Pedophile identifies as 9 year old

A person can lose an arm or a leg and they are still the same person.
If a person loses their mind they very well become someone else entirely.
A person's characters, their desires and interests, emotionality and dispositions and more constitutes
who a person is. An individual is really the only one who can truly know themselves.

You could take a woman who is by society's definition a perfect woman. She has all the personality
traits, interests, poise and demeanor that our society considers ideal for a woman. They are a celebrated
person for just being who they are in their body.

Pluck that person's self into a male body and suddenly they aren't a real man. They do not possess and demonstrate
the character traits and self-expression that society considers would make them a "real man". They spend their life
being bullied and being treated as failures simply because their personalty that while considered ideal within a woman's
body is completely unacceptable in a male body. The worst offenders in this particular example are usually other men
who will consider that person a sissy, lacking the aggressiveness, bravado and initiative that is associated with masculinity.

The person now has a choice of attempting to pretend being a person they are not to try to limit the way they are treated
by society or they can assume that there has been a sort of birth defect that they can attempt to remedy by current medical science's only means of birth control and surgical procedures in attempts to fool society at large into accepting
WHO THEY ARE as acceptable because of their physicality.

People who say "if you can be a different sex then you were born then why not a dragon or a helicopter" or missing the boat entirely on the predicament of a transgender person. They are also failing to grasp what this whole "gender dysphoria" or "gender fluidity" etc is all about.

Society takes the whole gamut of possible expression of the human experience and personality and says okay, people born with a penis should have this personality and interests and people with vaginas have this other set. In actuality it's possible for a person to have any combination of those traits and interests. But, as I already outlined, if a particular individuals traits and personality do not align with society's expectations and mandates based on physicality then they are in for a very rough ride.

While the majority of people are satisfied and comfortable in how their personalities and bodies align there are some that do not and for them it's a rough time. Especially when a boy who is frail and likes fashion, makeup, is nurturing and emotional is treated as a failure as a "man" and conflated with the gay community or as is often the case such as here with deviancy and criminality.

Suddenly we have all this business about liberals plotting to undermine the nuclear family and normalize pedophilia and everything else. This stuff really has nothing to do with transgendered people even if some transgendered people are criminal pieces of crap just like there are rotten people within any group of people.

I personally believe that if people did not create such a ridiculous fuss about for example men wearing clothes that other people consider "women's clothes", didn't act afraid and angry and violent towards boys who were what they consider "effeminate", etc you would have a lot less people feeling they had to try to convert to "the opposite sex".

Nobody's body defines WHO THEY ARE so when society puts limits on who you are allowed to be based on your body you are going to end up with a situation like we have today. While I have been using male examples in this post it is all the same for a female.

When the left talks about gender being a social construct people say that's crazy and a denial of science because obviously boys have penises and women don't. The point is not that biological gender is in dispute but really that society's expectation of who a person can be and how they can express themselves is subject to superficial arbitrary rules.

A guy shouldn't have to even feel like he has to become a girl to be able to express himself as he wants. A man shouldn't have to be strong and a woman shouldn't have to be nurturing and emotional. It should be perfectly fine for a man to be as vain and fashionable as any woman and vice versa. None of this stuff really matters in the long run. Clothes? They are just fabrics. Makeup? Who cares? None of this is important.

It does seem that the left, seemingly an arm of the globalist cabal, is seeking to transform the world in a negative way, and it may very well be possible that nuclear family is under attack, and it does seem that the left has recruited every possible minority to use as political fodder. This has done no service to gay people, no service to the phenomenally misunderstood transgender community, or to anyone else that happens to be different from the bulk of the human herd.

I would hope this might give some understanding as to why something like "transage" or "I'm a helictoper" is totally unrelated and makes zero sense, just like the majority's understanding of what transgender is also very inaccurate.
Even the transgender community I find myself at odds with sometimes because our souls, or let's say minds if you don't believe in a soul, have no "gender". What makes a female personality feminine and what makes a male personality masculine? Who decided what character traits belong to what sex? Why is a soft sensitive man or a surly strong female abhorrent? Why are the shape of fabrics people like to wear so important that people want to assault or kill people over it?

People rightly condemn muslims for their oppression of women, how they can't wear what they want and have to cover up, then I regularly see the same people say they want to assault male bicycle riders for wearing spandex. WTF?

Are there people that "cross dress" because it linked to a sexual fetish? Yes. There is even history of gay men pretending to be women to entrap straight men into sex. I look around the world now and see how many humans seem to have some seriously bizarre perversions around sexuality, and an overall obsession with sexuality in the culture. None of that has anything to do with the problem of "transgender" though, and the problem in gender of society's mandate of behavior based on physical form.

