-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: Skyfloating

Herman Wouk talks about encountering the "will not to believe" in either "Winds of War" or "War and Remembrance". If something is too awful to grasp or comprehend, human nature is to simply dismiss it.

You've been taught your whole life that leadership works for the community and is benevolent. Who in the early 40's wanted to believe the rumours that the German government (who was of course the bad guy, but were still "civilized" Europeans, after all) were not just treating Jews shabbily (shame that, but a centuries long tradition), but were actively and systematically rounding them up, transporting them on trains they needed to move war material, and gassing and cremating them. The very idea is so sordid and horrible that it wasn't to be believed until the evidence gathered after the war. What evidence did get released was dismissed as propaganda. The idea was just too shocking to take in.

How long did it take to break the wall of "the will not to believe" that not only are there bad Catholic priests (who wouldn't begrudgingly admit that), but that the Church was/is seemingly awash in them, and the Church itself at the highest levels was busy paying millions upon millions to keep the stories from the press and court rooms. Even when it started to come to light, it was mostly dismissed! And as it slowly became accepted, it still wasn't comprehended how large and wide-spread the problem was.

Who wants to believe trusted authorities are abusing the vulnerable? It takes time and more evidence to get past this ingrained prejudice in our minds. We're more likely to trust authorities simply because they are the authorities. The bigger the atrocity, the more horrid the events, the deeper the betrayal of the social contract, the less likely we are to believe it. Noone is immune to that.

So while we're quite willing to believe politicians and the media will lie to advance an agenda, politicians are corrupt, what have you, the idea there is a massive group of powerful people exploiting children and other victims and covering it all up, is going to be an uphill battle no matter how much evidence is gathered. Because the gap from corrupt to child trafficking is a huge gulf to bridge. And more importantly, noone wants to believe it. I certainly don't. But here we are.

2 new Q's
qanon.pub...

originally posted by: IAMTAT
2 new Q's
qanon.pub...

#985 relates to what was being discussed in this thread a few hours ago. Q confirms that the TIMESTAMP to his #977 post, is indeed "the key".

a reply to: IAMTAT

Looks like the plane crash was the correct interpretation then.

David Solomon, the man tipped to be the next chief executive of Goldman Sachs, does not only spend his evenings poring over the numbers. As the 56-year-old's Instagram account shows, he also has a second life as a DJ playing electronic dance music under the name D-Sol.

The banker is widely expected to take over the top job from Lloyd Blankfein. Analysts say Mr Solomon's accession became almost certain after a rival for the job, Harvey Schwarz, retired suddenly on Monday.

It is not clear when Mr Blankfein, 63, will step down from Goldman Sachs - one of the world's most influential banks. Mr Blankfein's predecessor Henry Paulson became Treasury secretary under George W Bush. The current holder of that post, Steven Mnuchin is also Goldman alumni, as is President Trump's outgoing economic adviser Gary Cohn.

www.bbc.com...

Politics makes strange bedfellows.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
2 new Q's
qanon.pub...

I haven't the foggiest what #983 is about. Even with the wiki the punctuation and symbols have me lost. Anyone have some insight?

The sword dance confers the obligation has been made to go to war as allies.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
COULD BE IMPORTANT!

Re: Q Post#977, !xowAT4Z3VQ, 28/03/2018 22:17:17, 825929:

HRC 2.12.09
Very BAD!
Q

I think Q's anti-sniffer approach may have also misled us on this post!

This is the first time this form of date has been used by Q, in almost a thousand posts, since 31st Oct 2017.

What if... this is NOT a date and HRC is not Hillary?

What if... this points to: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, Tweflth Session (2009), Agenda Item #2?

This agenda item was adopted and concerns:

This report is presented to the Human Rights Council pursuant to Council resolution 9/11. It contains a study on best practices for the effective implementation of the right to truth, in particular practices relating to archives and records concerning gross violations of human rights, and programmes on the protection of witnesses and other persons involved in trials connected with such violations.

I'm not au fait enough with the U.N. to pull out the most relevant points but below is my reading of it in relation to Q:

a) We have a Right to the Truth,
b) To implement the Right to Truth it is essential to have archives of the past:

The implementation of the right to the truth can only be effectively achieved when victims of human rights violations are able to assert their rights and can start the process of dealing with their past. The protection of archives and records concerning gross human rights violations, and the protection of witnesses and other persons involved in trials related to such violations are mutually reinforcing elements that are essential to nsuring the effective implementation of the right to the truth.

As they exercise their newly freed voices, they are likely to make four types of demands of the transitional State, namely demands for truth, justice, reparations and institutional reforms to prevent a recurrence of violence. Each of these demands relies on the availability of archives."

c) Hillary kept a lot of her records on an unsecured server that allowed her to withhold archived facts from government and the public,
d) Obamas presidential library will not make available original documents and only be electronic (allowing manipulation of archived truth),
e) Q continually tells us "ARCHIVE EVERYTHING". Is this partly to allow conformance by U.S. government with the UN resolution?

