Active shooter at Youtube headquaters

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

Read the entire thread. otherwise you look stupid when you suddenly drop in making a comment like that. go to page 9.

originally posted by: neo96
Making out our ATS peers as somehow worse than an active shooter is bull snip.

Well I guess you shouldn't be doing that then. What I said is they have no empathy. Do you need me to explain that big person word to you?

a reply to: theantediluvian

Well, remember, kids are simultaneously too stupid to have an opinion on guns but responsible enough to own them. Because logic is for pussies!

a reply to: XAnarchistX

And yet someone up thread said she shot her boyfriend?

Whole lot of collateral damage just to shoot her boyfriend. There is more to this.

originally posted by: JFA13
a reply to: Tempter

Apr 2 2018 23:47:24 (EDT) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 491f56 875289

>>875265
Facebook.
Amazon.
Twitter.
GOOG.
………..
BIG problems.
Q

but Google owns YT

I'm not sure it's a good thing if Q knew this... and therefore others must have known this... and it was still allowed to happen. Especially with Q's previous talk of martial law.

SB Chief 4 victims transported and one deceased in the facility apparent self inflicted GWS and at least 1 of the transported victims was shot

a reply to: yuppa

Words are weapons? That's what I was missing that made ME look stupid? What are you, twelve?

a reply to: XAnarchistX

The anonymous letters arrived this weekend in plain white envelopes with second-class stamps, and were sent to people in at least six communities in England.

doesn't sound like a national thing....
OtherSideOfTheCoin any muslim shenanigans going on on your tiny island?

Press conference - Four victims with gun shoot wounds. Where did the big number posted earlier come from?

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

i see you missed th epost above on page 9 where i said i wa sfooling around. please try to keep up.

Well if ATS would sort out its slow ass servers that randomly stop loading it would help but yeah, I saw your backtracking

not so much backtracking as i go tmy luls.

Call it whatever you want, you're clearly backtracking. Shoved your foot down your throat & are scrambling to mitigate. Nice try, though.

Uh huh. you arent me . you dont know me so you cant speak for me. No personally i dont care someone was shot,because they are strangers to me.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: TobyFlenderson

Read the entire thread. otherwise you look stupid when you suddenly drop in making a comment like that. go to page 9.

Na I think what looks stupid is when you, quite seriously and I would say stupidly, argue thatthat people who offend people with some harsh words deserve what they get even if they get shot.....then expect people to believe you when you claim to have said it for Luls

a reply to: ketsuko

Probably. We all know this would be the first time somebody with a grudge against one person has ever taken out anybody else in the process of taking out the person they're angry at.

originally posted by: FredT
Reports now the shooter was a woman who shot her boyfriend and then killed herself

Again, that's a lot of collateral damage for one murder/suicide.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: neo96
Making out our ATS peers as somehow worse than an active shooter is bull snip.

Well I guess you shouldn't be doing that then. What I said is they have no empathy. Do you need me to explain that big person word to you?

That comment sounded like a lack of empathy.

Pot meet kettle.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: XAnarchistX

And yet someone up thread said she shot her boyfriend?

Whole lot of collateral damage just to shoot her boyfriend. There is more to this.

The press briefing in progress. Mass panic and people trample and hurt themselves. Its also possible that when she shot the first victim she hit others. The one victim is in critical condition

if you start shooting in a crowd people are going to run and in a large crowd thats everyone for themselves people will get hurt (im not blaming them mind you)

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: yuppa

That doesn't justify violence.
They are aholes, but don't deserve to be shot.

This.

We are all responsible for our actions,and if getting shot for shooting off your mouth or being a jerk to someone happens it was your own fault and you deserved it.

What kind of messed up logic is that?

It’s ok to shoot people then if they offend you?

I am quite the jerk round these parts of the interweb so do I also deserve to be shot?

Le tme explain it better. you offend someone or insult them do not be surprised if you die for it. Words are weapons too if used correctly.

If words are that damaging to you, you're too immature and emotionally unstable to own a gun. That's a question I could support making part of background checks. "Do you think it's justifiable to shoot someone if they say something mean to you?"

Followed up by "Will you pinkie-swear to carry your blankie everywhere you take your gun?"

Stop making gun owners look bad man.

a reply to: roadgravel

Early report inaccuracies.

People injured trying to get out of the area.

Somebody having a heart attack during the event.

Any number of other reasons.

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: yuppa

Words are weapons? That's what I was missing that made ME look stupid? What are you, twelve?

Apparently you missed where i said something else. 6th post from the bottom. can you not read between the lines?

originally posted by: neo96
That comment sounded like a lack of empathy.

No, if I were being unempathetic I would continue to let you make posts confusing me calling out people's lack of empathy with your conflation (this is another big person word) of that equating them with the shooter. Instead I empathically offered to explain the word's definition to you.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

It's because it's the internet where your not afraid someone will punch you in the face if you say the wrong thing.