-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

Is this q anon person(s) affiliated with this site?
americanbridgepac.org... which is actually americanbridge.org but it redirects adding pac into the URL

It appears whoever runs that one ( in Seattle) also runs qanonposts.com


Anyways there’s the Bridge clue


Like I said I know nothing about this stuff. Not following it. Just thought this was curious.

It’s probably a Russian anyways , just a guess.

a reply to: violet I highly doubt Q is involved with that publication it is a pure hit piece on everything republican also Q and Qanon are not the same person/persons Qanon may well have links to that site but as I stated they are not Q

I found what I believe is the saddest and most pathetic twitter account on twitter

twitter.com...

my reply to one of the very few tweets made

twitter.com...

I'm pretty sure it's him, just never took to twitter after getting on originally.

Why is Wiki private?

First I had researched possibilities of free/not so much for profit Wiki hosting sites. From terms and conditions it is clear we can not use such services for our purpose. If not for other reasons, there is big trouble with copyrighted material. Also I like to have everything under control so special VM for Q Wiki (or other projects) was way to go. I could do our wiki public for reading but I'm afraid few days into production our company would be bombarded by legal threats from all over the world.

Everybody is invited to use Wiki as personal notebook. It is good way how to become familiar with formatting + you are seeding future articles/pages.

For example I was digging Sentient World Simulation. I grabbed every substantial article in full, created appropriate pages and list of articles organized by date under SEAS page. What happened? I archived my research + something like timeline is emerging.

P.S.
PM me for URL/login/password. Please change your password immediately after first login.

P.P.S.
There is trust issue. Please do not dox yourself or others. Use VPN and possibly sandboxed web browser for digging and posting anywhere.
Wiki server is located in Czech Rep. - it is better than continental USA but I want to keep backup there in case of intercontinental links blackout. Linux admin able to revive wiki server from DB/config backup is really welcome.

P.P.P.S. Next Wiki article will be about OPSEC ...

Happy digging

Confused by the more outlandish esoteric interpretations that occasionally come up re the whole Q phenomenon? Here are two older ATS threads that will help you better understand the ideas some of these views are based upon.


Window of Opportunity is a thread that was started in Oct 2008. It currently has 290 flags. This thread (TH3WH17ERABB17) currently has 185 flags. That should give you an idea of how much interest it generated!

If the ideas presented there resonate at least partly with you give also a look to Hidden Hand Message - Law Of One - Discussion!.

Wether this resonates with you or has you shaking your head in disbelief please don't start Q-unrelated discussions about it here in this thread. If you feel a need to discuss this in more depth try either reviving the threads I mentioned or make a new one. I merely wanted to point you to the lense some of us are viewing all of this through.

a reply to: tigertatzen

If the Deep State within the US were one side of a mirror, then the Deep State within Israel would be the other side. Look at how much screeching there has been over his decision about Jerusalem

Thank you for your reply and i will ask again. Why does QAnon not talk about Israel. This is the elephant in the room and it really is a big one.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Perhaps they don't simply shut Q down because too many people are now paying attention. They've already overplayed their hand because their panic caused them to become sloppy...and now people are seeing through the illusion, while many more are becoming aware that there is an illusion and will soon see past it too.

People would not have been paying attention if they had closed it down early enough. Very easy to do. Knock a chan offline. Peeps use to do it all the time.

I watched the level of censorship with PG. They had no issue knocking off mega threads from reddit. Plenty of people saw that and saw through the illusion. That did not stop them.

There is no reason why the same thing cannot be done again. QAnon is being allowed to happen where as PG was not and WL.

People are doing an excellent job at deciphering Q posts. But doing little to nothing trying to work out the motives or work out who is behind Q. Looking at Qs not ability to talk about the Zionist regime for over four months now. Really should make peeps ponder somewhat.

Q talks about 911 justice. Not a mention of the Mosad agents that where arrested. Do you not think this odd.

a reply to: tigertatzen

They want to stop Q more than anything. But they can't, because Q is a collective of people. So they take out our key player at every turn so that we will run around in circles, waiting for the next set of clues. And if they can impersonate Q and feed us false leads, all the better.

Yes Q can be stopped. Not hard to DDos a chan.. Q is not everyone. Q is a small group of people. They stoped PG dead in it tracks. They can stop Q too. We really should be asking why Q has not been stopped.

