It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
I’m proud of Hillary Clinton and the DNC for continuing the funding that the Republicans started.
Money well spent as far as I’m concerned.
Yeaah because it has paid bloody dividends hasn't it..
The strategy of intentionally burning down the house in the hopes the people will then pay them to fix it doesnt work...
originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: Grambler
Made up story?
Which parts of the dossier have been independently verified as "false"?
Do you have any non-biased sources providing a factual basis that the dossier is "made up"?
Do you have any non-disputable, cold, hard facts that prove the dossier is a work of fiction?
I see you and others throwing this claim around all the time, but I don't recall ever seeing any credible, factual, basis for these claims.
This story is utter nonsense, not worthy of a wacky conspiracy theory of an alien invasion.
To offer Trump either the entirety of, or a brokerage commission on, the market value of 19.5% of Rosneft shares—even a 6 percent commission on $12 billion worth of Rosneft shares would amount to an astonishing $720 million—would deplete the cash that Putin desperately needed for military spending and budget deficits, all in return for a promise to lift sanctions if—and what a big “if”—Trump were elected
As first reported by The Washington Times on April 25, Mr. Steele filed a document in a sealed court case in London acknowledging that a major dossier charge about hacking Democrats’ computers was unverified.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RazorV66
You think Hillary Clinton, Criminal Mastermind, paid 10 million dollars for fake information?
I'm sure you have evidence of a) the complete contents of the dossier and b) that the information has been proven fake?
Or did you just want to vent that you don't like Democrats and leftists for yet another time?
#1. Yes, I do believe that she did.
#2. If it's true, what's taking Mueller so long to get Trump?
#3. It's not personal, but I do not apologize for it.....you guys don't apologize for hating everyone.
#1. Nothing about Clinton (or the DNC for that matter) would suggest they are that stupid.
#2. I don't understand that Mueller's investigation is about Trump, but about his Campaign officers and perhaps ties through them to the Trump Organization.
#3. I don't think you'll find a single liberal/progressive/left moderate/left libertarian or Democrat here that "hates" everyone. That's just political rhetoric.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
I’m proud of Hillary Clinton and the DNC for continuing the funding that the Republicans started.
Money well spent as far as I’m concerned.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: loam
There's an important difference.
The sources Steele has are at risk of being killed by Russian GRU/FSB and oligarch thugs. There's a reason he practices opsec just as if he was still working for MI6.
His MI6 career inside Russia likely netted him lots of contacts. Contacts that may even be used by our own CIA.
I can't be sure that our own contacts within the Russian hierarchy are the same ones that Steele has, but if they are -- they're not going to be revealed by him or our own people.
This is more than just some politicians, their aides, and "people close to them". This is international espionage that carries with it real-world life and death risks. This isn't a political game for these people inside Russia who give us intel.
These people aren't TMZ-tabloid gossipers. These sources are carefully curated and cultivated over years, and over time prove themselves to the intelligence agencies they help. Steele has proven himself to be trustworthy to our own FBI for other investigations in the past, and there's little reason to suspect he's a willing participant in some kind of slander or libelous work of fiction.
F the Globalists...
I used to agree. Feels like a long time ago. Now that I’ve seen the alternative... these Trump supporters who embrace and support White Supremacists and walls and their total abandonment of values and principles. The way they spread vile fake news just to gain followers to their hateful and divisive cause...
I’ve now seen the alternative and I’m full onboard with globalism. F* the inbred stunted racist hate. F* the uneducated white nationalists who feed off hate and anger. F* all those people. I’ll take the globalists.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Xcathdra
The DNC is killing itself with it's Clinton loyalty.
They took a huge hit in credibility rigging the 2016 election.
I’m proud of Hillary and the DNC for paying to continue the research into this traitorous campaign. They fought the good fight.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Kettu
Are you seriously still pushing on as if we're to believe a single sentence of of the dodgey dossier?
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: TheScale
They are working overtime as never before.
I see it as an information war, they certainly do have the media in the tank.
Trump's tweets over the next few days will be interesting.