Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online

Shocking.

Looks like the old worn out narrative about white males and mass shootings/violence is simply wrong.

Sometimes it just takes a 40 year old Iranian Vegan "body builder" pro-Youtuber.

Perhaps this Iranian terrorist should've been stopped during its 700 mile trip. Or during its insane PETA/liberal cause videos.

originally posted by: Guyfriday

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: IAMTAT

How could a video such as that one not be allowed to get millions of views.

Her Boobers, alone, should be good for a couple of hundred thousand views.

Those breasts don't match up with the other pictures of her from her website. The ones in the video are larger then the cat suits she's wearing on the site. On top of that, why are they not moving at all in the video? Has there been any confirmation at all that this person is a he or a she yet?

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Wookiep

a reply to: Konduit

It's all so bizarre I seriously wondered for a moment if she is AI. It's like we woke up one morning and the world has become some strange movie.

It does seem a little "Ghost in the Shell" like in both appearances, and story line. Police were given a heads up about her by the parents, she was spotted sleeping near the shooting site by the police but they did nothing, the media's lack of probing questions, the CEOs now calling for stricter gun laws (even though this was is California), and finally the andragoginess appearance of the shooter. It's almost "Individual Eleven'ish" in nature.

You may be right.
Once I stopped looking only at her breasts...and noticed her neck in the video ...it seems too long for the body and smaller head size, along with different lighting between head and body.

a reply to: Guyfriday

yup she/he's wearing a breast form plate...they are a different colour and don't move an inch and notice the jewellery choker covering the join where the breast form meets the neck? If it is a woman I think it's going to come out that she had some form of mental illness sadly

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
While i don't want to blame the victim here, i have to wonder what they expected. They yanked the financial rug out from under people they thought were unhinged in one way or another, and didn't expect something major and drastic as a result?

This lady, as strange as she was, produced content for them that they make money off of. She is a contract employee for them. And that is how they treat their content providers.

Hidden underneath the horrible act is a story that people need to discuss.

Given how many views the videos seem to have vs. the amount of subs this person has could mean that this person was using Bots to bump up the views. That could explain the huge reduction of value the person was getting in revenue from the videos. They had less then 4k subs, yet somehow had 100k plus views? That seems like scamming to me, but I'm not going to say for sure since it could happen. On the other hand if this person "was" running a bot to bump up views, then You Tube would have that IP data to justify the reduction of value.

This absolutely has to be a trans person. That face and neck is just not right. And don't get me started on the eyes..

Ooft.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's animation so I reckon they've boosted her up a bit up top.

a reply to: Guyfriday

They may have a case, you are right. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

That said...im using reasonable judgement in currently believing she was demonetized in the recent fight against "fake news" that Google/Alphabet undertook, and which impacted several other content providers.

Its a real kicker. If it wasn't youtube as a platform, there would be contracts in place to protect the content providers. Subbing for a contract is "Terms and Conditions". It seems rather lopsided from a bargaining standpoint. And YouTube seems all too aware of this.

a reply to: carewemust

It's not a free product when they make money from your creations, then decide that you yourself cannot profit from those same creations.

Py

Does anyone know how she got around security? Surely it's not that easy to walk into YouTube HQ?

Another poster made an excellent point earlier: If she was roused by the police sleeping in her car, did she have a weapon then?

Also, she had--as has been pointed out--some legitimate grievances. One of her exercise videos for example was filtered for adult content, yet YouTube let's all kind of creepy pasty-type stuff and more go unfiltered even after being flagged by numerous viewers.

YouTube Finally Says Employees Can Talk Publicly About Shooting

Some may disagree with me, but I think monetization was the worst thing to happen to youtube. Before that, regular people would upload videos in their spare time because they wanted to or because they had something to say. Now, there are nothing but idiots uploading videos just to try and make money. Also, I know how youtube works. I don't need to be told in every video to "hit like and subscribe, and don't forget to click the bell icon for blah blah". Then, as if all of that isn't enough, they start with the begging, directing you to their patreon account. It's a mess.

a reply to: JBurns

Now, now she's not quite a terrorist based on the evidence at this point. The motivation seems to be personal and lacks any greater meaning. I do find it odd though that certain people don't seem upset that's she hasn't been labeled as one , as they are with the other shooters with similar motive. Maybe now they will realize it's not due to color or gender of the person, but rather the technical definition.

a reply to: TheLead

Yeah, its like a bizarro modern twist of a 'workplace shooting'.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes it is. It seems the people that make these decisions are generally insulated from the blow back, and for some reason not usually specifically targeted in these instances. I would assume in an off site scenario like this they feel extremely insulated. I wonder if going forward the fact that this reached their workplace if they may have more pause than they might have otherwise.
This would be like a corporate decision that effects a subsidiary company in which an employee of the subsidiary decides to go on a shooting spree at the corporate headquarters. To my knowledge I don't recall many of these?

Please note I'm not suggesting just cause here, im merely referring to the fact this person presumeably felt harmed by this decision.

Domestic Terrorism. She hated a specific place. She wanted to try to instill fear and terrorize a specific group. I would say she accomplished her goal. I am sure David Hogg would be trying to get an interview right now if she was still alive.

a reply to: matafuchs

I guess if she was under the rationale that she was to be a martyr to the injustice of censorship, to bring light to it. Imo right now it reads as she felt harmed by these people and sought revenge. My opinion could change with new information.

Showed hubby three videos with no input from me; he said "that's a dude".

I hate to laugh because of the victims but, the videos are hilariously bizarre. I can't even put a finger on it, it is just too much.

Mental illness is alive, and the cause of our worries.

originally posted by: notquiteright
Some may disagree with me, but I think monetization was the worst thing to happen to youtube. Before that, regular people would upload videos in their spare time because they wanted to or because they had something to say. Now, there are nothing but idiots uploading videos just to try and make money. Also, I know how youtube works. I don't need to be told in every video to "hit like and subscribe, and don't forget to click the bell icon for blah blah". Then, as if all of that isn't enough, they start with the begging, directing you to their patreon account. It's a mess.

Day this happened I was mentioning about demonetizing some people is going to bring repercussions. These days sadly it means more than just campaigns against them due to the way people's mental issues and more are not dealt with. Especially since you have %^$% snip such as Logan Paul being their poster boy for making money not just for himself by the company as well. Who cares about the smaller business livelihoods of people?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Subrosabelow

They totally demonetized her channel, and then applied the filters I'm so familiar with that no one hardly ever saw her videos after that.

oh ya? you're soooo familiar with it huh?

lol

Advertisers most likely didn't want their ads on her content, so they pulled them, but she has to blame someone right? so blame youtube I guess.

originally posted by: abe froman
What would any youtube video get for 300,000 views?

What does a youtube "view" pay?

Nobody is guaranteed any money for views especially if the advertisers do not want their ads on her videos.


This isn't youtubes fault, the advertisers didn't want to place ads on her videos so therefore she got no $.

Advertisers have the right to pull their ads of videos they don't want to be on.