It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?
originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
On Mars?
the rocks in mars have also been following the rover around for years as well
originally posted by: CraftBuilder
This and other particulate matter that is blowing around on mars has been stalking the rover for years.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Xzavior
originally posted by: luke1212
a reply to: Xzavior
All I see is what looks to be a small rocky hill or montainy terrain top left and right. Don't see any ufo. Or anything at all flying for that matter.
Loot at center left to see UFO
You mean the thing that stationary for 2 frames?
What makes you think it’s a, a ufo and b, stalking the rover?
the voices...aka wishful thought of it being true
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?
originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
On Mars?
Do you have proof that it does?
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?
originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
On Mars?
Do you have proof that it does?
the probability of a flying organism can still be 0%. I was not speaking logic. That is childish thinking you have. If you have ever taking a statistics course like I have then you would agree that I am 100% right.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
no...but scientists have said in past that life may exist on Mars. What life they don't know. So I introduce the probability it could be a bird or fly.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
you have proof otherwise that life doesn't exist on Mars?
originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
On Mars?
Do you have proof that it does?
Ok. By that logic it could be Aladdin, a black unicorn or god poo.
originally posted by: CraftBuilder
This and other particulate matter that is blowing around on mars has been stalking the rover for years. These take to regularly suctioning themselves to the camera optics via mysterious quantum forces.
if you want me to draw up a probability model for you I can. You just have to pay me for my time doing it. How about you research statistics courses and then we talk. The theory behind me speaks for itself.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
Show me the statistics that would make you 100% right.
Or are you on about the likelyhood that, because in other “UFO” images and videos it’s been a bird or a bug, so (somehow) it must be one on Mars too?
P(Bird or Fly) = P(bird) + P(fly) - P(bird and fly)
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
Just because EARTH based images have been birds or bugs, doesn’t mean MARS based images are.
Your “statistics” are flawed.
post note...spoken like someone who hasn't taken post secondary mathematics and probability theory course in statistics. I will pat you on the head.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
Just because EARTH based images have been birds or bugs, doesn’t mean MARS based images are.
Your “statistics” are flawed.
that is also correct and the probability of that could still be 0!!!! Yay we are finally learning probability theory here
originally posted by: SlowNail
a reply to: Skywatcher2011
The most complicated method you could have used to say, "It's not a bird or fly".