It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beetee
a reply to: 1ofthe9
Nice catch. I am getting a hollow feeling in the pit of my stomach.
What it most telling is that there is not as much as a comment from the DOD or the Navy.
Why are they not being challenged on this? If they are chasing birds they surely need to be asked why? And the pilots who observed "amazing" flight characteristics. What about them? Were they on drugs?
Aren't anybody going to ask the tough questions? Demand an explanation and FOIA the full datasets and all the imagery? In the Nimitz case either the highly advanced radar system of the Priceton was very much faulty AND the pilots hallucinating while flying multi-million dollar planes, or there was something unusual there.
I think it would be in the best interest of the American people to discover which of the two was really the case.
Where is the Washington Post with the tough questions? Or CNN? Surely they know how to file a FOIA...
BT
originally posted by: 1ofthe9
Supposedly this last video generated more internet traffic then the first one managed in three months. Domestic media is starting to pick up on it.
Gotta wonder what they have left to bring out for the crowds.
The footage has been made available by the To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, a private research group conducting study into unexplained phenomena like this. That organisation is run by Hal Puthoff, who previously worked as a NASA and US Department of Defense adviser and James Semivan, who was a CIA service member.....
Source : The Independent UK
www.thedailybeast.com...
Christopher Mellon, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations, blasted the U.S. government for the lack of research on these incidents. “If the origin of these aircraft is a mystery, so is the paralysis of the U.S. government in the face of such evidence," he wrote. Last December, The New York Times reported on two declassified videos of alleged UFO encounters. In a statement to ABC News, the DoD confirmed the existence of the now-defunct Advanced Aviation Threat Identification program, which investigated unidentified flying objects until 2012.
originally posted by: cosmania
a reply to: 1ofthe9
The Navy does NOT give Hornet pilot amphetamines.
So I've been keeping an eye on these recent UFO sightings being released and covered both by TTSA and by news outlets. We've had two major videos both taken by F18's that have been released. One taken supposedly on the east coast somewhere and one on the west near San Diego. So here's my beef with these two- so if you look to the right side of the sensor overlays you'll see a 4 digit code, in THIS VIDEO it is 1688 and supposedly shot in 2004 on a routine training mission. That is the laser PRF code set for laser guided munitions. The Go Fast video with the waves in the backdrop was east coast- that jets PRF code was also 1688 and shot in 2015. This DOES NOT HAPPEN. PRF codes are assigned to a specific aircraft for specific sorties and the odds of this PRF being recycled through service to a new aircraft when there are millions of combinations are just that- 1 in millions. The only time a matching PRF code is set by 2 aircraft simultaneously is when one is laser designating a munition that the first aircraft is firing/dropping (ie a predator is laser designating for an A10, F16, B1 etc). Why would 2 F18s have matching PRF codes on different coasts even if at different time frames? They wouldn't. Plain and simple. For years I used the same PRF code overseas without it ever changing once as did every major air asset I worked with. As a military aviator I find this fishy as # now- something doesn’t add up here. EDIT: CLARIFICATION. Nimitz video is PRF code 1631. It took place in 2004. Gimbal video is PRF code 1688. It took place in 2015 off the East Coast. Go Fast video is PRF code 1688. Articles sight it as taking place off the East Coast. Gimbal and Go Fast are both pieces of the same video it appears. No discrepancies in location or time as of now, however, this begs the question whether TTSA is cutting and feeding these videos to us to keep funds rolling in OR the gov is cutting/splicing and releasing them to TTSA intentionally this way.
originally posted by: Paddyofurniture
a reply to: 1ofthe9
I’m not sure if this would matter with a FOIA request but I believe the official program title is Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program , not Aviation.
A more likely possibility is that certain veils that separate the worlds are breaking down slowly so we are starting to see glimpses and shades of that world. And in some cases it’s a deliberate descent into our broken plane
In chemistry and atomic physics, an electron shell, or a principal energy level, may be thought of as an orbit followed by electrons around an atom's nucleus. The closest shell to the nucleus is called the "1 shell" (also called "K shell"), followed by the "2 shell" (or "L shell"), then the "3 shell" (or "M shell"), and so on farther and farther from the nucleus. The shells correspond with the principal quantum numbers (n = 1, 2, 3, 4 ...) or are labeled alphabetically with letters used in the X-ray notation (K, L, M, …).
Source: Wikipedia - Electron Shells
There are obviously arcane metaphysical laws we know little about that the phenomenon is operating within.
Bigelow has spent just under $290 million on his venture, and is the sole benefactor of Bigelow Aerospace, which does not yet make a profit. But he does expect a return on his money—and soon. “Everything depends on the taxi side of the business,” he says.
Link: fortune.com...
“For sixteen years, Bigelow Aerospace has functioned nearly exclusively as a research and development company,” he said. “Starting in 2016, our intent is to behave in more of a financially responsible manner seeking to generate revenues as well as maintaining financial practicality on operating expenses.”
Source: spacenews.com...
On Monday, Elizondo also noted "eerie similarities" between the new video and the ones released last year, including the location in US airspace, the presence of US Navy pilots, the "Tic Tac" shape of the object and other signatures he said the videos shared in common.
originally posted by: Whatsthisthen
a reply to: Willtell
A more likely possibility is that certain veils that separate the worlds are breaking down slowly so we are starting to see glimpses and shades of that world. And in some cases it’s a deliberate descent into our broken plane
Or perhaps the opposite may be so?
If we build heavier atomic elements, say polonium with an atomic weight of 84 and the heavier elements, then it follows that we are building a denser matter aspect into our world in this atomic age. We are creating something that was not there before.
(Before anyone hangs me with science, I'll suggest the possibility of previous atomic ages such as the vedic as possible precursors for the heavier elements.)
I'll use the electron shell concept of physics as a close analogy because I think it is the concept of the "shells" that are the key and not the "particles".
In chemistry and atomic physics, an electron shell, or a principal energy level, may be thought of as an orbit followed by electrons around an atom's nucleus. The closest shell to the nucleus is called the "1 shell" (also called "K shell"), followed by the "2 shell" (or "L shell"), then the "3 shell" (or "M shell"), and so on farther and farther from the nucleus. The shells correspond with the principal quantum numbers (n = 1, 2, 3, 4 ...) or are labeled alphabetically with letters used in the X-ray notation (K, L, M, …).
Source: Wikipedia - Electron Shells
IF this is so, then it may not be a case of "certain veils that separate the worlds are breaking down slowly".
It would be a case of bridges being built between worlds. And if you need heavier, denser building blocks to build the bridge, then it follows that the consciousnesses on the other side of the bridge would be heavier and denser too.
"a deliberate descent into our broken plane . . . "
Or might that be "accent" rather then "descent"?
There are obviously arcane metaphysical laws we know little about that the phenomenon is operating within.
Look between the thoughts ~ Look between the particles.