US President Hits Porn Actress with $20 million Lawsuit

a reply to: Sublimecraft

What, exactly, is the issue with a ho that #s for a living having sex with a CEO millionaire private citizen?

When it comes to somebody who's made no issue attacking the personal lives of others:



....and somebody who's gained the presidency in part through appealing to the religious and higher moral authority:



....with supporters who have, time and time again, interjected their moral two cents on previous presidencies (Larry Sinclair, Michelle Obama being a man, Obama's religious beliefs, Bill Clinton and Monica)..... then hypocrisy and double standards come into play. If Trump's supporters weren't on their high horses all this time this wouldn't be much news at all I assure you.

This isn't really about Trumps personal choices impacting the country. It's about double standards and character. Not hard to understand.

a reply to: gortex

This means there is definitely something to hide here from you republicans that voted this POS into office. Keep supporting this disgraceful, hypocritical, 10 commandment and constitution flouting garbage person who probably wants you dead if you serve him. Screw you republicans for voting in this clown jackass into office!

a reply to: richapau

Hm, some men like their women a little on the trashy side, and I guess some people like their President's that way too.

originally posted by: network dude
I'm not denying who Trump is or What he is, but when applying these standards, does JFK stand up to scrutiny? and rather than a historic angle, I could use whataboutism and ask if Billy Clinton would? If you have had a pulse in the last 20 years, you have an idea of who and what Trump is. He has done his best to make sure of that. And unless I missed it, he has never pretended to be anything other than what he is right now. If anything, he "kept it real".

It's unbelievable to me that people who call out double standards feel some need to acknowledge or apologize for 'whataboutism.'

Back in my day, people with double standards were jerks that deserved to be called out.

What a world we live in.

I make no apologies for 'whataboutism.' Double standards SUCK and they always have and always will.

a reply to: odzeandennz

making the number 2 fbi guy

Ex-FBI remember - or are you happy with your Government being attacked by ex-spooks?

a reply to: MotherMayEye

"Whataboutism"is a debating tactic used to change the topic of discussion. If Trump gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, Hillary is brought up to make the thread about her. There is nothing wrong with comparisons if the comparisons are fair and insightful. For example, JFK had an affair with a Hollywood icon. Trump had an affair with a B list porn star. "Everybody knew" about JFK and Marilyn, but it was conducted with discretion out of respect for the presidency. Trump had to pay hush money and that still wasn't enough to buy silence because he has brought the office into disrepute. Rather than simply dismiss the allegations, he wants to sue for breach of contract, thus confirming the allegations.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Ex-FBI remember - or are you happy with your Government being attacked by ex-spooks?

If the government is corrupt, law enforcement agencies are bound to expose it. You seem to be okay with a government run by foreign spooks.

a reply to: SaturnFX

Obama would qualify for the definition of Integrity.

Ya think - Like Seth Rich murder is convenient

www.datehookup.com...

In a 2009 shocker, Sinclair revealed in his book stunning revelations about Barack Hussein

Obama, including that he had had a gay lover in Illinois.

Shortly after addressing the National Press Club in Washington, DC in 2008, Sinclair revealed that Senior Advisor David Axelrod spearheaded a vindictive smear campaign against him, while Vice President Joe Biden and his son Beau arranged for his arrest after the NPC speech.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Please. Don't expect me to go to a domain called "datehookup.com.

a reply to: MiddleInsite

Why do you care about his sex life?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: MotherMayEye

"Whataboutism"is a debating tactic used to change the topic of discussion. If Trump gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, Hillary is brought up to make the thread about her. There is nothing wrong with comparisons if the comparisons are fair and insightful. For example, JFK had an affair with a Hollywood icon. Trump had an affair with a B list porn star. "Everybody knew" about JFK and Marilyn, but it was conducted with discretion out of respect for the presidency. Trump had to pay hush money and that still wasn't enough to buy silence because he has brought the office into disrepute. Rather than simply dismiss the allegations, he wants to sue for breach of contract, thus confirming the allegations.