I mean really in no other instance would society say you have to be a certain type of person just beacause of how your body is shaped. But when it comes to clothes and interests and things like that suddenly your body shape dictates who you are allowed to be.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Well you didn't finish reading my post, where I said I don't support any of that, but live and let live as long as that kind of thing isn't forced on me to have to accept it.

My point there was that there is a very big push these days to accept that kind of thing as physiological/biological. On the basis that, for instance, homosexuality was considered a mental illness and is now not...

but all that being said, I might have lost my mind long, long ago

a reply to: Somethingsamiss

The funny thing is, you're ignorant (literally) if you don't think they've been pining for the p. They've had multiple signs at their rally's everywhere about pedophilia being acceptable.

a reply to: 0001391

As fun as that was to read, it's wrong on every count. It all started with a false premise, that you could take a person who was already formed and had behaviors, then put them into another body. From there the logical leaps got even more wild.

I mean, last I checked, we are all born babies. We are all born with a penis or a vagina (and 1/100k are born with both, meaning there are only about 3k hermaphrodites in all of the USA, which can understandably have confusion). We aren't born adults, we all make choices that lead us into adulthood. We also all have flaws (some have addiction issues, others have sexual issues, others have commitment issues, etc). With all of these issues, which are genetic or learned, we (as a society) have decided that the best method is to try to overcome them, except sexual issues for some reason. No one is going to be accepting of your alcoholism or drug addiction. No one is going to be acceptable of your inability to hold down a job or relationship. Yet you expect people to accept your sexual deviancy, and not just turn a blind eye, revel in them and glorify them.

a reply to: face23785

OP. youre missing a point here. He may identify as a little girl,but unless he can back it up mentally with testing to determine if he is operating on a 9 year old level then its just the mans lawyer telling him to act stupid. Thats not being bigoted its standard procedure in mental cases.

Also By our laws you are(currently) what is on your birth certificate until you can show the outward look of the sex you are claiming to be. and only then after many years of mental testing.

no this is your confirmation bias talking.

Too many of us are overthinking this issue.
The dude is seriously screwed up in the head.
Can we not just put him in a catapult and toss him over a cliff?
There are better subjects to use brain capacity pondering.

a reply to: Dfairlite

What is real and that you are not understanding or simply for some reason don't believe is possible is that a personal can be born and develop naturally into a person whose personality does not conform to what society has arbitrarily mandated it to be based on their genitalia. Personality traits are deemed masculine or feminine and there are plenty of boys who are effeminate and plenty of girls who exhibit masculinity. This is frowned upon generally but it's who these people are. An effeminate boy is bullied by the masculine boys at school, but if he had been born with a vagina those traits would be perfectly accepted. You may think the body a person is born into controls who they become but you're demonstrably wrong in that because plenty of people exist who don't fit the mold. My post is not illogical and wrong. My post failed at communicating a truth that you either don't want to understand or are unwilling to accept. You have demonstrated one of the hazards of these people you don't understand - people like you condemn them by categorizing them in the same group as people who choose to make made life decisions (addiction), or with people who indulge in and practice sexual deviancy or fetishism. A transgender person may have sexual fetishes just as anyone a transgender person is not by definition of any particular sexual persuasion or deranged sexually at all. Correct me if I'm mistaken but it seems like you are saying that a male who has what society considers to be an effeminate personality has a "wrong" personality and they either need to learn how to be masculine or be dealt with as a mental patient. Even the LGB community often equates an effeminate male with homosexuality. It seems people just can't stop obsessing about sex. There seems to be an assumption that if someone expresses themselves outwards in a way that is different from "the norm", i.e. a masculine female or effeminate male, they must invariable have some latent sexual deviancy bouncing around in there too. Pulling up an example of someone that claims to be transgender for instance that sexually assaulted someone and using that as an excuse to show the downfall of society in its acceptance of transgenders is asinine because you can find sex offenders who call themselves Christians, offenders who call themselves Mormons, offenders who call themselves respectable businessmen, politicians, hippies, liberals, conservatives, etc as well. Transgender has nothing to do with sexuality, fetish, sexual proclivity and deviancy.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Yeah they were plants look into it further both sides of the political spectrum attempt to say the other side supports pedos.
No one does but the pedos all sides fight them.

a reply to: testingtesting

Show me the pedo signs at the tea party rallies. Thanks.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Oh please stop attempting to say the left want pedophilia legal. Not one on ats would say so. Stop turning this into a political point.
No one is supporting pedos if you checked the signs at the rally were plants by people like youself who use pedos as a political tool.
So just stop.

a reply to: 0001391

I know you think you're making some profound point but it really boils down to "societies tend to marginalize people who don't fit societal norms." Welcome to living in a society. It's been this way for millenia, it's not about to change. See straight white males for who your side demonizes.

You may think the body a person is born into controls who they become but you're demonstrably wrong in that because plenty of people exist who don't fit the mold. My post is not illogical and wrong. My post failed at communicating a truth that you either don't want to understand or are unwilling to accept.

