Drones Did Vegas Shooting ⁈ Paddock Deep State IRS LockHeed NASA

a reply to: Asktheanimals

This is a very interesting premise, unfortunately, the chances of me sitting down and watching a 2.5 hour long video, I'm getting picked up for work in little over an hour and, even if I wasn't the kids wouldn't give me peace that long, ha ha.

I'd be very interested to hear some of the more creepy aspects of his investigation though...

a reply to: Reverbs

I did watch that video. I was wondering if it could actually compensate for sustained automatic fire. I sort of doubt it.

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Asktheanimals

This is a very interesting premise, unfortunately, the chances of me sitting down and watching a 2.5 hour long video, I'm getting picked up for work in little over an hour and, even if I wasn't the kids wouldn't give me peace that long, ha ha.

I'd be very interested to hear some of the more creepy aspects of his investigation though...

maybe ill write a summary but so far its random speculation..

@domo1

you might be right.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

The conspiracy in the video is many times more elaborate than the current narrative. To my mind, the level of absurdity in 'Strontium Milk's' version doesn't make a whole lot of sense. His explanations lack the rationale of reasoning authorities imo.

A shady group could seek to test their drones in live theatres like Afghanistan if they were really ruthless. A simpler rationale would be to run tests on herd animals at locations hidden from the public. In contrast, flying the drones in darkness and blindly firing into a crowd would seem to offer far less useful information. On top of that problem is their guaranteed anonymity. Why bother creating a patsy when the argument being made is the drones (and the group behind them) are in and out without trace?

The guy's closing summary about the drones replacing infantry doesn't strengthen the plot either. It's been a dream of many decades to have technology replace humans in war. Drones, ICBMs and satellites are arguably good examples of technology doing what people used to do. It doesn't therefore follow that these drones required testing on a crowd of civilians before they can be used in a real theatre of war. Tech will replace soldiers without sinister massacres, right?

originally posted by: Domo1

Why would they test these things on civilians at home? We're not exactly short on enemies and remote locations in some sandy place would be a far better area.

I hear you, this is my problem with this too. Any new military hardware, surely would be tested on enemy combatants?

On the subject of drones, I've been wondering for a while now how long it will be before one radical group or another flies an SMG equipped drone into a busy urban sprawl and unleashes hell. I don't think it's a case of if but when...

originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Reverbs

I did watch that video. I was wondering if it could actually compensate for sustained automatic fire. I sort of doubt it.

I don't know much about drones but I would assume one being able to sustain fully automatic gunfire would be nigh on impossible. A burst of 3 might be easier to dampen...

a reply to: djz3ro

around 37 minutes.. a woman who was there and her friend next to her is shot. sounds like shes calling into a radio station.

she and her friend are facing with their right sides to mandalay bay. She asks the question " if the bullet that hit her came from mandalay bay how did it enter her stomach? It would have had to make a 90 degree left turn to do that"

only interesting bit so far.

oh and creepy FBI guy of course. If they arent covering anything up it does appear that FBI is in control of the narrative. Almost like local police are sidelined.


open door alarm being discussed at 44 minutes.. main narrator says hes been to these hotels a lot and has left his door open a lot without having anyone check on him.. of course that surrounds the weirdness of the timeline in relation to the security guard..

I do believe the FBI guy gives a tell that when the super nervous under sherriff is answering about multiple shooters.. Even the under sherriff answer doesnt deny multiple shooters.. he answers instead "we have no evidence of other shooters IN HIS ROOM."

around 54 or so the guy is claiming that the door key to the suspects room was used when the car was no longer in the parking deck.. i havnt heard of this elsware nor do I kbow if its factual.


around 64 minutes we have his ocd like behaviors being pointed out. his allergy driven quirks and in his own words " i always where black sweats of nylon or polyester and always black flip flops."
I agree it shows him as being ocd or something close to it.. im being assured this matters later in the video.....

around 77 minutes its about how paddock booked two rooms in chicago during the music show.
guy in video speculates that its a young girlfriend wanting to see music festival and brings her friends.. That sounds random as hell to me..
he never stayed in the hotel rooms..

around 80 minutes suspect used air bnb to book place at another music festival.. guy thinks its a young girlfriend again.. books three rooms there.. starting 5 days before festival..

taking a break note

to me this is just showing premeditation most likely..

