Attorney General Jeff Sessions names prosecutor to probe FBI, DOJ wrongdoing

a reply to: shooterbrody

Until he agrees with everybody else who has investigated this, that no laws were broken. Then of course he will be a Democrat or married to a Democrat or failing everything else, knows a Democrat.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah, I have issues with both yournewswire and FOX, but there's no getting around what Chris Stewart is dancing around. The evidentiary items along with the reporting from better sources backs it up as per Priestap.

I saw that interview shortly after it came out and it is suggestive starting at 2:30.



Now that we know Huber has been working in conjunction with Horowitz for months--and what the published statements from Ohr indicate--it's pretty clear how tight and right on the noose is.

Also keep in mind the recent news reporting that Comey and McCabe are at odds in their conflicting testimony. The conflicting testimony is on record and while the MSM sellouts try and spin the conflict as "a matter of recall" that won't hold up long as they both try and distance themselves from culpability not to mention the testimony coming from those who are cooperating. Comey & McCabe are both obviously weak men and increasingly cornered---it will get ugly between the two I'm betting.

a reply to: shooterbrody

the scope of the investigation set by the attorney general and confined to investigating criminal matters. 

Let us know when he starts investigating things not of a criminal nature.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Until he agrees with everybody else who has investigated this, that no laws were broken. Then of course he will be a Democrat or married to a Democrat or failing everything else, knows a Democrat.

If the ig report had no wrong doing then why the need for a prosecutor?
Who already determined no laws were broken? If that was determined why the need for the ig in the first place?

a reply to: shooterbrody

Wow you're hysterical. I'm pretty sure Mueller knows a bit more than the average Joe how to go about a proper and lawful investigation and certainly in a matter this critical won't be making any mistakes or #ing up. But you can always hope. Or hope that Trump can come up with SOMETHING to smear him with. That would be great huh? Too bad even though there are cemeteries worth of skeletons in the closets of everybody he knows not everybody has shameful things in their past. Trump just doesn't get this because he's never known such reputable honorable people before. He's sure if he keeps looking he will find something. In the meantime conspiracy theories by the dozen will make that attempt .

a reply to: The GUT

Now that we know Huber has been working in conjunction with Horowitz for months--and what the published statements from Ohr indicate--it's pretty clear how tight and right on the noose is.

Interesting it has gone this long with no press leaks, and the ohr portion is pretty damning from what I have read.

Also keep in mind the recent news reporting that Comey and McCabe are at odds in their conflicting testimony. The conflicting testimony is on record and while the MSM sellouts try and spin the conflict as "a matter of recall" that won't hold up long as they both try and distance themselves from culpability not to mention the testimony coming from those who are cooperating. Comey & McCabe are both obviously weak men and increasingly cornered---it will get ugly between the two I'm betting.

I don't think it is just those 2 that it will get ugly between. Just for the broken protocols and lies I think a bunch of them will be in trouble. Let alone any fisa shenanigans.

a reply to: Sillyolme

What manafort was charged for was ALREADY investigated by the fbi and no charges brought. The sc can bring charges from things ARISING from his investigation. Clearly this did not just ARISE from his investigation if it has already been investigated by the fbi.

a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm sorry what? What prosecutor? The IG can't prosecute. They can only report.
And as far as I know that report hasn't been released yet.
Ask yourself why that is if it's supposed to be so vindicating for trump? what's the holdup. They thought they had enough to fire McCabe with the report so why isn't it being released?

Huber doesn't have anything to do with the IG report even though it seems they're all trying to accomplish the same thing.

The house investigation memo failed so now they rest their hope on the IG and then if he doesn't come through this guy in Utah will be their whipping boy. Talk about pressure.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Wow you're hysterical. I'm pretty sure Mueller knows a bit more than the average Joe how to go about a proper and lawful investigation and certainly in a matter this critical won't be making any mistakes or #ing up. But you can always hope. Or hope that Trump can come up with SOMETHING to smear him with. That would be great huh? Too bad even though there are cemeteries worth of skeletons in the closets of everybody he knows not everybody has shameful things in their past. Trump just doesn't get this because he's never known such reputable honorable people before. He's sure if he keeps looking he will find something. In the meantime conspiracy theories by the dozen will make that attempt .

Mueller has trouble with flynns charges now, as the judge(the first was RECUSED and not necessarily of his own doing) has ordered ALL evidence to be turned over as muellers team may have botched that case. Also mueller has trouble with manaforts case now as there are actually going to be hearing to see if mueller even has standing to bring those charges. But hey believe in muellers chase if you like. It hasn't to this point brought anything against POTUS, and the charges brought point to nothing being brought against POTUS.
The fact that you want to discuss this in a thread about the ag appointing a prosecutor to look into what has been revealed from the IG report says alot.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

What manafort was charged for was ALREADY investigated by the fbi and no charges brought. The sc can bring charges from things ARISING from his investigation. Clearly this did not just ARISE from his investigation if it has already been investigated by the fbi.

Quibble away. What makes you think Mueller didn't uncover fresh incidents of money laundering during the investigation? [/gotcha!]

