-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

I usually don't have the attention span for long articles, or video documentaries. But this suggested reading that Q provided the link to in post #982 tonight, was quite good.

www.nationalreview.com...

It tied Hillary/FBI/Steele/UK/Dossier info into an easy to understand timeline of events.

Dedicated forum is probably wet dream. What we can do right now is to use prefixes in thread titles. Something like "Q task/NXIVM". This will help at least with search problem of ATS engine. Still there are topics not allowed on ATS (pizzagate) + problem of storing more then 10% of original article.

In spite of this I would be happy with combined approach:

1. this large thread is dedicated to general news and discussion + specific digs results
2. if some large topic emerge and we have enough meat, lets start dedicated thread (preferably with prefix)
3. Wiki holds everything what is not allowed on ATS ... raw meat storage, research base, sandbox.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

It is true. ATS isn't like it used to be.

That is kind of why I really love this thread!

These topics too and someone to tie it all together with a neat little bow?

I have to be careful I don't fall into the cult mentality...lol.

The world has changed, it's not even just ATS.

Q is shaking things up. Even if it's fake it sure has brought a lot of people together and brought up a lot of old topics in a new light.

That in itself is enough for me to be along for the ride, either way.

I know there are people who have been waiting on new forums...but this subject matter is so in vogue right now!!

I almost think ATS would be missing out not to cash in on that and funnel all these people looking for a place to gather into a forum.

It's a lot of people, they may not be traditional ATS people, but they can learn? Maybe...

Wikileaks / Assange "is a" leaker.

And it could certainly be argued there 'should' be a wikileaks forum category.

The stuff from there and all that has amounted to hundreds if not thousands of threads.

You want a Q forum, why should Q have one when Wikileaks doesnt?

Actually, you want a Q forum? Well get Q to post his "drops" here. ATS has always had some "Conspiracy Celebrities" type sections.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

It's neat how Q is making so many people use their mind in a whole new way. I love it when he/she/it gives marching orders, in addition to information. (i.e. Release the Memo!...spread the word!)

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes that would be wicked. If Q posted here.

The wikileaks thing, ya there should be a wkileaks forum but we arent even allowed to link to wikileaks from here right?

I am surprized Q has been allowed actually.

I've been a lurker on this thread since the beginning.
This particular thread is more of a collaboration thread, a research thread.
Most of the posters here aren't writers, they're researchers.
There have been many, many thread worthy discoveries uncovered in the process of researching the Q drops.
There have also been many threads authored on ATS that originated from the research done in this thread.
Where are they?
Well, they posted, got some attention, got shilled and fell from view in most cases.
I would hate to see the research that goes on in this thread become diluted and scattered by peeps making a jillion Q research threads.
There's no Alex jones board on ATS because he has his own platform it's called infowars.
Q has a platform in infinity, but the chans are noisy, hard to navigate, and collaboration of the quality shown here would be difficult if not impossible there unless your an autist lol
If a writer sees a subject come up in this thread they think is worthy of its own thread, by all means make a thread. But expecting researchers who are collaborating to shift gears and author a thread isn't helping the research groove.

As far as a dedicated Q Forum goes, my feeling is that the wiki and spreadsheet Rel and Jan have done such great work with is sufficient to keep on top of this Q phenomenon.
The tools are already here and mostly in place for a person to learn, follow along and contribute if they choose. More stuff just make things more complicated and even more overwhelming for those just discovering Q.

To reiterate my main point, I would hate to see the research here become scattered and diluted, and the wonderful sense of collaboration this thread is blessed with lost.
Thank you all for your hard work and wonderful minds!

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss



No, IgnoranceIsntBlisss says, as much as many of us might dislike him and his apparent agenda, it has it's limits.

I do not dislike him so count me out of "many of us", "bride of Christ", and speak for yourself. I have zero problems with him being skeptical to both Q and the way this thread has turned out. To me the thread looks more and more like just one big and unfocused mess, almost impossible to follow. It's the way mega threads always turn out, so they suck.

And this is not directed at you particulary but I also want to say that find the wink, wink emojis and posts about PMs between some people in this tread annoying, it adds to the "cult" like feeling. FFS, if a poster wants to send a PM, just do it, the whole board doesn't need to know it if you have something super secret and special to tell someone. It's like some demonstrative whispering game, very off putting, ugh.