The most interesting thing presented is the very likelihood that Marilou Danley works/worked for Janet Air. It does seem super plausible and is intriguing for sure.

a reply to: Reverbs

Around 140 minutes he gives his overall idea..

I feel the drone idea is weak and is coming out of thin air.. let's say people reported strange drone like noises?? Something to start with..


So while I find this particular video kind of weak, things are off and until I get it right in my head, I'm having major trust issues on this one.

Rhetorical question:
How many think a single 64 year old man could kill 58 and wound over 500 people in the space of 14 minutes at a distance of 4 -500 yards?

If you missed it I think this video proves the case for multiple shooters at the event which if true negates anything coming from the LV Sheriff's Dept. -

a reply to: Asktheanimals

I was in the Army so maybe I have a different idea of what is possible with small arms fire from a high elevation.

Someone was helping though..

I'm more concerned with a motive.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Shooting into a crowd of that many people and confined into a small area, yeah very easily accomplished by a 64 year old man.

That said, not sure what his age has to do with anything.

I mean as long as he has the strength to pull a 6lb trigger, which I am sure he did.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

I build quad and hex copters. Never built an octo yet although i have plans for one. An octo could be stable enough to shoot from, but you would hear it a mile away. They are as loud as a real helo, and there is no way to silence the beating/chopping of the air.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

I don't think his age could prohibit him from pulling this off.

originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: Asktheanimals

I was in the Army so maybe I have a different idea of what is possible with small arms fire from a high elevation.

Someone was helping though..

I'm more concerned with a motive.

Yeah, me too. I am also concerned with what the investigators have not said yet. Such as a description of the wounds, Analysis of the trajectory of the bullets. And the type of round used.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

That video was good but he makes a bad assumption and maybe I'm not up with the case but he assumes every round is a .223 55 grain..

Then bases the second shooter on different bullet velocities.. what if someone at the same location switched to 7.62?? It's a much slower round at 450 yards.

7.62 is actually probably too slow to fit but why didn't he consider it?? Did the FBI say what all of the brass found in the hotel room was? Did it all belong to 5.56 or .223 ??

a reply to: Domo1

To me it looks like a terror attack happened, and the FBI is scrambling to make it look like it wasn't from outside the US.

I think Paddock is the fall guy here. He has been in and out of southeast Asia, the new hotbed for Muslim growth and militant action. Everything about him screams arms dealer. And when it went south with whoever he was meeting with...the FBI came in to blur the scene as much as they could so they didn't look like morons.

I have zero faith in the FBI. The majority of their antiterror activity seems to be luring mentally retarded boys into terror schemes that they have devised.

Yeah really this is way off base as a theory, just because of the fact our government would never and has never tested anything harmful on civilians or our military boys would never happen! No way would they "test" anything on civilians like this.

Thanks for posting this. Not sure I buy all/any of it, but a lot of it actually makes sense connections wise. The comparisons to areas where there has been military coups, and civil unrest are kinda creepy and would make this drone technology important if "They" thought people might be getting ready to kick up a real fuss over what's been going on.

The speculation a lot here have been making on how nervous the cops are and how creepy the FBI guy is with the cops. Paddock's motive, what motive? The crime scene, Campos, His girlfriend, the brothers weird behavior, the jacked up timeline, the sound bites, all of it.

This ties it all together a bit for sure.

But seriously it would only take 2 or maybe 3 people max coming in on a Janet flight, with the drone in the plane, wait for it to be the right time, grab their stuff, set up, shoot it up, grab drone, get back on plane as soon as they stop shooting and wait till morning and back to base.

As for the noise the drone made. "Helicopters" were heard and also, concert, then screaming, and would you still hear it clearly if it was 1200 feet or so away? The drone sound thing is the main point that makes me doubt his theory. Those buggers are loud!


This definitely raises a ton more questions, but could be on the right track in places. I don't think he's got the full story right though, but maybe some of it. A lot of the connections are suspicious though. Who knows? None of us that's for sure. Yet, if ever.

Here's the promo video for the drone company that won 100k in a DoD tech contest.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
The only problem I have with the arms dealer story is, the guns were all legally bought and in his name. Have you ever heard of an arms dealer doing that? I personally think he had weapons because he was going to the gun show or something along those lines.

Also the Video made a lot of connections to his patterns that he had followed for decades. There are a lot of deviations to those patterns in the last year, so maybe that points to him being converted or something?

This is from 5 yrs ago I think.

youtu.be...