I'm dying to hear you explain how it's Trumps fault Stormy Daniels decided to break her contract and speak publicly about Trump porking her. He did it with discretion and even paid her a good bit like a nice whore. If she was a nice whore, she would go away when he was done. She didn't. So it's Trump's fault she was a bad whore.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: MotherMayEye

"Whataboutism"is a debating tactic used to change the topic of discussion. If Trump gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, Hillary is brought up to make the thread about her. There is nothing wrong with comparisons if the comparisons are fair and insightful. For example, JFK had an affair with a Hollywood icon. Trump had an affair with a B list porn star. "Everybody knew" about JFK and Marilyn, but it was conducted with discretion out of respect for the presidency. Trump had to pay hush money and that still wasn't enough to buy silence because he has brought the office into disrepute. Rather than simply dismiss the allegations, he wants to sue for breach of contract, thus confirming the allegations.

I'm dying to hear you explain how it's Trumps fault Stormy Daniels decided to break her contract and speak publicly about Trump porking her. He did it with discretion and even paid her a good bit like a nice whore. If she was a nice whore, she would go away when he was done. She didn't. So it's Trump's fault she was a bad whore.

I do find it telling that the lefts new great hope is now a porn star and whore.

a reply to: gortex


Well be sure there are MANY on both sides and all between that like seeing Don do this lest their hush money recipients get any ideas. Besides like Stormy really isnt looking to cash in on this. Like she gives a crap about anything otherwise.

a reply to: network dude


What they were hoping for is moral outrage bait to trigger. lol. You know so many on the right forget what politics really is and snatch up their bibles in outrage. Forgetting naturally the challenges that many of the bible personalities were involved with.

a reply to: gortex

Question - Why would a Billionaire be Bangin' a Sleezy Porno Actress ? I doubt Mr. Trump was that Stupid in the Past .

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: butcherguy

Then why is Trump trying to hide that it happened and even lying about it? What did he have to hide if he's in an open relationship?

Embarassing details maybe?

Do you want all your legal, yet embarassing, life details exposed publicly?

I'm not a married man who has sex with pornstars who I force to sign NDA's.

Jesus, you people are literally a cult.

How can you not see this?

What about the porn star who had nothing but $$$ to gain by speaking about something private?

Tell me, in what world does it make any difference, unless you have something financial to gain...

It's not like he had her with him when he murdered someone, this is completely about her and her benefiting. She did, and then she broke that deal.

IF it even happened, which she denies. But flip flopping is easily ignored, because Trump!

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Thecakeisalie

He may have broken the law if it's deemed by the court that the payment was made to influence the outcome of the election which is why Trumps lawyer claims to have made the payment from his own funds.

Dredging up ancient history to sway the vote, that's all this was. If he had sex with her, she was a willing participant.

She is the one guilty of attempting to influence the outcome of the election.

a reply to: BrianFlanders

What if it's isn't true, and he doesn't feel saying "So what?" is appropriate?

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: howtonhawky

It isn't about what the court will or won't do to him it's what happens if the court find he lied about the payment , if the paper chase leads back to Trump it could be the beginning of the end for the Trump presidency ... he's playing a high stakes game.

He signed a hush agreement, so he is legally bound to lie about the payment. She's the one who violated the agreement.

I thought his signature was not on the agreement.

Which is what this is all about...

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Since no-one has come close in any previous thread on this subject, I'll ask it here in the hopes that a super sleweth has the answer and logic to back up their answer.

Q:
What, exactly, is the issue with a ho that #s for a living having sex with a CEO millionaire private citizen? How, exactly, does this effect your personal life, or the rule of law, or job creation, or infrastructure or the economy?

????????????????

Because TRUMP!!!!!11

Get with it man, if he left the toilet seat up, IMPEACH !!!!