Texas Church Shooting : Thread

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

According to CDC hundreds of thousands to a couple millions of people use those scary guns to defends themselves from harm and certain deaths every year.

a reply to: aceshootn

Yeah they don't work.

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: aceshootn

Do you know how stupid this argument is.

We ban drugs and people still use drugs so if we ban guns then people would still use guns.

So what we should not not ban drugs then either by that logic.

How about rape, we ban that but people still rape so lets legalise that....oh and robbing old ladies.

Could it e you are starting to get it?

See, people intent on breaking a law will do it regardless. Someone show has decided to kill another human will not be stopped by any laws in their way. Once that internal decision is made, laws make no difference.

Yes, even in your beloved UK, where the mayor of London expects everyone to accept that violent terrorist incidents are a normal way of life.

Yup, you live in Fantasia.

I think he finally got it. BUT will never understand it

a reply to: dragonlover12

Yes, Samir al-Hajeed = Sam Hyde

The trolling is endless.

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Does the look of that rifle frighten you?
Does the color of that rifle frighten you?

Explain why YOU think it should be illegal....please, I honestly want to know your though on that point.

If I saw that rifle pointing at me, I like, all of the rest of you, would probably need a new pair of underpants.

I think it should be illegal because its only purpose is to kill other humans.

Pretty simple.

We should ban knives too, right?

Indians and cavemen used to use spears.

Therefor we should ban trees as the branches can be made into weapons.

See how ridiculous all this gets when we blame the tool instead of the person?

As for this schmuck who shot up the church, no legislation could have prevented it. Could have easily just downloaded TOR, gone on the deep web and bought whatever assault rifle he wanted.

originally posted by: queenofswords
On this day, 8 years ago, the Fort Hood shooting happened when Nidal Hasan fatally shot 13 people and injured about 30 others.

And it is still happening.

You see all these members who are defending their rights to own a gun and who are shouting down those of us who point out that all these guns might not be a good idea.

They have blood on their hands.

You lot are the reason there is not the political will to change, you lot are the reason that its not harder for these kind of evil men to go out and by those tools of death. Because you have not acted, you defended their right to go out killing.

This is your fault almost as much as it is the shooters.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thank you!

This is so wrong I`m not even able to wrap my head around it

Welp since people have been using vehicles to kill people we should ban vehicles as well.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: queenofswords
On this day, 8 years ago, the Fort Hood shooting happened when Nidal Hasan fatally shot 13 people and injured about 30 others.

And it is still happening.

You see all these members who are defending their rights to own a gun and who are shouting down those of us who point out that all these guns might not be a good idea.

They have blood on their hands.

You lot are the reason there is not the political will to change, you lot are the reason that its not harder for these kind of evil men to go out and by those tools of death. Because you have not acted, you defended their right to go out killing.

This is your fault almost as much as it is the shooters.

And conversely, I hope you can sleep with the blood of all those killed with knives and vehicles in your UK Fantasia.

Their blood is on your hands as well then.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Welp since people have been using vehicles to kill people we should ban vehicles as well.

Immigrants have killed people.

Gotta get rid of immigrants as well.

Well then any citizen of any country whose government has not outlawed any implement that has been used in murder has blood on their hands also.

originally posted by: joemoe
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

According to CDC hundreds of thousands to a couple millions of people use those scary guns to defends themselves from harm and certain deaths every year.

Bollocks.

According to the Gun violence Archive about 1700 have been used in self defence, now whats almost funny is that there have almost been as many incidents of accidental shootings.

So every time someone uses a gun in self defence another accidentally shooting themselves or someone else.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: aceshootn

Do you know how stupid this argument is.

We ban drugs and people still use drugs so if we ban guns then people would still use guns.

So what we should not not ban drugs then either by that logic.

How about rape, we ban that but people still rape so lets legalise that....oh and robbing old ladies.

I find it odd nobody is found mentally incompetent to exercise the right to vote?

If it was a matter of public safety and health, then the leading killer of children under 12 would have been banned long ago. The privately owned automobile. We have public transportation. I’ll give up my guns when you make it illegal to own a automobile.

What is the new tactic used by terrorists?

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: queenofswords
On this day, 8 years ago, the Fort Hood shooting happened when Nidal Hasan fatally shot 13 people and injured about 30 others.

And it is still happening.

You see all these members who are defending their rights to own a gun and who are shouting down those of us who point out that all these guns might not be a good idea.

They have blood on their hands.

You lot are the reason there is not the political will to change, you lot are the reason that its not harder for these kind of evil men to go out and by those tools of death. Because you have not acted, you defended their right to go out killing.

This is your fault almost as much as it is the shooters.

And conversely, I hope you can sleep with the blood of all those killed with knives and vehicles in your UK Fantasia.

Their blood is on your hands as well then.

We have laws regarding knifes.

ie. you are not aloud to carry a knife in public, last I checked I think its a 5 year prison sentence.

a reply to: Subaeruginosa

Well, I can tell you if things would go down here where I'm living I would buy a gun as quickly as I could. I wouldn't want to be unprotected if some brainwashed lunatic was running into a church or some festival where they open fire on innocent people.

The main fact that they target holy places now should be looked upon, where's the decency of leaving holy places of pray and peace alone and one almost has to carry a gun in a church is the saddest thing ever? Do we need bodyguards at holy places now?

One thing I know or think I know is if it's a criminal act, then also criminals have the decency to stay out of holy places to finish what they have to finish.

Some people seem to slowly lose it, and one can ask himself why now, are there still forces at work that want the government to fail and fall? It almost seemed organized and what happened in Vegas should be a good example of that.

It has nothing to do with guns, it has all more likely to do with the sanity of some typical persons who seem to be easily persuaded to go on doing some grotesque acts on simply innocent civilians.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: aceshootn

Do you know how stupid this argument is.

We ban drugs and people still use drugs so if we ban guns then people would still use guns.

So what we should not not ban drugs then either by that logic.

How about rape, we ban that but people still rape so lets legalise that....oh and robbing old ladies.

Do you have any idea how stupid the "ban guns" argument is? You've already ignored the flaws in your logic.

So explain to all us, Mr Brit, how you suggest going into every inner city across America and taking the millions of illegal guns away from all the gangs? Your whole idiotic argument is to take a hunting rifle away John Smith who enjoys going deer hunting once a year. Now enlighten us on how you'll walk into a Blood or Crip or Black Nation or Vice Lord neighborhood and take all their guns away.

But you can't. Why? Because you project from ignorance from a little island off the coast of continental Europe and have no real idea about the issues here. So you argue emotion.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Welp since people have been using vehicles to kill people we should ban vehicles as well.

Immigrants have killed people.

Gotta get rid of immigrants as well.

White supremacists and Klansmen have killed people.

Gotta get rid of them as well.

originally posted by: Skorpy
Devin Kelly might be the shooter, still checking for confirmation.

www.facebook.com...

This was just confirmed. I've been following along via social media/reddit/ TV and had not seen this name mentioned once except in this thread. Where did you get this tip from?

Shooter is ID'd

BNO News

As an earlier person linked the FB profile, and was correct.

Devin Kelly is our shooter.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Welp since people have been using vehicles to kill people we should ban vehicles as well.

Immigrants have killed people.

Gotta get rid of immigrants as well.

White supremacists and Klansmen have killed people.

Gotta get rid of them as well.

People have slipped in bathtubs.

Lose those as well.