‘Time traveller from 2030’ PASSES lie detector with SHOCK claims over AI and Trump

a reply to: Sillyolme

Doomed for anyone who doesn't like a great economy I guess.

originally posted by: hombero
This means nothing. Stress detector tests are easily fooled and haven't been admissible in court to prove veracity of claims for a long time. That's if there even was a stress detector present at all, big green words aren't proof of that, let alone that this man is a time traveller.

The credibility of one who would take this of proof of anything.... Not good.

I don't think anyone has taken this with anything other than a grain of salt. My point was to open up a discussion about time travel in itself as I am very interested in such a feat.

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

The data is there. Didn't matter where I was. I was at the coast of Virginia. New York had required emissions tests starting in the late eighties. The air quality is measured.
Gee dude I remember bright sunny days too but air equity was worse then. Hey wait. Trump dumped all those environmental laws so that special air from the eighties that was cleaner and cooler (¿) will return. Happy days.

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

I'm retired myself so every days a holiday.

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

That wasn't the parameters but sure I saw one.
Ill get it .

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

Ok no. I didn't. I saw newborn pics. But that doesn't prove anything. There are no pictures of me pregnant for my first and last child and only one for the middle one that was taken at my baby shower at my office in New York. Not every woman wants to show the bump and it really was considered poor taste once upon a time. That belly was covered. Women didn't wear tight fitting clothing to show they were pregnant. They wore maternity clothes that flowed over the bump without accentuating it.
Anyway. This is off topic. And I sense getting ugly .

BULLLLL SHIIIITTTT

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

That's not going to help him in the investigation which is what I meant by doomed.

The video had words that say he was not lying... so of course it's real.

And of course the near future society sent some "bro" to convince us he's legit and warn us... not some respectable professional type. Why would they send an egghead?

And the relative of Dr King he says becomes pres doesn't exist now... maybe she's living in the wilds?

sigh

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

The data is there. Didn't matter where I was. I was at the coast of Virginia. New York had required emissions tests starting in the late eighties. The air quality is measured.
Gee dude I remember bright sunny days too but air equity was worse then. Hey wait. Trump dumped all those environmental laws so that special air from the eighties that was cleaner and cooler (¿) will return. Happy days.

I was in Shreveport, Louisiana until July 4, 1985 when we moved 25 miles east to a small country town. The air smelled far more fresh back then where I was. Every once in a while I'll get a whiff of pine trees and it takes me back to those days. Sometimes I'll see a golden sunset and it takes me back to the end of the day when I lived in Shreveport. But those times are so rare now they're almost extinct.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I'm not gonna get ugly here. I didn't know you were a female.

originally posted by: SaturnFX

originally posted by: rickymouse
If a person believes something and has no feeling they are lying, they can pass a lie detector test. Some people actually know how to fool the lie detectors, some just are believers in their delusion. That is why lie detector tests are not allowed as evidence in court, some people are even trained by our intelligence to be able to show they are telling the truth on these kind of tests.

The reason lie detectors remain a somewhat useful tool is the belief by some that they work as designed, so they will admit to all sorts of things beforehand in order to not fail. In these regards. Some people also feel really guilty about stuff that they did and in those instances, it does work as their lie stresses them out. But overall, its crap.

Also, if someone gets nervous easily and is not positive of what they did or saw, the lie detector can create a false positive. They may not have done anything, but just the guilt of not doing something to help can make them riled up.

It does help law enforcement more in eliminating suspects though.

originally posted by: Baddogma
The video had words that say he was not lying... so of course it's real.

And of course the near future society sent some "bro" to convince us he's legit and warn us... not some respectable professional type. Why would they send an egghead?

And the relative of Dr King he says becomes pres doesn't exist now... maybe she's living in the wilds?

sigh

Lol, yeah it's not very believable at all. But I wanted to open up a discussion about the possibilities of time travel. Not that the U.S. sent some brotato chip here to tell us all the future.

originally posted by: dothedew
I've watched a few videos about this guy (and some others featuring some other self proclaimed time travelers) and came to the same conclusion - lie detector/stress detectors can be easily faked and manipulated, and I'm waiting for some sort of concrete evidence to come by.

Out of all the information one would have access to in the future, there should be no issue introducing a single piece of verifiable evidence to support your claim that you're from the future: Quotes form a book that hasn't been written yet, the title of a movie or show that has yet to come out, some small and mildly irrelevant news piece from a specific date, etc.

Big time predictions like this, presidential predictions and such (that have 50/50 of happening) and that people have to wait years to find out the conclusion.... just don't seem too reliable, IMO

How can you prove you're from the future by naming movies or tv shows, or stating quotes from a book that is yet to be written?

To verify these facts one would then have to travel into the future to prove these things actually exist.

And what if they do? Maybe they got the idea from the alleged time traveller making such claims?

Sorry, just found this kinda confusing - I could make up somethign right now and say it's a tv show from the future, how do we prove or disprove it?

a reply to: rickymouse

Reminds me of the time I was in the 8th grade and the principal walked in to ask who was responsible for something done in the bathroom. Although I was innocent, when he looked at me, as he did the entire class, I could feel my face turn red because the attention seemed focused on me. I'm sure he probably thought I was guilty.

The only shocking think is that this is being considered "news" at all. I saw the story on a Google News banner list today. Clearly they are trying to galvanize voters against Trump.

"Ilana Remikee" is obviously a partial homonym/acronym of "Leah Remini". Exactly the kind of fake name -- but based on a celebrity -- that a teenager would make up.

Immediately suspect of accuracy of any report that uses “lie detector” in lieu of polygraph examination...

a reply to: EternalShadow


utter bollox

mr obama - was an illinios state senator 10 years prior to his presidential election - thats NOT " nowhere "

Some interesting anagrams can be made from Ilana Remikee. Just saying....

However this guy and his claims are obviously bunk so...

a reply to: Thirty6BelowZero

Is there a transcript of this video or a list of all the predictions that this guy has made?