Clinton and DNC Paid For Research That Led To Russian Dossier

a reply to: soberbacchus

Please do that thread. With sourcing of course. What parts have the FBI, CIA and NSA confirmed.

I love how the narrative changed once Trump won. Before that, it was assurances no one could hack our election, then poof....Russians everywhere. It's really quite interesting.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus

Please do that thread. With sourcing of course. What parts have the FBI, CIA and NSA confirmed.

I love how the narrative changed once Trump won. Before that, it was assurances no one could hack our election, then poof....Russians everywhere. It's really quite interesting.

Yep. Remember how all of the media and democrats said how dangerous it would be to question the fairness of the election, and how it would hurt our country.

How long ago that seems from the current stories of Russian on facebook and Pokemon stealing the election.

Russian SHILLS and BOTS are out in force over this...

Take a look for yourself at what propaganda they are pushing:

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org...

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: DBCowboy

There is DEFINITIVE proof Hillary/DNC PAID FOR THE HOAX DOSSIER.

And?

What GOP Nominee or ORG originally funded it?

And how does either make the Dossier less or more factual.

Some of the information in the Dossier is also reported by multiple international intelligence agencies.

Corroborated/confirmed info from the dossier was used to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page, who has now refused to testify and taken the 5th.

The Dossier claimed Trump agreed minimize US opposition to Russia's invasion in Ukraine and that was confirmed when JD Gordon and Manafort, presumably at Trump's direction, stripped US Opposition to the invasion from the RNC platform statement.

Apart from that, at least one source for the Dossier has turned up dead, with several other murders suspected of being linked to the Dossier.

We will see, but much of the Dossier appears valid enough to be continued to be investigated.

Fake news.

Low-energy Jeb! dropped out of the race in February 2016.

The gop commissioned opposition research ended in April 2016 and did not involve russia.

Hillary/ DNC did not commission the fabricarion of the phony russia dossier until two months later. Steele became involved in June 2016.

a reply to: Grambler

You sure like to spin spin spin don’t ya.

Tell ya what— you go ahead keep your head in the sand— we all know how Trump supporters will react regardless of the FBIs conclusion - so you do your thing and I’ll wait for the conclusion of the FBI.

The Campaign Legal center filed a complaint today with the FEC that the Clinton team failed to disclsoe how they were spending money as proven by the paying for the Steele dossier.

Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign committee violated campaign finance law. They failed to accurately disclose the purpose and recipient of payments for the dossier of research alleging connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia, effectively hiding these payments from public scrutiny, contrary to the requirements of federal law.

www.campaignlegalcenter.org...

originally posted by: DanteGaland
Russian SHILLS and BOTS are out in force over this...

Take a look for yourself at what propaganda they are pushing:

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org...

Damm Russians made that Lawyer admit he funded the Dossiers after a year of denial. The nerve of them....... This has Putin's fingerprints all over it.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: DanteGaland
Russian SHILLS and BOTS are out in force over this...

Take a look for yourself at what propaganda they are pushing:

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org...

Damm Russians made that Lawyer admit he funded the Dossiers after a year of denial. The nerve of them....... This has Putin's fingerprints all over it.

Meanwhile well some people are concerned with a few rsussian twitter bots, how have the mainstream media been reporting this?

Journalists are downplaying news that the DNC and Clinton campaign were behind the funding of a salacious dossier alleging Trump ties to Russia, which The Washington Post revealed Tuesday.

dailycaller.com...

Many examples given there.

a reply to: Grambler

Its all coming out it seems . I am sure Hillary has a new book in the works called "Now What Happens " ... what a mess . seems also that its not a Hillary thing but a liberal thing www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: RomeByFire

I thought you said it was the gold standard along with the NYT.

It's funny to see all of you shilling the same fake news line. I'm beginning to think you're all bots.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The Trump steaks thing reflects badly on me? It was completely true and a perfect demonstration of what a degenerate Trump is. Same thing with the hair thing. It's only absurd because Trump has insanely thin skin that compels him toward absurd, vexatious litigation.

There was nothing remotely "tabloid" about the Juanita Broadderick OP. It's a point by point breakdown of why I don't believe Juanita Broadderick. What's wrong with that again?

All the rest of them were about what? The tape and accusations of sex assault. You don't take allegations of sexual assault serio—oh wait, YOU DO take them seriously — but only when they're leveled against Bill Clinton. So much so, in fact, that you clearly were sold on the existence of a tape of Bill Clinton raping a 13 year-old. You're no more immune to of disinterested in salacious allegations and sordid affairs than anyone else. You just try to pretend otherwise.

Did you notice that you had to scroll back an entire year to the election to find threads you could argue were somehow "tabloid" in nature? What was your claim again?

Simply calling you out on the endless cavalcade barrage of a tabloid hysteria nuttery stuff, like this damn Dubious Dossier (which is only one tiny example), that's about all I ever do and you all know it, well keep throwing the partisan angles at me knowing them not to be true and keep doing yourselves a disservice.