Peeps on here are doing a great job at working on the bread crumbs. But if people are not asking what Qs motives are. Who Q is, What does not add up and what then the whole thread is only looking at half a coin. Its the glaring elephant in the room peeps.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Well...THIS is something new here on this thread...Valued posters bickering with each other.

No judgement...but I miss the unique unity and teamwork element by which many have defined this thread over past months.

It's more fun when we all work together.

Its all good looking at the bread crumbs being offered. But if peeps cant look at why the bread crumbs are being offered after three threads then we have a problem and evidently that is the case. I asked the question and look at the result. It rocked the boat.

There are things that do not add up and it is correct to look at them. This does not mean Q is right or wrong just but peeps need to look at. Otherwise its wild goose chase.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
I'm sorry to bother you, but Thread 2 Pages 1 to 100 Youtubes S opens up the zip file for Q to R. Also, do you have all of the files for Part 1? Thank you so much for all of this information. I've been reading over at the chans since the beginning of November, not knowing that ATS sleuths were discussing the Q information. It's good to be back with good folks.

originally posted by: purplemer
Peeps on here are doing a great job at working on the bread crumbs. But if people are not asking what Qs motives are. Who Q is, What does not add up and what then the whole thread is only looking at half a coin. Its the glaring elephant in the room peeps.

People are absolutely asking themselves these things, not only here, but on other forums and social media platforms too. People have asked themselves and tried to figure out who Q is and what the motives behind the Q messages are since the beginning. Some believe Q is DJT himself, some believe it is a rouge deep state group, some think it it Julian Assange, etc. I am surprised you are not aware of this.

If there is a "glaring elephant" in the troom, like your VERY concerned post(s) says, this is not it.

originally posted by: purplemer
Peeps on here are doing a great job at working on the bread crumbs. But if people are not asking what Qs motives are. Who Q is, What does not add up and what then the whole thread is only looking at half a coin. Its the glaring elephant in the room peeps.

Problem is we will mess 5 pages of this thread discussing Q background and finally we will be shut down because this is not mudpit. Keep it as Q news wire/fringe hypothesis thread.

P.S. It is perfect page for Wiki: Critical view on Q phenomenon!
There is probably hundred of posts discussing again and again your concerns in this thread. It is VALID point of view but it is not subject of this thread.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: tigertatzen

If the Deep State within the US were one side of a mirror, then the Deep State within Israel would be the other side. Look at how much screeching there has been over his decision about Jerusalem

Thank you for your reply and i will ask again. Why does QAnon not talk about Israel. This is the elephant in the room and it really is a big one.

I wish I knew the answer to that. All I can offer are possible ideas that have occurred to me. I can understand your frustration. A guess would be that their Swamp connection to our Swamp might be so entrenched that they are having to remove people by force. They likely have a stronghold there and some of our Swamp Things could possibly have fled there as well.

I feel the screeching and howling from the MSM was contrived and overdone, with regard to Jerusalem. I think is possible that announcement was a symbolic # you to the MSM because something else was happening that no one knew about. And they used it as a distraction because they were terrified that the other something might get leaked to the public. So they made an uproar about it. Incidentally, that is also right about the time they all started to lose their collective sh!t.

I think that Israel is probably one of their most fortified areas of operation. If the CIA is corrupt on our side of the mirror, then they've got an identical intelligence Deep State front on their side. It might be one of those things where they quietly let the remaining Swamp Things flee and follow them to some place over there where they think they'll be safe and hidden.

Another disturbing possibility is that They have some kind of weapon that might cause a lot of destruction that they're threatening to use if certain things are brought to light. They are supposed to have some of the most brilliant scientists on the planet over there. Who knows what they could be up to?

I do trust Q. The number one reason for that is because I originally started following MegaAnon, back in late August. And she didn't post like Q. She posted actual blurbs of information. And she was right, time after time. And I read all of her archived posts.

She is the one who ultimately led me to Q and this group. And things that are happening right this second are things that she said would happen, repeatedly. She refused to give dates or timeframes because she said the opposition was so powerful and entrenched that the plan was impeded and slowed by obstacles at every turn.

But she did say, repeatedly, to trust the plan. To be patient and educate ourselves on all of the various connections while the White Hats' plan played out. She didn't trust Q because there were various different people claiming to be Q, and some of them were actually working in DC. She outed them.

