The Las Vegas shooting and evidence of some kind of coordination.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

oh right...sorry could have sworn someone said the stairs inside were removed which seemed a bit pointless to me at the time but presumed it was for safety reasons. Wonder why after all this time those towers are still standing and still guarded?

I've read wayyyy too much on this and everything's melding into one !

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

I hear that.

If it makes you feel any better, no one has confirmed there are stairs inside. But it would seem to me there are if there are doors (per Xuenchen's comment). Otherwise, where do the doors lead to? How would the proposed ferris wheel have been accessible for maintainance?

On that note...most ferris wheels are flanked by two-pronged supports on either side. The towers are unusual, period. No clear way to really understand their construction, IMO.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

It's lens flare, the dot rotates around the source of light in the video ox was commenting on. As soon as the guy obstructing the light source moves the orb appears and rotates around the light source in reference to the panning of the camera.

Lens flare is a real phenomenon and happens all the time with cameras which is probably why you keep finding them in videos. Go to any other video outside of the Las Vegas ones and you'll find the same thing in many of them.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I came here to find the truth. Not get insulted by people like you who don't know the first thing about basic lens flares and reflections.

If you are curious as to why I am here, maybe have a look at all my posts in this thread:

my posts in the big thread

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

And :20 seconds in on the side and back of the stage? Where did that light come from?



You may be correct, but I am curious as to why the light appears at that particular time.

I already debunked this silly topic with this video:
streamable.com...

There are more than one "dancing lights" that are in perfect alignment and synchronization with two lights I have circled in blue, and the original camera movement (which is gone because they stabilized the video). This is proof they are internal reflections.

The lights show up in the video right when the camera is at the right angle in relation to the two lights to cause the reflection to shine into the camera sensors.

End topic.

originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I came here to find the truth. Not get insulted by people like you who don't know the first thing about basic lens flares and reflections.

If you are curious as to why I am here, maybe have a look at all my posts in this thread:

my posts in the big thread

Ah. I already took a look at your posting history.

Two bottles of water, some stacked plates, and it's evidence that two people ate off the room service cart.

No one has ever drank two small bottles of water before...evah.

You see evidence of stuff you *want* to see and not where you don't.

Sorry, if I am not sold by your two week posting history. I'm with Phage when I say, "Welcome to ATS."

originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
End topic.

Lovely. End the topic!



Oh, wait...except you aren't a mod. You are brand new here.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Right, nevermind the confirmed legitimate receipt that says number of guests is 2.

I'm with the others here who think this topic is a hilarious highlight of your ignorance of basic photography. What a joke.

originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Right, nevermind the confirmed legitimate receipt that says number of guests is 2.

I'm with the others here who think this topic is a hilarious highlight of your ignorance of basic photography. What a joke.

No. What you wrote was this:

Drinks for two.
Dinner for two.
Salad for two.
Desert for two.

Link

Receipt? No, I don't see that amongst your 'evidence.'

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't post evidence, I posted clues. Get your act together.

originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't post evidence, I posted clues. Get your act together.

You wrote:

Drinks for two.
Dinner for two.
Salad for two.
Desert for two.

While posting THIS pic:



Did/Do you see those things in that pic or not?

Link

***

ETA: Get YOUR act together and YOUR story straight, before you go trying to 'end topics.'

originally posted by: 0x6372756d6273
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Right, nevermind the confirmed legitimate receipt that says number of guests is 2.

I'm with the others here who think this topic is a hilarious highlight of your ignorance of basic photography. What a joke.

What "legitimate receipt"

MGM hasn't confirmed much of anything have they.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Yes, I see two dinner plates, two salad plates, two appetizer/desert plates, and two water bottles. Generally something you see when you order two meals. That cart also has the video camera on it with wires that lead into room 32-134, which was rented beside 32-135 (two rented rooms, with two beds), and two broken windows, and two gun platforms.

You see the theme here?

It's best you stick to the topic. You are barking up the wrong tree. Don't snap at me because you started a stupid topic.

a reply to: 0x6372756d6273

No proof anywhere that confirms that picture with the cart was taken Oct 1st.

But it is cute and very convincing.

a reply to: 0x6372756d6273

Oh? You see plates, not desserts, salads, dinners...two tiny bottles of water that any one person could easily drink during dinner.

But THAT is evidence of two actual dinners, two salads, two deserts err...desserts, in your mind.

You are the one that linked to a stupid comment and have proceeded to tell someone who has contributed far more to this forum than you have in your 96 comment history, that their topic is 'stupid.'

I think that's pretty stupid.


***


ETA: I see what looks like FIVE salad plates, btw. So, five salads then? *eyeroll*

a reply to: xuenchen

You are not very up-to-date are you?

A confirmed employee of Mandalay Bay posted a room service receipt from Stephen Paddock, on the top of the receipt shows the room number, the number of guests (2), and the date he checked in. At first everyone questioned it because the date said Sept. 27th and FBI said he didn't check in until the 28th, but later corrected to the 25th. Giving even more credence to it.

Then recently an independent investigator went to Mandalay Bay and rented a room, and got room service. Confirmed the receipt is identical, and it does indeed show the number of guests on the receipt. In his case it said (1).
www.abovetopsecret.com...

So you were saying?

a reply to: 0x6372756d6273

Between you and xuenchen...I'll take xuenchen on this, any day, and am going to leave it at that.

a reply to: xuenchen

What on Earth are you talking about? That cart is a picture from the FBI. That is the cart that has the video camera on it under a plate that the shooter used to watch the hallway. The wire for the camera can be seen on the cart, and below the cart running into door 32-134. They didn't touch the cart because its crime scene evidence.

See video here

What on Earth is wrong with ATS today.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

What I posted is clues for two person dining. Yes, two dinner plates, and two salad plates, and two desert plates and two drinks usually points to two meals, and two people. This is what a professional investigator would look into, as well as keeping in mind that he was just hungry.

Real investigators don't waste their time on obivious lens flares.