You're "calling me out" on a 1% or less of my threads authored, from over a year ago, during the election? That's an "endless cavalcade barrage of a tabloid hysteria nuttery stuff?" Well I hope you'll be avoiding any threads about sexual assault, pedophilia or celebrities. Because you know, I'd hate to see you getting your linen suit muddy, wallowing around in that sort of "tabloid nuttery stuff."

originally posted by: DanteGaland
Russian SHILLS and BOTS are out in force over this...

Take a look for yourself at what propaganda they are pushing:

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org...

News Flash: Russia has been perfecting counter intelligence
for a long time now. There is nothing new about it...

Oh and by the way no thanks on your link.

a reply to: LondonMan

Just like they will be soon, those little finger spinner toys
are on sale for10 cents, everyone has one and they
got boring quick.

Well looks like Hillary and the DNC will have to lawyer up
in yet another lawsuit against them for breaking campaign
finance laws.
www.washingtontimes.com...

“By filing misleading reports, the DNC and Clinton campaign undermined the vital public information role of campaign disclosures,” said Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and strategy at CLC and a former FEC official.

“Voters need campaign disclosure laws to be enforced so they can hold candidates accountable for how they raise and spend money. The FEC must investigate this apparent violation and take appropriate action.”

a reply to: JBurns

Holy sh*& batman..That there is some psychotic rant.

Newflash...Their are two GOP led congressional investigations, an independent special counsel and multiple intelligence agency investigations into Trump+Russia cuz their is a sh*&load of smoldering smoke. Flynn, Page, Manafort? Resigned for lying about it. The AG recused himself for lying about. Trump bragged to Russians about squashing the investigation after firing the Head of the FBI. on and on...

Be patient.

Reality will sort you out.

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: DBCowboy

There is DEFINITIVE proof Hillary/DNC PAID FOR THE HOAX DOSSIER.

And?

What GOP Nominee or ORG originally funded it?

And how does either make the Dossier less or more factual.

Some of the information in the Dossier is also reported by multiple international intelligence agencies.

Corroborated/confirmed info from the dossier was used to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page, who has now refused to testify and taken the 5th.

The Dossier claimed Trump agreed minimize US opposition to Russia's invasion in Ukraine and that was confirmed when JD Gordon and Manafort, presumably at Trump's direction, stripped US Opposition to the invasion from the RNC platform statement.

Apart from that, at least one source for the Dossier has turned up dead, with several other murders suspected of being linked to the Dossier.

We will see, but much of the Dossier appears valid enough to be continued to be investigated.

Fake news.

The gop commissioned opposition research ended in April 2016 and did not involve russia.

You do know that is a lie? Right?

Have you read the Steele Dossier? And yes, it was commissioned by GOP up until April when Trump secured the nomination with Cruz suspending his campaign.

a reply to: soberbacchus

Still you ignore the most important thing.

If any political opponent paid a foreign agent for dirt on trump, and then the obelama admin used that info to get fisa warrants, then this is a far bigger scandal than anything russia was accused of.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Still you ignore the most important thing.

If any political opponent paid a foreign agent for dirt on trump, and then the obelama admin used that info to get fisa warrants, then this is a far bigger scandal than anything russia was accused of.

Nope. Paying a private foreign company for intelligence, political or otherwise, is common practice in campaigns and corporate practice. The CIA, NSA, FBI often uses foreign contractors for intelligence.

Colluding with a foreign GOVERNMENT is illegal.

you seem confused.

In other NEWS it looks like Trumps Data Firm was working with ASSANGE.

And because I know this is a special interest of yours..
They lied about what Cambridge Analytica was up to on FEC reports..

DRIP...DRIP..DRIP

Brad Parscale, the campaign’s digital director, told Rebecca Ballhaus of the Wall Street Journal that the “psychographic” firm’s invoices is “mislabeled” in the FEC filing but he didn't elaborate how or why.

The Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica millions for its work. A former Trump campaign staffer previously told The Daily Beast that the firm did very little actual work for the campaign.

...

But FEC data contradicted Glassner. According to the campaign’s own FEC filings, the Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica $5.9 million from July 29, 2016 – a week after Trump formally accepted the Republican Party’s presidential nomination in Cleveland – to December 12, 2016.

Cambridge Analytica is bankrolled by the Mercer Family, Bannon sat on the Board of Directors, Robert Mercer was Trumps bankroll during the election.

Strange they got paid AFTER he secured the nomination and AFTER he won the election?

Yet Trumps Head of Digital can't explain what for?

And admits the FEC filings are false descriptions?

DRIP ..>DRIP...DRIP
The head of Cambridge Analytica said he asked the WikiLeaks founder for help
www.thedailybeast.com...

a reply to: Grambler

How is that important when that never happened?

originally posted by: DanteGaland
Russian SHILLS and BOTS are out in force over this...

Take a look for yourself at what propaganda they are pushing:

dashboard.securingdemocracy.org...

Oh look, a purpose-built website designed to segregate independent thought as Russian-oriented.