-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

a reply to: purplemer

You're skirting my question. Where does Q say that there will be "justice for 911"?

That shouldn't be hard to show.

Just a copy and past, add a link, anything.

You just keep making the same statement over and over.

In all the Q posts, you will find the string "9/11" one time. Post #259 (no justice mentioned)

In all the Q posts, you will find the string "911" two times. Posts #43 and #620. (a reference to the emergency number, and and anonymous ID.

So the question still stands, on what are you basing your assumptions?

My contention is that you are wishing for something to be addressed that Q never mentioned. Anywhere. You stated, "If Q is talking about 911 justice and fails to mention Mossad then there looks like a problem". Well, he never did, so then there isn't a problem, by your own standard.

I'll go back to my original statement and say that the primary objective, today, is to clean up our own house first. Putting things in order to make a better life begins with an examination of self. In this case, the Q posts are a mirror. It's being held up in front of US as a means for self-examination. How we choose to deal with what we see depends on largly on how far and wide public perception changes. Perception is reality.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Thank you for long reply. Will dont have time to answer that. Will do later

Something we may have missed at CPAC.

5) The panel on feminism was followed by an all-star panel on the topic “#TrumpedUp: Unmasking the Deep State.” It was moderated by Andy McCarthy and included Byron York, Sara Carter and Chuck Ross. The discussion was excellent, although most was familiar to obsessive followers of the news. McCarthy posed the question, why is it so hard to get to the bottom of the Obama scandals, with both Congress and the Department of Justice ostensibly in Republican hands? The answer, Andy thinks, is that bureaucratic imperatives appear to trump everything else, even with Trump’s appointees.

There is hope, however: the DOJ Inspector General’s report, which will focus on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary’s server fiasco, is due in April or May. Twenty-seven leak investigations are ongoing, and Phase 2 of Devin Nunes’s investigation is under way as well. The House Intelligence Committee has posed questions to former Obama officials, and if they fail to respond they will be subpoenaed. This group includes John Brennan, James Comey and James Clapper. This brought a rousing ovation from the crowd.

Byron York made a great point: those who allegedly lied to the FBI during its Trump/Russia investigation are being criminally charged. On the other hand, people like Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Hillary herself obviously lied to the FBI during the illegal server investigation. Those individuals apparently got nothing but the FBI’s thanks for participating.

I am now off to YouTube to see if this panel mentioned has been posted. It may prove to be worth bringing here.



Scratch that. I'll bring it here anyway.

a reply to: purplemer

You are looking more and more like a concern troll. IF that is not your intention, and IF that is not what you actually are, maybe you should not be posting these same lenghty and very concerned tirades over and over again. Enough.

I also find it extremely condescending and insulting to the great contributers in this thread, people who are working very hard doing and sharing research, that you use the words "role playing game".

a reply to: MostlyReading

Responding to trolls in this thread is not advised, MostlyReading. Ignore.

a reply to: ketsuko

At about 9 minutes in the guy at the end points out that the questions being asked by both Nunes and Grassley could corroborate the dossier just as easily as disprove it, but still they are being stonewalled by the DoJ and FBI.

Around 14 minutes McCarthy has a point:

Putin did not create confusion or chaos by supporting the guy he thought would win. Instead, he created it by supporting the groups opposed to that person, and that's the narrative and the evidence we've seen in the press lately.

a reply to: purplemer

Purple...There are so many different ideas about who and what Q may, or may not, be.

Trump insider group
Military Intelligence
Mossad
AI
Clown psyop
Ruskies
JA
Kim Dotcom

Smart, fat kid in mom's basement

I will wager that just about everyone participating in this thread has their own idea about Q.
I certainly have developed my own theory...to the point that I am about 75% certain I'm right.

But don't expect me to tell anyone (Besides...you probably wouldn't believe me).

Early on, in one of the first iterations of this thread, a consensus was reached that, for better or worse, exposing Q would be counterproductive to the continuance of the valuable clues we've been receiving, participating in and, yes, enjoying the hunt and chase which results.

My personal feeling...and I can only speak for myself...is that Q is not an adversary to truth. Were I to begin to feel Q was...I would cease to participate.

That is a choice all of us are free to make.

