-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: CynConcepts

Obamacare should have taught them that.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Super Bowl! Say it with me ... SUPER BOWL!!

originally posted by: queenofswords
Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Adam Schiff.....bring it on.

Why would this memo make these congresspersons go apesh*t crazy? What are they hiding, too?

The DNC and Dem leaders, and Big Dem Donors are one big cesspool of dark corruption. Let's get this onion peeled!

Why? For the surface, if this gets proper legs, this is the Democrat Watergate, only worse because it's the sitting administration weaponizing government bureaucracy to do what some burglars did for the RNC back in those days.

The DNC has harped and harped and harped on Watergate ... so has the press for that matter ever since.

Now we have something similar but on a magnitude greater and there are no Bernstein and Woodward who have been highly touted throughout the main press ... in fact, the press, the so-called fourth estate, has been, if anything complicit in covering this over.

They stand to take the same kind of damage, DNC and press both, that the RNC has shouldered alone for decades.

But that's just a superficial reading.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: shooterbrody

The FISA Judge would, most likely, be one of these three:

Rosemary M. Collyer
James E. Boasburg
Rudolph Contreras

Thanks! Now we are getting back on track.

What will be the name of this "gate"? in 100 years this will be___________.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Some has been recusing from cases. Contreras sound right.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Hilarious the same people who call Trump Hitler are perfectly fine with the FBI and DoJ using nazi techniques to help another candidate to win the election.

Of course they are. It's perfectly fine to punch a Nazi too because words are violence.

a reply to: Skyfloating

The FISA Memo is a Deep State Bombshell

In terms of the memo itself, the arguments leveled against it in recent days have been exposed as hollow and disingenuous. No serious person who has ever worked in intelligence could make a case — now that the memo is public — that its release jeopardizes sources and methods, or places our national security at risk or any individual in danger.

The American people should question those — including elected Democrats and senior DOJ and FBI officials — who were making such a spurious public case about the need for secrecy.

A Special Prosecutor is the only way forward in the right direction.

Does Michael Wolff have ties to one or more of the FBI agents in question?

Wolff released his hit piece, and this Greenanon post asks who wears blue and green badges. On a whim, I looked it up. White House staff get color-coded badges.. But there's more ... look at the process and who does it.

White House employees are supposed to be among the most thoroughly screened in Washington.

The names of prospective staff members are first forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for what is known as a ''special inquiry.'' F.B.I. agents at offices throughout the United States are made available to conduct a background check.

''We do a very, very thorough investigation,'' said Milt Ahlerich, a spokesman.

Bureau agents are expected to talk with friends, relatives and neighbors of the prospective employee. Work histories are reviewed, and references are checked. Agents look for arrest records and follow up on unflattering rumors.

''We'll go as far as nececessary to resolve any derogatory information,'' Mr. Ahlerich said. The F.B.I. investigation is performed for all prospective employees, from maids to the most senior Presidential aides. It can take months, even for officials who have had background checks before.

A former Pentagon official recalled recently that he was subjected to an extensive background while working for the Defense Department. After he left to become a national security consultant for the White House, a new background investigation was requested, he said, and it lasted nearly nine months.

Plenty of excuses for the FBI players in question to access Wolff and plenty of excuse to assign his all-access badge.

I know he had lots of scathing things to write about Yates in there, but are there connections that can be run down in the background? Right now, all Google turns up is that "Fire and Fury" claptrap.

Europes most widely distributed Newspaper (German Language) is, not surprisingly, even more swampy than CNN. It reads

"Trump attacks the FBI!" (This particular newspaper has already established that Trump is an Insane Nazi)

a reply to: Skyfloating

Recall when they were mad because the US was outed as having spied on Merkel?

Thank, Obama!

Oh, wait ... that's right, the NSA has always been at war with the FBI? Did I get that right?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Skyfloating

Recall when they were mad because the US was outed as having spied on Merkel?

...which should have been one of the biggest scandals in U.S. History but was made out to be nothing more than an inconvenience.

Just like the Memo release is made to be a "Nothingburger".

a reply to: Skyfloating

BILD invented Fake News. Whatever they print just assume the opposite is true.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Speaking of BILD, their editor just quit.

WINNING!

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Europes most widely distributed Newspaper (German Language) is, not surprisingly, even more swampy than CNN. It reads

"Trump attacks the FBI!"

THANK YOU! you'll note back a few pages I stated that this "why does trump have a vendetta against the FBI" would be the preferred attack. Pundits would agree there are a few" bad apples," they "are gone," and the real problem is of course Trump and his hatred for the FBI. Too easy, in fact, lazy.

a reply to: ketsuko

Good news. what is it going to take to remake CNN?

a reply to: crankyoldman

Well, they're the elites. The smartest people in the room. No one can possibly be smarter than they are.

Nunez on foxnews at 6pm east

a reply to: carewemust

The Storm

When someone is put under FISA surveillance, how extensive is that?

Do they follow you? Record your phone conversations? Monitor your emails? Observe you as you go about your day? Watch your FB, Twitter, Instagram, etc.?

Do they watch your kids? Your wife/husband? Your parents? Listen to your political discussions with friends and associates? Do those friends and assoc. get caught up, too, if they happen to say something the FBI doesn't like (assuming you are a political hack agent like Strzok or someone.)

Just how far do they go in their spying?