It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Meanwhile in Texas, we recently made it legal to carry a sword on your back.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kester
I guess it's universal.
No one is addressing the behavior of individuals, they are only focusing on the tools.
I see this as lazy and an attempt at control rather than addressing the actual problem.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
wait until the poms try to figure out how the # they are going to cut up that beautiful medium-rare T-bone steak?
They'll be screwed - they'll have to use a plastic spork or their bare hand - LOL, they'll get frustrated soon enough with all the sauce running everywhere.
You reckon thats bad - wait until the poms try to figure out how the # they are going to cut up that beautiful medium-rare T-bone steak?
Instead of addressing the retards, the UK (and US) government will simply force taxpayers to be treated like criminals, therefore eliminating having to address root causes.
Pathetic
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: bastion
Lol, I said similar earlier, just focused on the reasons why we are carrying sharps.
British law is cool enough, but carrying in a kitbag is prob the sensible option, if only to avoid distraction.
originally posted by: Kester
.50 calibre rifles and rapid firing rifles are also proposed to be banned...
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Irishhaf
Believe it or not, I'm pretty much free to do whatever I want, when I want, as long as what I do doesn't have a negative impact on anyone else.
Obviously there are some things that I have to be a bit more 'discreet' about, but.....
I have no problems with our gun control laws or legislation relating to knife ownership etc.
Neither do I have any desire to moralise to Americans about their gun control laws.
The UK has many social issues and some of these are at the core of what is fuelling the recent spate of killings in London.
We need to start admitting that we have these problems and start addressing these core issues free from the PC restraints and dictates that seem to oversee every aspect of our society at present.
originally posted by: Kester
PROPOSALS FOR NEW KNIFE OFFENCES
A. Creating offences to prevent knives being sold online and being delivered to a private residential address and ensuring age and identity of the purchaser are checked
Knives would be sent to a collection point and purchasers would have to produce identification papers when picking up.
B. Making it an offence to possess certain weapons in private
"Weapons" held for cultural, artistic or religious reasons and those held by collectors may be subject to registration. Many large blades are agricultural tools. Axes are mostly used for wood processing. I find the use of the word weapons rather ignorant.
Theatrical suppliers would be affected. Interesting 'point' here.weaponsofchoice.com...
“What about plastic blades?”
I don’t carry them. Plastic breaks more easily than steel, and then you have a very sharp stick with the same potential for danger as a real weapon. Steel is safer.
C. Making it an offence to possess a knife or offensive weapon in educational institutions other than schools
What is the definition of school?
D. Amending the offences of threatening with an article with a blade or point, or an offensive weapon
The new proposals are built around a theoretical "reasonable person". Seems a bit hazy.
E. Updating the definition of a flick knife
There are many knives that can be opened as quick, or almost as quick as an old flick knife. Peasant knives may fall under the proposed definition. The opening technique is at 1:45.
There are proposals for acid and corrosive liquid restrictions.
.50 calibre rifles and rapid firing rifles are also proposed to be banned. I don't use them for bushcraft much but I'd like to know a few of my neighbours had them in case of rogue government.
Comment here from the Forest School Association.
www.forestschoolassociation.org...
. . . a threat is open to interpretation. For example some one may be holding a knife pointing toward someone a distance away and the person may interpret this as threatening even though the person holding the knife is not doing this in a threatening way. This needs to be reworded to avoid any misuse of this law change.
There's too much vagueness in these new knife legislation proposals.
We need more constables doing what they do best, not wishy-washy ignorant townie knee jerk amendments with openings for abuse.
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: Kester
.50 calibre rifles and rapid firing rifles are also proposed to be banned...
Ahhh yes, about time, we've been averaging 30 people a day being killed with .50cal rifles in our town...
...no, wait, sorry, I must be confusing that with "stuff that has never happened".
originally posted by: TDawg61
What's next,spoons?Soon you won't have any cutlery left!