YOU are frustrated and/or suspicious that Q doesn't reference Israel (although I do vaguely remember an early Q post where it was mentioned that Israel was making some internal changes regarding working with the Trump administration's goals--or something to that effect. I could be wrong).

I can respect that...I haven't had some of my own interests directly addressed yet, though perhaps, like your own, they eventually may be. Nevertheless, that doesn't make me doubt or seek to expose Q out of frustation.

Right now...I'm enjoying the ride I am along for. I'm also enjoying the diverse company of those accompanying me on this journey.

All said...I hope you stick around.
Q has often stressed the need for patience...as what we are participating in/witnessing is as much an important process...as it is an eventual destination.

I'm good with that.

16 minutes, Chuck (guy on the end) brings up the connections between the meeting at Trump Tower (Don Jr and Veselnitskaya) and Fusion GPS. Then he talks about Bruce and Nellie Ohr.

We must not use the words trolls or shills, but at the same time, we are under no obligation to reply to anyone if they're not adding any value or are repeating the same tirade over and over again. Think twice before clicking reply!

originally posted by: MostlyReading
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex


Sorry but your post tells me nothing whatsoever about any possible motive for inducing this heart attack, and nothing about how/why this Bollywood star may be connected to information in the Q breadcrumbs.

It's just random information about a random person so far, and since this thread is all about research it should not surprise you that you are asked to provide some kind of context when you post something as random as this. If people like me didn't want to learn and gain knowledge, they would not be in this thread to begin with.

Hope this clears things up for you.

This is kind of a confusing thread to follow in the traditional way, it's a combination of "brain storming" Q and Q anons messages that amazingly seems to connect dots by sparking certain members to research and consider the CONNECTIONS between things that have turned out to have an incredible synchronicity and meaning. Is what's happening all a Coincidence ?

This is a rabbit hole that requires a leap of faith,and while we need to keep each other "in check", lol, so to speak, and consider every angle and try our best to make educated ( whatever that means ) contributions to this thread , the goal isn't to "Bust" people for a lack of "evidence" or shut them down.....As Q said, "Think Bigger" learn, that's our job..I don't even worry about WHO Q is anymore, if Q turns out to be something sinister, I hope the knowledge gained is that WE are a force to be reckoned with that has a lot of HEART...that's our Ace in the hole.

18 minutes, Byron York says the IG Report may not come out until April or May now?!

originally posted by: ketsuko
18 minutes, Byron York says the IG Report may not come out until April or May now?!

That sucks.

a reply to: ketsuko

Hopefully that's because the evidence is building as more folk are flipped, more info comes in, and more obstructionists are removed from their current positions. In that case it would make sense on the delay. A careful reading of the few journalists covering this suggests that might be what's happening.

On the other hand, we've been fed crap sandwiches topped with rancid slices of coverup sauce for decades and the deep state won't change the menu unless forced to do so and will slash & burn as a last resort. We have to find ways--and be willing to--to send the message that the same ol' same ol' is unacceptable.

There's so much at stake here as we all know. This opportunity seems to be our last/only chance to right the sinking ship to some degree.

Thanks for posting the vid, Ket, I'm about to dig in.

originally posted by: gps777

Its an hour long so maybe mark it to watch when you have the time Sky.

Bookmarked for later watch, thanks. It has become clear to me that Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch were actually trying to tell us something much deeper than run-of-the-mill film reviewers would have us think.

a reply to: IAMTAT

It’s an important report. The more thorough the better.

May would be fine.

Things will get ugly(er) in June either way.

a reply to: Skyfloating

Eyes wide open?

a reply to: dashen

So the majority opinion seems to be to double down on the crazy. Fair enough. But we darn well better use verifiable sources

"I'm sorry Dave dashen, I'm afraid I can't do that."




files.abovetopsecret.com...

My goal is to impress AnkhMorpork before I die.

a reply to: carewemust

I assumed the portrait meant that Obama was tied (by) ivy to Bush - effectively owned by him.

a reply to: beachpeach

Hi Beachpeach,

Here is the archive link to Pt 2 Pages 1 to 100 Youtube videos S

I can't edit the original archive post to amend but will correct it in a repost at start of Thread 4 after the index posts.