-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

originally posted by: Outlier13

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Nobody does threads any more, everything just gets pasted into this memory hole and forgotten?

Is somebody planning on putting all the materials together on that NXIMVwhatever cult, at least? That's another (very recent one?) that made some headlines but Q mentioned it and now instead of become a thread it just goes into this memory hole?

This is precisely why Q needs its own forum. We could easily catalogue all of the ancillary items Q has brought to light. How do we get the mods to create a Q forum? As far as I am aware the Q thread(s) are the longest running continuous threads on ATS.

Great Idea! Has anyone submitted that request formally to the Mods of ATS?

Whatever happened to Skyfall007?

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

tat did.
no response that i know of from TPTB

a reply to: Outlier13

Well imagine if we decided we REALLY like Alex Jones so we'll have just one big thread where we all post in all the stuff he says everyday on the radio show.

lol

And then imagine how people would feel if everything that AJ talks about were from there on designated as "AJ Related".

You'd put off (even more) the masses already assumed to be at odds with the general direction (in both cases it would be 'liberals'), people that have been talking about that kind of stuff for years in advance would grow offended, then people trying to build a construct of the world instead of see one person / place / thing as part of this subject or that subject, instead its all percived as part of... a news source. As thats what Q is doing is aggregating news, for the most part. Right? If anything, we all used to call it (like a year ago) stuff along the lines of the NWO (TPTB, etc) [as in WHO we're talking about, not who mentioned it).

Quite frankly, Cult of Personality stuff just rubs some of us ENTIRELY wrong. Whether its a president, a musician, a celebrity, a news source, or whatever other kind of icon.

So why does Q really needs it own forum? Does Alex Jones need his own forum? He talks about all kinds of different subjects everyday, along side never ending news cycle. We have a whole forum here already all the categories. If this is a news aggregator thread then fine do everything you've been doing exactly as you've been doing it, but when a good story comes up herein but never gets posted elsewhere that's what I'd call backwardsness. Unless the whole point is to just horde information like some cool club, but this is about 'waking people up', right?

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: Outlier13

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Nobody does threads any more, everything just gets pasted into this memory hole and forgotten?

Is somebody planning on putting all the materials together on that NXIMVwhatever cult, at least? That's another (very recent one?) that made some headlines but Q mentioned it and now instead of become a thread it just goes into this memory hole?

This is precisely why Q needs its own forum. We could easily catalogue all of the ancillary items Q has brought to light. How do we get the mods to create a Q forum? As far as I am aware the Q thread(s) are the longest running continuous threads on ATS.

Great Idea! Has anyone submitted that request formally to the Mods of ATS?

Let's make a formal appeal right now. There will literally be multiple threads upon threads all neatly tucked into the Q! board. Here are a few threads that quickly come to mind:

Q Acronyms
Q History from the beginning
Latest Q posts Daily Discussion thread - Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc...
Etc...

We would have a multitude of threads where each topic could be discussed without getting lost in these massively long threads. There are so many pieces to this pie and they deserve their own threads.

Mods...what are the criteria for getting a !Q forum?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

but AJ doesnt claim to $#i+post from AF1 over NK, Camp David and the WH.
this is a tad different

a reply to: dashen

I'd prefer a Q forum here to having to build or move to another forum somewhere else ie: that's what Skyfall007 was supposed to be doing (just messaged him).

A Q forum on ATS would be amazing and wonderful.

Would bring a lot of traffic, good traffic, and yeah there might be some blackhat eyeballs, but they're already here anyway surely.

ATS' stock with me would go way up if they did create a QAnon related forum.

Do you think it would scare them?

So many of these emerging stories and research are Q specific, so it would be great to have a whole plethora of threads in a Q forum.

Here's how I'd do it if I had been all into this from the beginning: "New" "exclusive" topic comes up, then everyone pastes what they find for a few days (at some point you all move on to the next thing to googe fu right), figure out making sure each 'big thing' gets tabulated into a nice OP. Then keep a hyperlinked list of said pieces that keeps getting pasted in every so many pages where anybody can quote the code and and the next one. "Category Threads" like I was saying the other day. Major pieces as well. Then with that handy list all linked up, when people have a new bit of material to paste they can paste it in there to add to it. Each thread becomes a reference tool, instead of just one super huge archive where a bunch of people were talking about a bunch of stuff.

