It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lab4Us
originally posted by: Pyle
Why is everyone blaming DEMS when Ryan and McConnell didnt even put forward a bill that eve gets all GOP support let alone DEM support?
Because the Dems were handed no less than four things they specifically asked for and nothing they didn’t want...and then voted no for the items they specifically asked for...
There is zero reason not to work out DACA separately, especially since there are literally months before any deportations of Dreamers could happen.
The Dems just don’t want chain migration to end...and thus lose a huge part of their base...
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Lab4Us
originally posted by: Pyle
Why is everyone blaming DEMS when Ryan and McConnell didnt even put forward a bill that eve gets all GOP support let alone DEM support?
Because the Dems were handed no less than four things they specifically asked for and nothing they didn’t want...and then voted no for the items they specifically asked for...
There is zero reason not to work out DACA separately, especially since there are literally months before any deportations of Dreamers could happen.
The Dems just don’t want chain migration to end...and thus lose a huge part of their base...
So its the DEMS fault that the McConnell and Rayn are using these things as hostages to try to force through bad legislation?
Barbara Comstock
@RepComstock
In light of the unacceptable action taken by Senate Democrats to shut down the federal government, I have requested my pay be withheld until the #SchumerShutdown ends.
originally posted by: Violater1
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert
Isn't authoritarianism great?
No.
Why would the Democrats make this happen?
Is the OP a democrat? I was referring to what he wants to do.
The OP proposed it as possible because of the government shutdown.
I guess you didn't get that.
No. The OP did not say it was possible. They stated what the president could do and their approval for such actions.
The title of the thread is, literally, "Time to weaponize the Democratic Schumer Shutdown".
That doesn't sound like discussing possibilities to me.
Sigh
You are wrong again( don't you ever get tired of being wrong?).
Punctuation marks are not displayed in the title of the OP. So a question mark would not be displayed.
originally posted by: six67seven
“Honesty” and “dems” don’t belong in the same sentence unless your pointing out they have none.
Their honesty was lost long before Shumer said that in 2013.
Nonetheless it’s fun to reminisce and laugh.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Pyle
What bad legislation ?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NICE MOVE:
Barbara Comstock
@RepComstock
In light of the unacceptable action taken by Senate Democrats to shut down the federal government, I have requested my pay be withheld until the #SchumerShutdown ends.
twitter.com...
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sillyolme
Things have changed.
All the illegal crap will be outed and overturned soon.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NICE MOVE:
Barbara Comstock
@RepComstock
In light of the unacceptable action taken by Senate Democrats to shut down the federal government, I have requested my pay be withheld until the #SchumerShutdown ends.
twitter.com...
Wonder if he supports the DNC bill that does this exact thing for the whole senate or if he is just trying to pander.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NICE MOVE:
Barbara Comstock
@RepComstock
In light of the unacceptable action taken by Senate Democrats to shut down the federal government, I have requested my pay be withheld until the #SchumerShutdown ends.
twitter.com...
Wonder if he supports the DNC bill that does this exact thing for the whole senate or if he is just trying to pander.
You mean "she", I suspect.
I don't know what else she supports...but she deserves a bit o' credit for doing this...Wouldn't you agree?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vector99
If they don't include it now it will be dropped in the future. It's another accomplishment of Obama's that trump needs to undo to feel safe in his manhood. So they won't ever include it. It's now or never. What's the problem when they gave him money for the stupid wall?
Because he has no intentions of ever addressing it.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Liberal this, liberal that. Must be nice shoehorning millions of people into your version of a "basket of deplorables".
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Violater1
YEE HAW! Let the round up begin!
# ya!
Isn't authoritarianism great?
Let's round people up, give em numbers (perhaps barcodes...this is 2018 after all), put em on trains and ship em off to detention facilities until we figure out what to do with them.
What could go wrong?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: burntheships
Member this?
And Trump should own it.
originally posted by: Violater1
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert
Isn't authoritarianism great?
No.
Why would the Democrats make this happen?
Is the OP a democrat? I was referring to what he wants to do.
The OP proposed it as possible because of the government shutdown.
I guess you didn't get that.
No. The OP did not say it was possible. They stated what the president could do and their approval for such actions.
The title of the thread is, literally, "Time to weaponize the Democratic Schumer Shutdown".
That doesn't sound like discussing possibilities to me.
Sigh
You are wrong again( don't you ever get tired of being wrong?).
Punctuation marks are not displayed in the title of the OP. So a question mark would not be displayed.