mind agony I know damn
well would ruin me. I do remember one of them
very well tho and sympathy was just not there
for some odd reason.

No point.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Ya I have trouble responding on this
phone anyway. But at least I know
what I'm try'na say.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

Prove Jones wrong.
What's so hard about that?

Jones is the one making the claims, he’s the one that needs to provide evidence; that’s how that works.

Else I could say, “randyvs was the shooter on the grassy knoll, prove me wrong.”

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: randyvs

What do you want for him to dig up his dead sons corpse to show he died?.
You know what disgusts me? people who attack some poor sod who lost his son because of their paranoia that people are coming for their guns.
You know I hope one day they come for just those peoples guns because they are sick in the head.

-prove there’s a body
-prove it’s his son
-prove he died by gun shot
-prove he died at sandy hook on the day in question
-prove he wasn’t paid off to allow his child to be sacrificed in the name of blood magic
What’s so difficult about that?

How about you run those questions past him, and get back to us about what he said to you.

What's so difficult about that?

Not on jones’ side, hence the escalating series of proofs culminating in one about “blood magic”, it was meant to be a touch hyperbolic to show that jones and his followers aren’t the type to run out of reasons to go on believing a conspiracy theory.

The goal posts will ever move and none that believe jones will ever have enough evidence to change their opinion.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: nightbringr

I'm 59 four kids grown. And I haven't witnessed
anything from any of these people that even
resembles the out of mind agony I know damn
well would ruin me. I do remember one of them
very well tho and sympathy was just not there
for some odd reason.

You’re making assumptions about other people based on what you believe you would be like in the same position.


You’re stretching more than a rubber band.