Justice Department reopens Hillary Clinton email investigation

a reply to: imthegoat

A what fund? Shush? Get real.

a reply to: Sillyolme

It's so commonly accepted that what she did with classified material is a crime that military personnel are now using her as a mitigating factor in their own sentencing for the same crimes.

At least, accepted by people who aren't HRC sycophants.

a reply to: introvert

Ya, like I said...no bite.

Understood, its hard for someone to swallow that bite while their head is buried in the sand.

a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

I thought there already was an investigation.. many many investigations?

A special counsel to conduct an investigation with "teeth" is required.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Wait...so you're trying to tell us it was something you can't even explain or back up yourself and you expect people to give that any credence???

a reply to: Sillyolme

Please do try and keep up

Shush fund

Investigation = Matter

Grossly Negligent (a phrase with legal ramifications) = Extremely careless

Remember when the US gov used euphemism to disguise their corruption, and the press just played along with it?

Let's hope those days are over.

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Sillyolme

Wait...so you're trying to tell us it was something you can't even explain or back up yourself and you expect people to give that any credence???

Sorry friendo, I'm gonna need evidence about the lack of evidence of evidence of credence.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

She was Clintons aide and had security clearance. I don't need to prove this everybody already knows it. Jesus...

She had clearance to read classified material.

She did not have clearance to do so via a private email account, on a personal laptop, that hadn't been approved for use by DoS.

I don't need to prove this, everybody already knows it. Jesus!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Shamrock6

I asked for evidence of a crime. Which has never been provided. I'm waiting...

Navy Sailor Jailed

A US Navy sailor was sentenced on Friday to a year in prison for taking photos of classified areas inside a nuclear attack submarine while it was in port in Connecticut.
Kristian Saucier, of Arlington, Vermont, appeared in federal court in Bridgeport, where a judge also ordered him to serve six months of home confinement with electronic monitoring during a three-year period of supervised release after the prison time. He pleaded guilty in May to unauthorized detention of defense information and had faced five to six years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines.
Saucier admitted to taking six photos of classified areas inside the USS Alexandria in 2009 when it was in Groton and he was a 22-year-old machinist mate on the submarine. The photos showed the nuclear reactor compartment, the auxiliary steam propulsion panel and the maneuvering compartment, prosecutors said.Saucier took the photos knowing they were classified, but did so only to be able to show his family and future children what he did while he was in the Navy, his lawyers said. He denied sharing the photos with any unauthorized recipient.

This is why she needs to be prosecuted. No More Double Standards!!!

a reply to: Shamrock6

My dog ate my evidence...

a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Nothing will come of it; HRC has the "photos" and knows who's been flying on the "Lolita Express".

But it is rather sad to see things devolve to the point that the Justice Department has essentially become a political football.

a reply to: RickyD

Bleachbit is a funny name for a doggo, but I like it

a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

A good start and since they found new emails recently a good sign for prosecution.

The problem with investigating Hillary Clinton, far too often others are getting a free pass for doing the exact same thing. And it ultimately shows how political and begins to look like a witch hunt, all to either discredit or ultimately slander the person to where they are no longer viable in the political area.

The other problems that have come up, is that if after the years of investigating the Clinton's there have been too many times and cases where the evidence was made up or tampered with to where one can not know what exactly the truth is or is not. And those who did the exact same thing are often never sought after or even subject to the same treatment.

So for there to be a new investigation, to get all to support there would have to be the following: 1) It can not be political. That means the congress and the President, has to stay out of it. 2) Has to be very specific as to what they are looking for and checking on. 3) Has to uphold the laws and rights all around. 4) Has to be equal. That means those who are in office now also have to be willing to be subject to the same treatment as the others.

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: Sillyolme

They are investigating EVERYONE involved. Crooked, Huma, Comey, the IT idiot. All of them.

Don't bother. Certain members show up in every HRC thread demanding evidence of everything over and over again yet always completely and utterly ignore it when the evidence is trotted out time and again.

Only to show up in the next thread, asking the exact same question, and ignoring the evidence all over again.

For some, HRC walks on water and has never uttered a lie in her life.

And for some others, it's just a day at the "office".

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: introvert

Ya, like I said...no bite.

Understood, its hard for someone to swallow that bite while their head is buried in the sand.

Again, no bite.

I'm willing to listen to what people may have, but I have to see anything of substance here.

If we are going to go down this road, let's quit playing games, rehashing old nonsense and bring some real meat that puts this bitch in prison for good.

I'm tired of reading all the BS you guys push out of wishful thinking.

a reply to: Kalixi

Just one part I find crazy is how bad at it they seem to be for people who are elegedly running a criminal empire..

And I think you can apply that to almost all conspiracies..

For example..

So hillary is running a pedo ring and decides to include politicians?!?! The least credible, least dependable and most self motivated people ever?!?!

She has bumped of literally dozens of people, but the hit men forget to take Seth (forgot his last name..)’s wallet?!?!

Wouldn’t the kind of professional working for a criminal empire backed by billions do an air tight job?!?!

a reply to: Shamrock6

Commonly accepted accept by the law enforcement agencies who investigated her.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

The usual response to that is "they're just rubbing our noses in the fact that they can get away with it."