Suspect in YouTube Shooting Posted Rants About the Company Online

a reply to: Konduit
The first person to shoot up YouTube is an Iranian female vegan PETA activist.

Who would have thought?


I wonder what the line was in Vegas

After reading the replies i've reached a conclusion.

The culprit was a far left vegan Iranian who was either a woman or a man who may have been screwed over by youtube-yeah I think it's time some folk take off their Sherlock Holmes' hats.

Has anyone applied Occams' razor yet? Has anyone ever considered that this far left vegan Iranian who was either a woman or man could simply be a mentally unhinged individual? That's the way I see it, this was just a crazy person with a gun until proven otherwise.

Went to Google Images none like the video. Surprise she posted who she wished she was as she or it went off the deep end.

originally posted by: Konduit
We live in strange times frens

Ummmm......ok?

On another note, her parents called the police with a warning she was going to do this. Police found her sleeping in the car and did nothing...obviously, she got the gun on the way there, or police did not search the car,or......

www.mercurynews.com...

So I guess they're trying to tell us that anyone who complains about anything is dangerous? I don't get how an online rant is supposed to be a warning sign of anything? People have been ranting online for decades and it rarely ever translates to anything like this.

Policy made on extreme cases seems a bit crazy to me.

No conspiracies about how she’s a right wing patsy to force private buisinesses to stop censoring content yet?

originally posted by: eNumbra
No conspiracies about how she’s a right wing patsy to force private buisinesses to stop censoring content yet?

No conspiracies about how shes an online conspiracy nutter exacting lunatic revenge?

No matter what angle the stones are thrown in from, everyone just tries to make sure the poo splashes on someone else. Anyone else.

a reply to: eNumbra

I see another conspiracy brewing.

Tech CEOs from Twitter and Uber call for stricter gun control after YouTube shooting

originally posted by: theatreboy

originally posted by: Konduit
We live in strange times frens

Ummmm......ok?

On another note, her parents called the police with a warning she was going to do this. Police found her sleeping in the car and did nothing...obviously, she got the gun on the way there, or police did not search the car,or......

www.mercurynews.com...

Just heard this on my way in to work, it’s absurd that being warned about potential violence leads officers to to often do nothing. LE just dropping the ball left and right.

I can think of another group of angry people that shot a few people over what they thought was oppression. Happened, oh, about 250 years ago now. More or less.

a reply to: xuenchen

In 2014, she posted a video on YouTube of what appears to be the same car, stating that it was vandalized by “anti-vegans” because the car had a sign saying “meat is murder.”

The shooter's logic: "don't eat meat or dairy because it involves the senseless murder and exploitation of animals, but going into a YouTube office to shoot innocent civilians is a-okay"

What a class act....

She was another mind control subject

She was maturing with her control, they had programmed perfectly

Someone in youtube realised what was happening via her very unusual video's and hipnotic motions

They banned the channel

She wigged out, the control programming isnt quiet polished yet.. she lost control and her programmed instincts had her go for the first target that angered her - you tube

so she drove there, pulled out a gun and started killing.. she was shot by a SS or FBI who was chasing her from the house

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Animal Rights activist, her parents called the cops on her to tell them she might be headed to YT with a plan.

Seems everyone she shot was just in the wrong place wrong time.

That's not much of a plan then, now is it? We need more info.

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: eNumbra

I see another conspiracy brewing.

Tech CEOs from Twitter and Uber call for stricter gun control after YouTube shooting

How much more strict do they want gun laws in California? There is already an insane level of them there. I bet those same CEO's have armed security for them.

originally posted by: Konduit
We live in strange times frens

Well, she must've been somebody's crazy/hot GF.
Unfortunately, you sign up for the crazy when you agree to accepting all the good stuff.

a reply to: IAMTAT

How could a video such as that one not be allowed to get millions of views.

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: IAMTAT

How could a video such as that one not be allowed to get millions of views.

Her Boobers, alone, should be good for a couple of hundred thousand views.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: IAMTAT

How could a video such as that one not be allowed to get millions of views.

Her Boobers, alone, should be good for a couple of hundred thousand views.

Those breasts don't match up with the other pictures of her from her website. The ones in the video are larger then the cat suits she's wearing on the site. On top of that, why are they not moving at all in the video? Has there been any confirmation at all that this person is a he or a she yet?

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: Wookiep

a reply to: Konduit

It's all so bizarre I seriously wondered for a moment if she is AI. It's like we woke up one morning and the world has become some strange movie.

It does seem a little "Ghost in the Shell" like in both appearances, and story line. Police were given a heads up about her by the parents, she was spotted sleeping near the shooting site by the police but they did nothing, the media's lack of probing questions, the CEOs now calling for stricter gun laws (even though this was is California), and finally the andragoginess appearance of the shooter. It's almost "Individual Eleven'ish" in nature.

originally posted by: GraffikPleasure

originally posted by: rickymouse
I think all the veggies went to her head.

She seems to have had some issues with anyone challenging her or restricting what she said.

I haven't read much about her yet. It seems there are two people with the same name out there.

Quite the opposite, it starved.
Meat is brain food.

Meat contains taurine, it is a neuromodulator. Taurine is a conditional amino acid, if you do not get the proper balance of nutrients and do not make some specific enzymes, you will not get the calming modulating effect of the taurine. This can lead to some problems where people cannot think correctly. A supplement can be taken but a specialist should be consulted first. Taurine needs adequate enzymes to work too, meat alone may not be able to supply the antiinflamatory and neuromodulating properties unless accompanied by a balanced diet. Energy drinks are not the answer, too much sugar and caffeine in them.

Also meats contain beta blockers which also help to moderate mood and excitability.

Fish contains some chemistry that makes many people smarter, but moderation is important and also some people are negatively effected by fish. So it is not good for everyone and also fish has different chemistries. I cannot eat much sardines or mackeral. I can eat more whitefish than salmon or trout. Also big fish like haddock and albacore tuna and shark contain lots of mercury. If a person doesn't break down purines well, even tuna can be bad if over eaten.

A good hamburger settles me down and makes me mellow.

While i don't want to blame the victim here, i have to wonder what they expected. They yanked the financial rug out from under people they thought were unhinged in one way or another, and didn't expect something major and drastic as a result?

This lady, as strange as she was, produced content for them that they make money off of. She is a contract employee for them. And that is how they treat their content providers.

Hidden underneath the horrible act is a story that people need to discuss.