Death of White Supremacy: 95 yrs ago TutanKhamun tomb was first opened by Archaeologists

a reply to: The angel of light

You might wannna watch this:

Rise of the Black Pharaohs

originally posted by: TerryDon79
I’m sure that Denzel Washington’s twin!

Just look at the similarities in skin colour.

/sarc

I get more Wesley Snipes, Tut looks super dark and probably never paid his income taxes.

What is with you opening every post with this "peace be with all those that belong to the light" garbage?

If there was a god, he would smite you down for trying to push exclucivity of peace toward those who have bought the whole man made church for a profit thing.

What does white supremecy have to do with anything egyptian?

Are you white?

thanks

I had a best friend in high school, Kenny, he was as black as the keyboard I'm typing on... at night you could only see him if his eyes were open. His features were that of a Caucasian with narrow nose and marginal lips, nearly the same as me, an American Indian/Romanian/English ..... so the facial features really are not an accurate deciding factor.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: TerryDon79
I’m sure that Denzel Washington’s twin!

Just look at the similarities in skin colour.

/sarc

I get more Wesley Snipes, Tut looks super dark and probably never paid his income taxes.

You’re joking, right?

Of course he paid his taxes! Not all of them though. The pyramids were a big tax right off.

a reply to: TerryDon79


The DNA evidence I presented shows that El Tuterino was most likely related to people of the Levant and Middle East.

Now, does that make him a cracker? Of course not, but either way, I want people to refer to me as the Angel of Whiteness moving forward.

a reply to: Plotus

Tut “looks like” a black man, DNA not of a black man, probably identified as a non gender specific Abrams tank.

I heard his wrestling name was King “the tank” Tut, so it must be true

shame, shame, Touche't

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Angel of Whiteness

Not the Angel of Hats?

I feel mildly disappointed.

www.history.com...
The first two paragraphs gave pause... were the other mummies thought to be Negroid ? or were they ever really examined in that way ?

King Tut was buried with his racing chariot among other artifacts.
Probably did enjoy life in the fast lane.

a reply to: Krakatoa

feeble attempt at race baiting using unrelated sources based upon mere "faith" on you being correct in your uneducated assumptions.

Exactly - race baiting.

I always wondered what Egyptians must think of African Americans appropriating their history and culture for themselves.

Must be pretty irritating to any who actually care.

another race baiting attempt, well played sharpton.

100 percent correct - the white washing or suppression of black history is taught in Pan african schools not really anywhere else it is ALL to do with white supremacy the best speaker i have come across is the english rapper Akala that he did at Oxford Uni it really is a must watch

The man is so well versed on Suppressed Black history

i don't know know how to embed but the link is here www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: Plotus
www.history.com...
The first two paragraphs gave pause... were the other mummies thought to be Negroid ? or were they ever really examined in that way ?

Tut and most of the other Royals were the "Mediterranian" type (Caucasioid "mutt" for lack of a better term. They looked like the Italians of today (or anyone else in the Middle East.)

Now... Egypt has a written history (written by Egyptians) that stretches back 5,000 years. During that time and for one brief period (25th Dynasty) there were Nubian kings. A number of kings came from the south at different times but there's no evidence that they appeared to be sub-Saharan African.

Forensic Evidence:
CT Scan of Tut - notice the squared shape of the eye sockets, the bone of the nose (how high it is and near to the eyes) and the fact that the chin moves inward to the teeth.

Male Caucasian skull - same features.

Sub-Saharan African male - broader nose, nasal opening lower on the face, chin does not move inward just below the lip.

For most of Egyptian history, Nubia was either independent or a very reluctant part of the Egyptian empire. The kings of the New Kingdom (including particularly Hatshepsut) paid a lot of attention to it, expanding the temple at Karnak and appointing Nubian nobles to positions of authority there in the Nubian area.

a reply to: Byrd

So your trying to tell me that in ancient north east Africa the ruling elite was more anglo saxon looking..... Ok mate sure it was

a reply to: theruthlessone

Unless I'm mistaken, he didn't say that, however the links to the skulls is illuminating, with the evidence leaning toward non-negroid. And the couple centuries of Nubian rule certainly doesn't default by attrition all later generational ethnicities.

originally posted by: theruthlessone
a reply to: Byrd

So your trying to tell me that in ancient north east Africa the ruling elite was more anglo saxon looking..... Ok mate sure it was

No. He specifically said Mediterranean.

Anglo-Saxons didn't even exist in Ancient Egyptian times.

Do you know how many ethnic groups there are in Africa? They number in the thousands. Each with their own customs and cultural traditions.

The animosty between many of these ethnic groups has been the driving factor between most African conflicts of the 20th & 21st centuries. The Congolese Civil War and the Rwandan Civil War being particularly notable examples.

Are you going to say the Coptic people of Egypt and Sudan looked indistinguishable from say, the Shona of Zimbabwe? That is a most racist viewpoint.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79


........ I want people to refer to me as the Angel of Whiteness moving forward.

Angel of Whiteness ? The "dashing through the snow" Whiteness guy ?

Like the one with Reindeers, elves, a sleigh and sheeet ?
Dashing through the snow
On a one-horse open sleigh,
Over the fields we go,
Laughing all the way;

Ho ! Ho ! Ho! ( or is it 'ho! 'ho! 'ho! I never can tell...)