If you haven't read her posts, you definitely should. She gives a lot more detail that helps to flesh out the gaps in what we're getting from Q. Including things about Israel.

I give you props for questioning things. I personally believe that blindly following anything is patently unwise. I myself did not trust Q and it took another source with verifiable corroborating evidence to convince me.

Something else that convinced me, too, was joining this group and seeing all of the very respected and brilliant minds that were collaborating here. I have been here for six years now, and when I see people I know and respect focusing this intently on something, it warrants a closer look.

The most amazing thing of all of this...even if Q turns out to be bogus...we have uncovered very real, very serious crimes here. And even though in other discussions we've disagreed bitterly with one another, we've been able to put our differences aside and work respectfully toward a common goal. I would like to see that continue, with you as a part if it.

We don't have all the answers. That is why we are here. And there are people here who have joined the effort who really do have to watch their backs in real life because they really are close enough to the situation to become a target. So there may be information that they simply cannot share.

For example, I worked in the medical field and was bound by very strict federal laws as to how much patient information I was allowed to share...even with my own colleagues. Ditto hospital policies or other prohibited information. And when I said I could talk about one thing, but not something directly related, it often made me sound like an ass who was just making things up to sound knowledgeable. But the reality is, I could have lost my job and my license by even mentioning certain things.

With regard to Israel, even though I trust Q and am not by any means lumping him in with the media, when someone seems to avoid talking too much about something these days, it's typically because there is something there.

With the untoward amount of media and celebrity hype about Jerusalem, they would be able to deflect from any possible focus on sketchy or odd things going on in the vicinity. They probably expected Q to talk about it. So they went full retard on the Jerusalem issue so everyone would be paying attention to that.

Maybe from that perspective, you can be the one to figure out what's going on in Israel. Because something definitely is, and clearly, it's a subject that has not been thoroughly explored. It would be awesome to have you on the team, should you decide to stay.

We're all just looking for answers here. I don't know if I've been of any help to you with all of this, but I'll try as hard as I can to offer ideas and point you to things that may help you find answers. You quite possibly may discover things we've missed. That seems to be the case with a lot of things here, so fresh minds are very appreciated.

a reply to: dashen
Just wanted to pop in real quick and say a great big Thank You to you, dashen, for starting this thread with so much "catch up" information. Also to all of you who are contributing here. I feel like I've found some sanity where people who actually care are discussing the Q clues. I mostly lurk, and will go back to doing so. After I get some shut-eye, I'll come back and start where I left off reading at Page 4 of this thread. Y'all are a great bunch, and fun to follow where you lead. Keep up the awesome research. Where We Go One, We Go All!

Heart attack!

Sridevi Kapoor, Bollywood superstar, dies aged 54

Sridevi had no history of heart disease: Sanjay Kapoor

Post-mortem examination under way for Indian actress Sridevi who died in Dubai

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex


So what is the connection to Q and the breadcrumbs? Context?

originally posted by: MostlyReading
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex


So what is the connection to Q and the breadcrumbs? Context?

Heart attack was mentioned in Q crumbs. It is rational to keep list of VIP heart attacks as we keep lists of VIP resignations/suicides ...

P.S. With enough data we can do statistical analyzes for example ...

a reply to: JanAmosComenius

I know that.

I just don't understand how this particular Bollywood star may be connected to anything or anyone mentioned in the Q breadcrumbs, that is why I asked for some context. Without any kind of context or lines drawn to the Q breadcrumbs, it seems like rather random info. Pesonally I have never even heard of this actress but pershaps someone with more knowledge about her can provide some insight into possible motives for having her "heart attacked"...

originally posted by: MostlyReading
a reply to: JanAmosComenius

I know that.

I just don't understand how this particular Bollywood star may be connected to anything or anyone mentioned in the Q breadcrumbs, that is why I asked for some context. Without any kind of context or lines drawn to the Q breadcrumbs, it seems like rather random info. Pesonally I have never even heard of this actress but pershaps someone with more knowledge about her can provide some insight into possible motives for having her "heart attacked"...

Agree .. it is problem of linear threads. Potentially valuable data were presented, but they will sink in memory hole ... without context, it is nothing.