-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: crankyoldman

saw nothing wrong with detaining Americans without recourse and supported the legal fight to keep that clause IN the NDAA where it still lies. 

Not to mention summary executions of American citizens by drone in Pakistan without due process, then calling it collateral damage.

Hmm Duckduckgo comes up with nothing when you search for 9/WW. Google however links to 9/11.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
9 lawyers worldwide? Edit: Wait a minute how many countries did Obama visit since Trump took office?

Based on a couple of Googled articles, I found the following:

United States (of course)
Canada
Indonesia
UK (inc. the British Virgin Islands)
Germany
Italy
France (inc. his South Pacifc vacation)
China
India

For a while, he seemed to be following Trump around whenever President Trump went abroad.

originally posted by: minniesoda
TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally retained counsel (9/WW).

GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

Q

You can count on him throwing a lot of people under the bus in an attempt to save his own hide.

You know something else that sticks out to me on that list?

There are a lot of Turks and the US Ambassador to Turkey on there. What was up with Turkey beginning in 2008? Do we see where Turkey is now?

Posted the pen pic again

▶Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/24/18 (Wed) 20:50:32 No.59
File (hide): 7660e1ec58878e9⋯.png (356.91 KB, 295x640, 59:128, RTM.png) (h) (u)


Can't upload images .

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: minniesoda
TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally retained counsel (9/WW).

GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

Q

You can count on him throwing a lot of people under the bus in an attempt to save his own hide.

It might be fun if the Obamas and the Clintons turn on each other, each attempt to avoid being the scapegoat.

a reply to: Skyfloating

I vividly remember Democrats and news anchors labeling Ronald Reagan an amiable dunce. And just look at the wonderful Legacy he made for himself and this country.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Thank you. 9 countries. Hmm.

It says the White House ?

Can't make the rest out .

Washington .

Democrats are crafting their own memo. This is so surreal.

Q MISSING POST 55,56,57
Missing 3 ?

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Democrats are crafting their own memo. This is so surreal.

It will be filled with fake news and lies. Dianne Feinstein will unilaterally release it.

Trump as just signed something big again.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Democrats are crafting their own memo. This is so surreal.

Fort Sumter crossed my mind when I read this.
They'd like nothing better than a civil war to pull their asses out of the fire now.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Democrats are crafting their own memo. This is so surreal.

It will be filled with fake news and lies. Dianne Feinstein will unilaterally release it.

#ReleaseTheMemo has some news articles that blame Nunes and the GOP for the MEMO and that they try to fool us. That makes no f#cking sense but whatever. These people are stupid.

Andrew McCarthy lays it all out. He explains why Clinton was never going to be indicted, namely that she was conversing with Obama and dragging her down would implicate him.

This piece also explains why Rybicki might have bailed so suddenly yesterday. He personally revised the draft that edited out the president's involvement for Comey.

On the same day, according to a Strzok–Page text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated by his chief of staff, Jim Rybicki. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.” This effort to obscure Obama’s involvement had an obvious flaw: It would practically have begged congressional investigators and enterprising journalists to press for the identification of the “senior government official” with whom Clinton had exchanged emails. That was not going to work. Consequently, by the time Comey delivered his remarks on July 5, the decision had been made to avoid even a veiled allusion to Obama. Instead, all the stress was placed on Clinton (who was not going to be charged anyway) for irresponsibly sending and receiving sensitive emails that were likely to have been penetrated by hostile intelligence services. Comey made no reference to Clinton’s correspondent:

McCarthy does a good job of laying out the timeline of how it all went down with links to the relevant sources right up to Obama saying he learned about it all on the news and him invoking executive privilege to keep the emails sealed.

Note that claims of executive privilege must yield to demands for disclosure of relevant evidence in criminal prosecutions. But of course, that’s not a problem if there will be no prosecution.

All along, there would be no prosecution because SHE WAS NEVER GOING TO LOSE.

Anyway, it gets a lot more involved than just this, so it's worth reading.

Also, how did Flynn get trapped by McCabe? The charge here is that Flynn got sandbagged. Interrogated without being told he was being interrogated so his lawyers were not present.

Well all the talk of these "Russian Bots" lead me to this, WTH ? I'm posting as I read this again, maybe someone quicker then me can explain or understand this better.

In 2014, the FBI issued what it called “an extraordinary warning” to several technology companies involved with Skolkovo. “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” warned Lucia Ziobro, the assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office. She added: “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by the government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”

victorygirlsblog.com...

Also note the logo for the "Clinton Global Initiative" does it have a total Pedo vibe? sorry never learned how to post pics on ATS, but you can see it in attached link.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Just from a short search on the net, Cheryl Mills was allowed to be in the room while HRC was interviewed. Now, Mills is a lawyer by trade, but her capacity when she worked for HRC was Chief of Staff. Remember that Mills was also given an immunity deal for her interview with the FBI. Now why would Cheryl Mills be allowed to be involved in an interview in the capacity of HRC's lawyer when she was being investigated from the same case? According to the notes of the interview, Mills was allowed in with several other lawyers, one name was redacted from the notes.

I just saw this on #greatawakening :

Julian Assange tweeted that Wikileaks has those 50,000 "missing" FBI messages, and will release them soon. According to him, it will prove DNC/FBI collusion beyond a doubt.