Bill Clinton personally met with Vladimir Putin to get the uranium deal approved

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
While we apparently still don't know whether Bill Clinton was ultimately approved to hold those meetings, his team did confirm that he met with Vladimir Putin at his private residence.

Whoa, just pull on the reins a little bit.

How do we know that they weren't just talking about grandkids, golf, and travel plans?

And vodka, definitely vodka.

a reply to: SlapMonkey

LOL Great minds think alike.

That Bill and Hillary are quite the team, US version of Boris/Natasha.

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
While we apparently still don't know whether Bill Clinton was ultimately approved to hold those meetings, his team did confirm that he met with Vladimir Putin at his private residence.

Whoa, just pull on the reins a little bit.

How do we know that they weren't just talking about grandkids, golf, and travel plans?

And vodka, definitely vodka.

Don't forget cigars. Possibly the one area where Bill could give Putin lessons.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
While we apparently still don't know whether Bill Clinton was ultimately approved to hold those meetings, his team did confirm that he met with Vladimir Putin at his private residence.

Whoa, just pull on the reins a little bit.

How do we know that they weren't just talking about grandkids, golf, and travel plans?

Let's not pull out the Jump To Conclusions Mat.

Talking about family and golf.

They must have met on a tarmac. I hear that's a good place to have those conversations.

Perhaps they also sent emails to each other that they bleach bitted about yoga.

originally posted by: Garmanarnar

originally posted by: Shadys321
How is this “article from 2010” even thread-worthy?

It mentions a Clinton and zerohedge is viewed as trustworthy source around here, it's gold to the knuckle draggers here.

I'll take the wildest thing from Zerohedge over anything that passes over the lips of either one of the Clintons.

Looks like a clear case of lock them up.

originally posted by: ausername
lol you can almost see the devious gears spinning in Putin's head here...

Caption?

Putin: "me too"

originally posted by: Jiggly
a reply to: Shadys321

this article isnt from 2010.... if you cant even read a simple article how can you expect people to take you seriously

Everything the article is explaining pertains to 2010....

Lol you must be a trump fan boi , how kute.

So at the end of the article is this:
"The documents don’t indicate what decision the State Department finally made. But current and former aides to both Clintons told The Hill on Thursday the request to meet the various Russians came from other people, and the ex-president’s aides and State decided in the end not to hold any of the meetings with the Russians on the list."

So the leader of Russia meets with the former leader of the US, and this is suppose to be a scandal?

originally posted by: Regnor
So at the end of the article is this:
"The documents don’t indicate what decision the State Department finally made. But current and former aides to both Clintons told The Hill on Thursday the request to meet the various Russians came from other people, and the ex-president’s aides and State decided in the end not to hold any of the meetings with the Russians on the list."

So the leader of Russia meets with the former leader of the US, and this is suppose to be a scandal?

Well apparently a presidential candidate or his team even meeting with low level Russians is a scandal.

So yes, Bill meeting with putin and then receiving 500 thousand dollars in speaking fees from a Russian bank, while coicindentally Hillary was voting to allow the sell of uranium to Russians seems like a much bigger deal.

a reply to: Iamonlyhuman



I read the whole rather poorly written piece which easily identified it as being from Zero Hedge, which is simply a partisan blog. Can you show me any law or regulation that prohibits a former President from meeting with the leader of another country?

I am pretty sure he doesnt need to ask nor would you or I need to ask. You are simply blinded by Partisan fear and hatred to see thru a crafted story by fellow blinded Partisans.

Does this mean no wrong was committed in this case ? No, but you cant prove money given to a foundation as a charitiable contribution is anything else especially when both parties say it was a charitiable contribution. No matter how many cheap thrid grade level written stories that the Zeros at Zero Hedge make up is going to change that fact.

No more so than the media meditating channeling and chanting RUSSIA; RUSSIA; RUSSIA means that Trump is some sort of closet communist ready to sell out his country. Both stories are nothing more than divide and conquer tactis being used to maintain the status Qo.

Those are the standereds of the day one must reach for scandal.a reply to: Regnor

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Iamonlyhuman



I read the whole rather poorly written piece which easily identified it as being from Zero Hedge, which is simply a partisan blog. Can you show me any law or regulation that prohibits a former President from meeting with the leader of another country?

I am pretty sure he doesnt need to ask nor would you or I need to ask. You are simply blinded by Partisan fear and hatred to see thru a crafted story by fellow blinded Partisans.

Does this mean no wrong was committed in this case ? No, but you cant prove money given to a foundation as a charitiable contribution is anything else especially when both parties say it was a charitiable contribution. No matter how many cheap thrid grade level written stories that the Zeros at Zero Hedge make up is going to change that fact.

No more so than the media meditating channeling and chanting RUSSIA; RUSSIA; RUSSIA means that Trump is some sort of closet communist ready to sell out his country. Both stories are nothing more than divide and conquer tactis being used to maintain the status Qo.

Fine you find both stories ridiculous.

So if there is such a huge investigation of one side, why not the other?

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
While we apparently still don't know whether Bill Clinton was ultimately approved to hold those meetings, his team did confirm that he met with Vladimir Putin at his private residence.

Whoa, just pull on the reins a little bit.

How do we know that they weren't just talking about grandkids, golf, and travel plans?

Let's not pull out the Jump To Conclusions Mat.

You ass! I'm at a takeout place right now and just blurted out laughing!

never mind

originally posted by: Shadys321

originally posted by: Jiggly
a reply to: Shadys321

this article isnt from 2010.... if you cant even read a simple article how can you expect people to take you seriously

Everything the article is explaining pertains to 2010....

Lol you must be a trump fan boi , how kute.

How's that saying go? Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

This is very damaging evidence.

Based on this, the DOJ should hand down indictments immediately.

originally posted by: Phage
This is very damaging evidence.

Based on this, the DOJ should hand down indictments immediately.

Think we'll ever see that Phage?

originally posted by: Phage
This is very damaging evidence.

Based on this, the DOJ should hand down indictments immediately.

Sarcasm?

Given your position on trump and investigations, it's hard to tell.

a reply to: Grambler

Have I advocated for Trump to be indicted?

This is real evidence here, not like that fake stuff about Trump.