This resolution seems almost tailored to the situation we will face on taking down the deep state/cabal?

ETA from the link:

As part of the measures a State must undertake to protect the right to know, the Principles require the State to “ensure the preservation of,
and access to, archives concerning violations of human rights and humanitarian law” (ibid., principle 5).

What think you ATS?

I thought at the time that HRC stood for something other than Hillary and the odd separation of numbers using periods meant something. I didn't delve into it that deeply till I saw your post confirming that perhaps others were thinking the same thing.

As I did a little research, I came up with the possibility that it may pertain to the UN's Human Rights Council, Session 12 Resolution 2 in 2009 pertaining to: Cooperation with the United Nations, its representatives and mechanisms in the field of human rights.

www.ohchr.org...

Why would Q say "Very BAD!" ?

I wonder if it has anything to do with unaccompanied migrant children and adolescents and others pouring over our borders to flee their countries.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

It's a security test of the Infinity board and my guess is that they do it to confuse any sniffers.

a reply to: queenofswords
Read post #985 @ qanon.pub...

qanon.pub...

Q we really really need a government released update on human trafficking related arrests attributed to Trump's administration to compare to past administration numbers! Like yesterday.

Even if it is an early projection interim release.

People like Roseanne need it to show all the normies.

PLEASE Q!

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I am sure the Saudi's have the same ability to capture everything we are able to capture. With Saudi's hugh contributions to HRC no doubt they had a heads up on everything. She or her tech people couldn't have been ignorant of how the phone was routed.

a reply to: carewemust

I cant get 985 to come up yet...can someone post it?

I am sure somebody here mentioned the timestamp back when that crumb came out...

My internet is painfully slow for searching argh!

Does anyone else remember that or maybe whoever posted it is here?

Come One Guys.

Lets make sure what you post in this thread is accurate.

There are alot of folks watching this thread.

Be strong, but not rude.

Be kind, but not weak.

Be bold but don't bully.

Be humble, but not timid.

Be confident, but not arrogant.

Looks like Huber's past is important.

qanon.pub...

Busy night. There's already one more after this.

Q is mentioning Huber and Sessions. Like i suspected all along the recusal wasn't necessary but Sessions had to play his role to work on the IG report. Sessions comes out and declares that his recusal is null and void because of a loophole he himself created without anyone noticing. The reactions would be priceless and hilarious.

a reply to: queenofswords

Has it been pointed out that Alison Des Forges, a human rights investigator and an expert on the Rwandan genocide, was also killed when Colgan Air Flight 3407 crashed? I remember reading that the Clintons were connected to some really horrific acts, that occured in Rwanda.

Source: en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IAMTAT
2 new Q's
qanon.pub...

#985 relates to what was being discussed in this thread a few hours ago. Q confirms that the TIMESTAMP to his #977 post, is indeed "the key".

Something just occurred to me while reading that, and I apologize if anyone brought this up earlier in the thread. The timestamp was key.

What if the date 2.12.09 was actually written in European format? And it was actually December 2, 2009 that Q was referencing in regards to Hillary?

After looking up that date, this is what HRC was up to that day:

12/02/09 Administration's Strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan;  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; Opening Remarks Before the United States Senate Armed Services Committee; Washington, DC
12/02/09 International Day for the Abolition of Slavery;  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; Washington, DC
12/02/09 Interview With Brian Williams of NBC Nightly News;  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; Washington, DC
12/02/09 Interview With Katie Couric of CBS Evening News;  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; Washington, DC
12/02/09 U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan;  Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; Opening Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee; Washington, DC

2009-2017.state.gov...

And out of those five events, one in particular stands out to me. "International Day for the Abolition of Slavery."

From her press statement:

Modern slavery – be it bonded labor, involuntary servitude, or sexual slavery – is a crime and cannot be tolerated in any culture, community, or country. Sadly, slavery persists around the globe, including within the United States. Every day millions of men, women, and children of all ages face forced labor and sexual exploitation, as well as brutal violence.”

Oh the irony.

The other scenario with the plane crash in Buffalo makes perfect sense too. But when Q emphasized the timestamp in his reply, that wasn't an undisputed confirmation for me. Why would it be in the international time format? I have to keep digging for that. Though the Clinton's were certainly in Amsterdam the night before. (12/1)

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Didn't he say "Russian Collusion"?

If so, the investigation at this point bears no real resemblance to that anymore. It looks like Mueller has done into other avenues.

**EDIT**



Any existing investigations or future investigations into the campaigns for president ...

a reply to: carewemust

Yeah, when I dug up the plane crash. Those were the two names that stuck out to me.