Or your post failed on the logical level of accepting the realities of living in large groups.

You have demonstrated one of the hazards of these people you don't understand - people like you condemn them by categorizing them in the same group as people who choose to make made life decisions (addiction), or with people who indulge in and practice sexual deviancy or fetishism.

Addiction isn't a decision, it's a genetic predisposition. You think they chose to be addicted?

A transgender person may have sexual fetishes just as anyone a transgender person is not by definition of any particular sexual persuasion or deranged sexually at all.

Yes, they are. Wanting to remove part of your body is deranged. If you wanted to remove your eye, would you argue so vehemently that it's not deranged?

Correct me if I'm mistaken but it seems like you are saying that a male who has what society considers to be an effeminate personality has a "wrong" personality and they either need to learn how to be masculine or be dealt with as a mental patient.

You're wrong. I'm saying that every society is going to have norms. If you fall outside those norms, you're going to be ridiculed, made fun of, bullied, etc. That doesn't mean you're a terrible person or that you deserved it, just that it's the logical conclusion to the set of circumstances. They also make fun of and bully of kids who wore glasses when I went to school. Was it wrong of that person to have glasses? No. But bullied they sure were. Even as adults people discriminate against others with glasses, look up the studies.

There seems to be an assumption that if someone expresses themselves outwards in a way that is different from "the norm", i.e. a masculine female or effeminate male, they must invariable have some latent sexual deviancy bouncing around in there too.

You can thank hollywood and the gay community for that. Every gay person that I know, acts the part. IDK why they do it, it's really weird, but they do. People I knew growing up who didn't act effeminate at all, came out as gay then began acting effeminate. It's a really weird phenomenon. But I don't care. Act how you want to act. On a personal level, I get along with all of them. When it comes to what the state should enforce, we disagree. Yet somehow we coexist. Oops, now I'm rambling.

ETA: You should use paragraphs. Your walls of text are almost unreadable.

a reply to: testingtesting

So no links? What a surprise.

One group is normalizing apotemnophilia, gender identities, and race identities but you expect me to believe that they're not ok with age identities and that any evidence that they are, is just planted? Puhhhleeeease.

Now, I will concede that the majority of both sides don't support pedophilia (is it pedophilia if you identify as a nine year old?). However, that doesn't mean that there isn't a large component on one side that would be pleased as punch if they could pull off such a ruse.

a reply to: Dfairlite

On my phone I will post em later.
So a large component are pushing for pedophilia I call BS.
The only ones pushing for it are pedos who can be both right or left wing.
Disgusting attempting to say the left want it when no one here has said so.
But do continue attempting to politicise this it just makes you look silly.

a reply to: testingtesting

Sure, there are pedo's all over. But I know where I'd go if I were a pedo, and that's the land of proud sexual deviants.

I'd say this chap should be free to identify as anything he wants, as should anyone.

I just wish some of these people wouldn't demand that everyone else in the world be forced to also go along with their 'self-identity' LARPing.

He can identify himself with who or what he wants, but the real world, and the law, identifies him as what he is: an adult male predator paedophile.

Jail is the best place for him. I'm sure some inmates will indulge him his identity and pretend to be his 'uncles', and give him lots of sweeties to keep quiet. He'll love it.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Where's that?.

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: testingtesting

Sure, there are pedo's all over. But I know where I'd go if I were a pedo, and that's the land of proud sexual deviants.

Personally, I'd go to the land of incest and religious sexual abuse.

Just for a sec, I'm gonna narrow this topic down to specifics of the op because I didn't see this on any of the other posts. The accusations came about from women and children who lived with this guy, literally moved in with HIM. So I assume this guy had his own house with extra room, some type of income to support it, and enough of a predatory mentality to entice low income parents to move in under the guise of helping out. Now, was his remark about functioning at a 9 year old level, a flippant comment to authorities only, or ? Because I cannot see any legal defense with any of the known facts to back that up. Literally, a self sufficient 9 year old eh ?

originally posted by: GuidedKill
They have been dying to add the P to the LBGTQXYZ. Movement...

No. They absolutely have not.

It is proven that Alt-Right agitators have been trying to fake it up that somebody is trying to add a 'P' to it, so that they can discredit all LGBT people.

But it is absolutely proven that this is Alt-Right people trying to do it. To stir up the outrage we see in this thread.


You are all being manipulated, yes. But you're being manipulated by the Alt-Right.

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Somethingsamiss

The funny thing is, you're ignorant (literally) if you don't think they've been pining for the p. They've had multiple signs at their rally's everywhere about pedophilia being acceptable.

The people holding those signs were members of the Alt-Right who infiltrated the rallies under the pay of scum like Infowars and Brietbart.

To generate click-bait headlines for people like you to take at face value.

Wake up man. You're being lied to. Why on earth would gay people support pedophilia? It's insane.