I guess the regulars in this thread just have to excuse an ordinary peasant like me who is interested in the Q breadcrumbs but is definetely NOT into cults and is even less any "mother of the messianic age" like you, whatever that is supposed to mean.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes that would be wicked. If Q posted here.

If Q posted here, there are a few ATS members who would be in Shock and Awe.

a reply to: carewemust

That memo was a crap shoot.

Not good when supposedly this is an insider.

Is why i would caution against vesting so much in it having to be a Trump staffer.

In fact you want 'win' I'd be trying to separate it from such an idea.

Unless this is all just intended to be a partisan war / get Trump re-elected because he's cool / etc gimmick.

BUT if you all really want to defeat "The Corruption" (which the GOP is every bit a part of as is the DNC), well isolating yourselves from them (the brainwashed "liberals"), instead of building bridges, that's how you'll never 'win'. Which when thats the impression the whole thing gives me, then thats why you've seen me so quick to contempt with this "movement".

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes that would be wicked. If Q posted here.

The wikileaks thing, ya there should be a wkileaks forum but we arent even allowed to link to wikileaks from here right?

I am surprized Q has been allowed actually.

The story is that the site hosting company forbids linking to "stolen" documents.

a reply to: MostlyReading

I dunno I think you ARE one of the regulars

The thread does need skeptics. Also it is messy and hard to keep up.

It does still seem to flow, each of us are bugged by different things.

The majority keep coming back! It has a good drawing in factor, enough to keep me (and several others) coming back day after day.

I cannot say any other threads have done that for me around here in a long time.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Yes that would be wicked. If Q posted here.

If Q posted here, there are a few ATS members who would be in Shock and Awe.

If Q posted here, very few people would believe and accept that it's actually him/her/them.

Even if Trump tweeted a screenshot from ATS, many members here would still call it a hoax.

Sadly.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

If it didn't sound so contrived, and he wasn't flaunting it on social media and practically screaming for attention to himself, I'd tend to agree with you. Oh so horrified...but has the time and wherewithal to take photos and post about it. Yeah, personally I'm not buying it.

Interesting...my phone keeps wanting to correct "social" to "suicidal". Suicidal media. Well...that's pretty funny, since it's their inability to stay out of the spotlight that seems to expose so many of these people for what they are.

But hey...I could be totally off and he could be a really swell guy who just really wants to see justice done. He could just be incredibly resilient and have a really lenient and laid back emergency medical team.

For him to have undergone such alleged trauma and not be sedated or isolated from all external chaos at the very least, his injuries had to be extremely superficial. They also must have identified and caught the perp pretty quick, to let people with cameras that close to the victim of an attempted homicide so quickly following the attack.

Hollywood works that way. Real life does not. We'll see in the end. But I personally think he's a weasel. I've watched numerous video clips of him recently and he just oozes bull# from every follicle. They own him.

I don't fault him for it. I understand. However...he's allowing them to parade him to save his own ass, and for that I cannot respect him. I'd have possibly respected him more if he had left Corey Haim out of it. He was always the vulnerable one.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: carewemust

I think you might have to wait a while for some of the stuff like HIV to show up.

Or uranium poisoning. Putin killed a former Russian spy in 2011 with uranium infused bolongna. It took weeks for his hair to start falling out, which was the first tip-off that something wasn't right. Two months later, RIP.

That actually would be pretty damned scary. They have the cures for HIV and all the other baddies. But uranium poisoning...yikes. I might actually feel bad for the little weasel if that turned out to be the case.😜😜😜

I see now it was a needle stabbing not a knife attack? I'm not even going to bother trying to load that crap again with all those ads to look at it. I think he's a weasel...but if they did inject him with something I still wouldn't want him to suffer.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

No, IgnoranceIsntBlisss says, as much as many of us might dislike him and his apparent agenda, it has it's limits.

I'm here to get Hillary elected in 2020, and by monitoring your activities is how I intend to do it.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I agree with you in that this shouldn't be partisan and if it is then it really cannot be about killing corruption.

To be fair there has been info dropped by Q about people from both sides for sure!

The whole Q thing is generally seen as a Trump support movement.

I was never a Trump supporter, I am a friggin card carrying liberal!

