The Storm is Here 4,289 SEALED Federal Indictments

a reply to: Zaphod58

Thank you very much for your reply.

1. Hal Turner is known for posting hoaxes. He says several times that he's basing some of this information on "speculation among former Intel contacts" and rumors.

You are correct. I did not know that. This is why I made a new thread about it. Removed the link a put in a link to the US gov website. This did not stop my new thread being binned.

2. He goes on to say that it APPEARS that the indictments are the result of a search warrant relating to child porn.

Yes I did This is my opinion. In keeping with the spirit of ats. When you post material you are meant to say what you think about it. I think this a good chunk of ats think the same. Should we not share our opinion.

3. Even if the number is right, which it seems to be, no one knows who the indictments are for, or what the charges are. Based on those, there is no way to say that this is going to "drain the swamp" or that a bunch of political figures are involved. The only thing that can be said for sure is that there are a large number of sealed indictments in the system.

No but again I post my opinion. Trump post that the swamp is being drained on his tweet the other day too. Can we no longer express our opinion if its a political view you dont like


You know I am not trying to cause an issue and I appreciate you posting your comments. I wast told my thread was hoaxed because of a bad link. I made a new thread because I did not want the thread hoaxed and it was binned. I was told this happened because I re threaded a hoaxed thread. Does not make sense.

It is dishearting. I am not trying to fall short of the terms and conductions. I want to know the rules so that I can work within them. I want people to be able to discuss and share opinions. Thats how we all learn. Is this being stiffled or am I missing something.

Would also like to stay on topic. What do you think of the sealed indictments.

originally posted by: Zaphod58

The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

a reply to: MostlyReading

That's between the OP and the staff. We don't discuss removals with other members. But, if a thread or post is removed, there is a T&C violation involved. They don't get removed for no reason.

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

Tell me the reason please if you could. My second thread as was made to counter the issues of the first thread. It is still gone.

If you cannot disucuss. Could you please PM.

Thank you

originally posted by: RomeByFire
It's threads like these that really highlight the absurdity of the pro-Trump crowd and their incessant use of "witch hunts."

Don't worry - I'm sure one day, one of these "bombshell," threads will turn out to be something.


Whether it be QAnon, another "bombshell," about Hillary, an anonymous source claiming resignations within 72 hours, I'm sure this swamp draining will happen someday!

I am not pro trump and i keep telling people that. I just want the truth.

originally posted by: and14263
Love it when a thread gets put in here and the usual suspects show up.

Ever tried Googling positive facts about Trump and wonder why CNN, BBC and Snopes occupy the first 10 pages?

Ever wonder why countless UFO videos never make the hoax forum?

Ever wonder why it is only the topics the rest of the MSM is censoring that end up in the hoax bin?

I use to wonder. I know longer do. Thank you for your reply. May I ask what you opinion is on the OP. Does the swamp theory to you hold any water.

a reply to: CynConcepts

I am getting disillusioned with folks here. As I posted in the other forum, I don't necessarily agree with your speculations, but feel if in order to deny ignorance one must leave their mind open to possibilities

I agree thats how we all learn.

Thank You

a reply to: Sillyolme


What do you think Sillyolme. Do you think the swamp is being drained. Or are all these indictments and trump saying he is about to drain the swamp all just coincidence..

a reply to: purplemer

You can’t just post any and everything you read that you agree with just because you agree with it. There some crazy stuff out there on the internet and I would advise using a little discrimination when selecting who to source.

This has to do with who you’re using for source information and if I were you, I’d quit visiting and sourcing information from sites that have proven to be unreliable.

It just that easy.

thank you for your reply. I can post to the Us Gov. That source is not considered good enough either. The indictments are real and I am allowed to share my opinion.

KNOCK IT OFF!!

No more personal attacks.

Go after the ball not the player.

Heed this warning.

a reply to: purplemer

Except for the really minor fact that I never once said anything about you. I said there were problems with the story. Unless you wrote it, that doesn't have anything to do with you and your opinions.

a reply to: purplemer

You do understand what a sealed indictment means, right? Just because there are that many doesn't mean that they're going after all political figures. No one but the court involved knows who they're for and the charges involved. Just because they're real doesn't mean it has anything to do with going after politicians. And saying that it is doesn't make it true.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: purplemer

Except for the really minor fact that I never once said anything about you. I said there were problems with the story. Unless you wrote it, that doesn't have anything to do with you and your opinions.

The story was factual. The indictments are real. Yes i think they are draining swamp I posted up they where arresting pedos and the swamp was being drained. That is my opinion.

Could you be so kind as to define then why the thread was taken down. It really does not make sense. I would rater post threads that remained within terms and conditions. So I dont need to waste your time or mine.

Back to' the problems with the story'
I remade the thread changed the link and the thread was still removed. I linked to the US gov. in my second thread. It was still removed. Do you have a problem with this site too. Clarification would make sense because as it stands at the moment it not there.

Or was my thread removed because of my opion undeneath. No disrespect to you. But there is a distinct lack of coherence with the rules. I want to know them so I can remain within remit..


:-)