It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: wylekat
Maybe take a shower and clean up your residence?
originally posted by: wylekat
Also- Clown Burger has these cute signs in various places "You have a half hour to eat, then leave" (paraphrased). I am not going to get in, wait forever for food, and then be forced to dump it down my throat in 30 minutes, because corporate policy dictates it. Especially *that* slop.
People don’t call the police for no reason
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: dollukka
You can't have an effective police-state if you allow regular people to feed or shelter those who are hungry or homeless.
As a society we have abdicated our responsibility to take care of those less fortunate and we have shifted that burden to the state.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
In my defense, it was only liberal posters defending the actions of the restaurant so I was half right about the scenario.
The hypocrisy stands tall...
I agree about hypocrisy. It gets really glaring when tax free charities can stand outside store front entrances 'legally' panhandling around Christmas.
But if a disheveled looking person tries ringing a bell with a 'collection' basket, they get cited for panhandling.
Who needs the money more , a mega charity or a poor person.
Oh nevermind. Just saw it.
originally posted by: Jefferton
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: dollukka
I f#cking new it! CALI!!! Liberal heaven with the worst hypocrisy possible!
This has nothing to do with California, or Liberals.
This is a business enforcing their right to refuse service.
Maybe the restaurant had a prior experience with this particular homeless person. Who knows??