I find myself seeing Trump in a bit of a different light through this, if he REALLY is going to eliminate a bunch of sex trafficking and pedos I might really be able to support him.

Same for a lot of the other stuff that is being purposed by Q.

You are so right about "the bridge" to the left. If these things really do happen many people on the left would support him too.

People are so blinded by what the MSM feeds them and so polarized right now they mostly would rather die than support Trump.

Q crumbs and they way they are set up are geared towards people doing their own research. That is the only way people might be able to accept some of these things.

If we get to a point where Q team come forward and/or some really big BOOMS happen like big names being charged with supporting evidence. Like, say, real documents outlining deep state behind false flags come out

It has to shift things.


If they actually try to kill the corruption there will be huge backlash, they will try to kill Trump they will fabricate things to try to take him and supporters down, they are already doing this ...daily.

It is entirely possible that no president can pull off the things being hinted at by Q.

If enough people get behind it, the movement to end the evil doing corruption, maybe it can be done.

It shouldn't be partisan and maybe it is hope porn designed to brainwash followers into supporting Trump.

I am good with that, as I think most people would be, IF and only if we get results.

Time will tell and in the meantime it is eye opening to play along...

I'm not doing it blindly, I am still skeptical.

Small things are happening.

There is a big part of me that fears the outcome too. I mean Trump can't be president forever...

What if this is all just a scam so Trump can regulate the media, the internet etc. (Accuse your enemy of doing what you yourself are really doing)

I am hopeful but cautious.


If Trump pulls off some impossible corruption busting publically then Q might cease to be so partisan.

Here's hoping.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I didn't mean it like that, but a perspective, a POV, when all the information is absorbed and synthesized. There's a lot of data embedded in the pursuit of this line of research and inquiry.

Each to a one, but where we go one we go all and by we I'm referring to WE, THE PEOPLE, and citizens of the world in my case as a non-American.

There's a TON of data when the crumbs are joined the dots connected and it does give a person, who's not a cynic and a skeptic, a larger context and frame of reference by which to evaluate the news and certain current events.

I guess you wouldn't understand. Can't understand, thus all the mockery.

You just don't get it, not even a little bit.

a reply to: MostlyReading

Forgive me, not enough context.

By "mother of the messianic age", I'm referring to a kind of participatory eschatology, or the bringing about of the end of one world, and the creation of a new one as an active historical participant of progressive change, which by it's very nature is transformative, and decisive. I picked it up from this

Mad Pride, Prophets, and the Revival of the Messianic Vision

Further, I don't really take myself that seriously, so it's intended as a playful kind of thing with a sense of humor.

By Bride of Christ i meant a marriage of Spirit of God and man where Christ (see the link in my signature) is something that you just can't help but fall in love with once you discover the true nature of his Wisdom and Grace, character and charm. In seeking God as love, we often find that he was chasing us all along like some sort of romantic pursuit, even in our follies and foibles and shortcomings.

Sorry, poor communications on my part.

There are other dimensions to many of these considerations, like the true nature of Liberty and what underpins a civil and sane society and drives the arrow of civilized progress as a truly just and noble historical pursuit.

I'm not trying to sell these things, only try to express and speak from the POV of a certain amount of comprehension.

We have to give one another the benefit of the doubt in other words.

The truth itself is the juggernaght in everyone's road, and in history's road these days.

I ask that people take one another both infinitely more seriously on the one hand, and infinitely less so on the other so that we can still have fun.

I was just horsing around, while continuing to teach, and to learn and grow.

I meant no offense.


Re: Thread. Lots of people like this thread and these threads so let's just keep on keeping on shall we?

Post #977

HRC 2.12.09
---------------------

This was the day of Colgan Air Flight 3807 crashed in Buffalo, NY. Out of the crash victims, 2 names are significant:

Alison Des Forges and Beverly Eckert.

Eckert was a 9/11 widow and activist.

Des Forges was a human rights activist, but more specifically, was a senior advisor for the African continent at Human Rights Watch. She was an authority on the Rwandan Genocide. Tie that in with the Clintons' reluctance to act on the genocide after being given ample reports from Des Forges and her colleagues.

www.theguardian.com...

And that's enough to get her Arkancided. I think that's what Q is trying to point out. The Beverly Eckert factor may have just been a bonus kill for those psychpaths.