True Pundit - Mueller Yanks Comey’s Immunity Deal; Falling Out Between Former FBI Bosses Puts Come

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Shamrock6
An unnamed source says Comey got immunity and now an unnamed source says it's been yanked. Or was it ever actually verified that immunity had been given?

True Pundit's unnamed reporter, reddit, and 4chan are the only places I see this story. Doesn't exactly scream "legit" to me but who knows.

Hence my caveat in my op - "If true".

ATS is littered with OPs citing True Pundits with the caveat "if it's true" and it never is true. Unless True Pundit is aggregating it from somewhere else (they're a mixture).

At some point I hope that folks will catch on that True Pundit is about as credible as Sorcha Faal.

Any media source that doesn't use links to back up its claims gets an immediate "propaganda" stamp in my book.

a reply to: GuidedKill

Yeah So what federal prosecutor has any say in congress?

There are three divisions of government. Executive...the president...Legislative...The house and Senate and judicial ...The courts.
They are separate for a reason.
Go away and learn something. [snipped]

a reply to: Xcathdra

I read an interview with Lindsay Graham that backs this up.
I'll find the link here shortly!

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

No it has not. Stop.

According to Lindsay he indicates Comey is being investigated;
Here we go!

LINDSEY GRAHAM: No. I think Comey needs to answer questions as his time as director. I think he made some decisions that they were really very, very wrong. I would just say this with the president. There's an ongoing criminal investigation; Comey may be part of it. You tweet and comment regarding ongoing criminal investigations at your own peril. I'd be careful if I were you, Mr. President. I'd watch this.

www.cbsnews.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Comey may be part of it.

Did you miss that part?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

No it has not. Stop.

Yes they have, up to and including Comeys testimony.

Since you are going to throw a fit -
Former FBI director spoke with new special counsel and is cleared to testify before Senate panel

The special counsel investigating possible links between Russia and the Trump presidential campaign has cleared former FBI Director James Comey to testify before a congressional committee about his contacts with President Trump, according to an associate close to Comey.

Comey met with Robert S. Mueller III, whom the Justice Department appointed on May 17 to investigate any Russian ties to the Trump campaign, and Mueller said he had no problems with Comey's testifying, the associate said.

click link for full article...

a reply to: Krazysh0t

So you never believe original stories?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Krazysh0t

So you never believe original stories?

I can make exceptions for original stories, but this isn't an original story. It is a speculation article. It is propaganda.

a reply to: Xcathdra

More evidence that Bob Mueller and president Trump are working together.

originally posted by: CynConcepts
I don't remember Comey getting any immunity deal for himself. I do remember Comey gave quite a number of immunity deals during his 2016 investigation of Clinton and associates. Is it is possible that this source was misinterpreted. That Mueller is actually nullifying Comey's previous immunity deals due to the fact that it appears the DOJ and FBI scuttled the actual investigation?

Edit add: is that even possible? I will admit that I am not fluent on law details.

You know, this is (I think) indeed a possibility. We know that 7 people were granted immunity in the Clinton email investigation and that at least two of them violated that immunity agreement.



Go to the 2:43 mark in the above video. This is where Comey gets nailed and has to backpedal saying he was "confused and misremembering." If Combetta's immunity is null and Void, then he can be prosecuted. Cheryl Mills is the person who instructed Combetta to bleachbit the server after it was determined that the VVIP (who I still think was Obama) name could not be stripped from the archives.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

You must be assuming I'm only talking about leaks and developments that lean a certain way. I'm talking about the whole thing, it's all political bread and circus and is designed to keep people going back and forth about it. Have you noticed how every time there's a "nail in the coffin" for one side the next day that "nail" is taken out and put in the other coffin with a brand new breaking development? A little convenient if you ask me.

How much mental energy are people putting into this investigation over other things that are vastly more beneficial?

Sara A. Carter‏Verified account @SaraCarterDC
27m27 minutes ago

MY LATEST: FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel's Office had interviewed Michael Flynn

This investigation by the SP office is having real credibility issues.


FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel’s Office had interviewed Michael Flynn

A supervisory special agent who is now under scrutiny after being removed from Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office for alleged bias against President Trump also oversaw the bureau’s interviews of embattled former National Security advisor Michael Flynn, this reporter has learned. Flynn recently pled guilty to one-count of lying to the FBI last week.

FBI agent Peter Strzok was one of two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn, which took place on Jan. 24, at the White House, said several sources. The other FBI special agent, who interviewed Flynn, is described by sources as a field supervisor in the “Russian Squad, at the FBI’s Washington Field Office,” according to a former intelligence official, with knowledge of the interview.

Strzok was removed from his role in the Special Counsel’s Office after it was discovered he had made disparaging comments about President Trump in text messages between him and his alleged lover FBI attorney Lisa Page, according to the New York Times and Washington Post, which first reported the stories. Strzok is also under investigation by the Department of Justice Inspector General for his role in Hillary Clinton’s email server and the ongoing investigation into Russia’s election meddling. On Saturday, the House Intelligence Committee’s Chairman Devin Nunes chided the Justice Department and the FBI for not disclosing why Strzok had been removed from the Special Counsel three months ago, according to a statement given by the Chairman.

The former U.S. intelligence official told this reporter, “with the recent revelation that Strzok was removed from the Special Counsel investigation for making anti-Trump text messages it seems likely that the accuracy and veracity of the 302 of Flynn’s interview as a whole should be reviewed and called into question.”

“The most logical thing to happen would be to call the other FBI Special Agent present during Flynn’s interview before the Grand Jury to recount his version,” the former intelligence official added.

The former official also said that “Strzok’s allegiance to (Deputy Director Andrew) McCabe was unwavering and very well known.”

click link for entire article...

originally posted by: BlackJackal
Currently only TruePundit.com is reporting this story. The site has a reputation for being loose with facts so I will wait until another site picks up the story before I believe it.

I was thinking the same thing. Its funny though, one news source, even a very questionable one. There are too many, ifs for me to believe this.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Sara Carter, that is a lot better credibility than True Pundit.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Were they using the FD-302 for that interview?

Mighty sketchy bunch in the FBI.

Hi op is funny how your thread started out that you where not too sure how much this story could be true because of the source, and now that the circle jerkers have entered your thread your singing a different song.

Why being that the repblicans run both house and senate, why is nothing being done to put all those evil liberals in jail.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Hey! It's another media source with no sources backing up its claims. ETA: Actually check that, it's not even a media source; it's worse. It's a random blog. Though at least this one backs up the original premise of that agent being dismissed from the case. You sure do love pushing speculation and propaganda as reality don't you?

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

circle jerkers

There we have it again.
Stay classy.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Hi op is funny how your thread started out that you where not too sure how much this story could be true because of the source, and now that the circle jerkers have entered your thread your singing a different song.

Why being that the repblicans run both house and senate, why is nothing being done to put all those evil liberals in jail.

Am I? Where?