At the very least I'd intend that to have something to show for (besides 800 pages nobody is going to go back and read), but really I know when I put a lot of work in its to be a reference tool for people to use. What I was just describing above, its how I try to maintain my own threads, so like my "Dark Electioneering" thread, or my original 2016 'Wars of Drugs' piece, whenever I notice new threads herein, or stuff thereout, I try and be sure to link the threads in, or quotes from the article , or embed the video that I noticed about it. Now I dont do this with *every" thread I have made, but the big major subject pieces I do that so they're more and more in total the ultimate reference, as well as bumps the topic back up legitimately (as ATS itself is a memory hole if nobody ever bumps major pieces).

Now I've done a half way decent job maintaining that, during the periods when I could actually manage it, but imagine if this whole contingent of you were all keeping the gaggle of major reference threads constantly stoked. It'd gain this whole effort a ton more respect, there'd be a array of -different- yet related threads constantly being bumped, etc.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Should there be an Infowars forum?

How is this any different?

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Re: "Shine the light bright doa-?" Could this be bringing Monsanto/GM food into the fray? Department of Agriculture!

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Apples to oranges mate. Q is an entirely different animal and there is so much more ancillary information to be dissected that cramming it all into a series of lengthy threads means much of the information gets lost in the fray.

You always have the option to not click on the forum.

a reply to: dashen

So then Trump should have his own forum?

Everything that goes on with Trump is already mixed up in every other subject.

Much like Q talks about all the same stuff we're all already talking about anyways.

And actually AJ is 'hooked up with' Trump and more overtly than, well, I'm still waiting for someone to do a quality OP listing out with the evidence that Q is for reals. I see people ask, this person or that person mentions some stuff, then it moves on.

Note it isnt just me you have to convince, if you really look into what I'm doing here you should be seeing the flaws in the approach I keep bringing up and where to make improvements. Or everyone can go "F him for rocking the boat" and completely ignore the silver linings (I do realize I can rub people wrong so apologies lol).

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Why would you be opposed to having multiple topical threads all related in some way to Q research and related news placed in one forum?

After your complaints about these longggg threads, that doesn't make any sense.

Also AJ doesn't have direct access to the POTUS on a daily basis.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

But but...it IS all indexed and we are archiving all of it!! Several ppl are!

Then there is the wiki...it's literally incredible AND searchable.

I am thinking of the forum because there is just SO much info contained in these drops, trying to read them then all the research.

It's not really the same as Alex Jones because, it's an insider leaking info.

So a forum with topics , to more easily organize makes more sense I think...

Perhaps we will have to wait for Q to come out and announce who they are before we might make that happen here...maybe not?

Mods?

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Ignore his agenda. A Q forum is a good idea. Look forward to hearing Mods/BO's reply on it.

What a wonderful research forum it would be. So many avenues to pursue.

If it happens, I will personally thank IgnoranceIsntBlisss and make a dedication to him in it, for being @ cause in it's formation! JK

He's like, "this is a joke, don't do it this way, index everything and make more threads on ATS" so we say, ok, let's petition the Mods and the ownership to make a Q forum! "Oh no! that's a terrible idea for the love of God NO, don't do THAT!?"

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Within the Q forum you could have your own thread titled:

Debunking Q.

Then you could have your own little sandbox.

a reply to: Outlier13

800 and growing pages of DISCUSSIONS? Nobody is going to go back and read thru all that. Okay maybe less than one percent. People cant even reply to the legacy threads. And what percent of the material on each page in this goliath are actually quality content to read in hindsight?

Now if we could search for terms within the thread that would be one thing. But we cant. And its more than -one thread- anyways. But in the offshoot threads those could be more towards all crisp quality reference materials; this thread being the "Scratchpad" used for building them.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

so the indexes in the past few op's dont do a thing for you? not even the memes?
they were some good ones man

nvm - redundant

a reply to: carewemust

Just a thought...

Did the swearing in use a Bible? Or some other book?

This is the book that she used for the oath, which is wrong depth and shape for a Bible:


Here is the book that was handed back to Chelsea afterwards, LOOKS DIFFERENT but still wrong width for a bible?