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm sorry what? What prosecutor? The IG can't prosecute. They can only report.
And as far as I know that report hasn't been released yet.
Ask yourself why that is if it's supposed to be so vindicating for trump? what's the holdup. They thought they had enough to fire McCabe with the report so why isn't it being released?

Huber doesn't have anything to do with the IG report even though it seems they're all trying to accomplish the same thing.

The house investigation memo failed so now they rest their hope on the IG and then if he doesn't come through this guy in Utah will be their whipping boy. Talk about pressure.

lol
this is enough
go to the first post in this thread and read the souce info
the ag has appointed a prosecutor (john huber) to investigate the things revealed in the ig report on the fbi handling of hrc email investigation
you know that report that hasn't been released yet? it is the one that got all those fbi and doj people fired or removed from their prior jobs
now there is a prosecutor who can prosecute attached to that mess

and it has NOTHING to do with trump and russia

originally posted by: Sillyolme

I'm sorry what? What prosecutor? The IG can't prosecute. They can only report.
And as far as I know that report hasn't been released yet.
Ask yourself why that is if it's supposed to be so vindicating for trump? what's the holdup. They thought they had enough to fire McCabe with the report so why isn't it being released?

Huber doesn't have anything to do with the IG report even though it seems they're all trying to accomplish the same thing.

The house investigation memo failed so now they rest their hope on the IG and then if he doesn't come through this guy in Utah will be their whipping boy. Talk about pressure.

Good Lord, Silly---you are so uninformed it boggles the mind. Huber IS the appointee to bring charges from the items found by Horowitz and whatever else Huber's team might be finding.

It's not even debatable.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

What manafort was charged for was ALREADY investigated by the fbi and no charges brought. The sc can bring charges from things ARISING from his investigation. Clearly this did not just ARISE from his investigation if it has already been investigated by the fbi.

Quibble away. What makes you think Mueller didn't uncover fresh incidents of money laundering during the investigation? [/gotcha!]

what makes you think the fbi did a shoddy job earlier?

a reply to: The GUT

Good Lord, Silly---you are so uninformed it boggles the mind. Huber IS the appointee to bring charges from the items found by Horowitz and whatever else Huber's team might be finding. It's not even debatable.

QFT
It is laughable.
She doesn't know because they don't talk about this subject on morning joe or trms.
She is gonna be mad when she does find out tho.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Let's see if A.) she actually reads it now that it's been pointed out and B.) if she can admit she is wrong. This is the same person that thought a SCIF was a boat and then went off on a tangent about Trump's secret meeting on his yacht lol.

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: shooterbrody

Let's see if A.) she actually reads it and B.) if she can admit she is wrong. This is the same person that thought a SCIF was a boat and then went off on a tangent about Trump's secret meeting on his yacht lol.

lmfao, I laughed sooooooo hard at that. Like, WOW.

a reply to: The GUT

The conflicting testimony is on record

not only on record it was under oath as well was it not?
and these are the same cats that with a straight face charge some one with lying to the fbi
they make the fbi look like crap

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

What manafort was charged for was ALREADY investigated by the fbi and no charges brought. The sc can bring charges from things ARISING from his investigation. Clearly this did not just ARISE from his investigation if it has already been investigated by the fbi.

Quibble away. What makes you think Mueller didn't uncover fresh incidents of money laundering during the investigation? [/gotcha!]

what makes you think the fbi did a shoddy job earlier?

What makes you think Manafort stopped laundering money?

a reply to: The GUT

I doubt it is a matter of comprehension as much of a matter of obfuscation for the benefit of other readers who haven't/won't look into it. Just muddying the waters with nonsense, no matter how obvious or Silly, will discourage many from taking it seriously. "Just more partisan bickering".


"They" badly need this to be seen as out of the blue if the hammer drops. If large amounts of people start to see the narrative developing ahead of time, they won't be able to scream "Hitler!" when the FBI arrests political opponents of the President for crimes.

So until then, I doubt this gets much press coverage that doesn't contain "in what Republicans say.." or "Republicans continue to allege". It needs to be spun as politically driven so they can further fracture the country if attempts to bring them to justice are made.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

What manafort was charged for was ALREADY investigated by the fbi and no charges brought. The sc can bring charges from things ARISING from his investigation. Clearly this did not just ARISE from his investigation if it has already been investigated by the fbi.

Quibble away. What makes you think Mueller didn't uncover fresh incidents of money laundering during the investigation? [/gotcha!]

what makes you think the fbi did a shoddy job earlier?

What makes you think Manafort stopped laundering money?

No idea! I haven't seen anything that strongly suggests that, but could well be true. Don't care. It's enough that he did it. Fry him. Smear Trump by association. Doesn't bother me.

The "arising from" language is pretty interesting from a legal standpoint, though. Gives something fun and novel for lawyers to do while they rack up the billable hours. I don't know that it will prevail, but I think it's a strong argument. Wouldn't bet against it. Little words that don't seem to mean much, are actually a big deal when it comes to legalese. That's why contracts should always be carefully worded. And reviewed by a lawyer if feasible.