Drones Did Vegas Shooting ⁈ Paddock Deep State IRS LockHeed NASA

This will be a lengthy post but I assure you that it will put together ALL of the pieces that have been missing from the puzzle of the Las Vegas shooting. The 2 & 1/2 hour video at the bottom is an interview with Vin Armani, who is far and away the only real researcher to put together EVERYTHING connected to not only the shooting but Paddock, Marilou Danley and even the management of MGM. Watch it all if you want to understand what happened and how. Armani has some very creepy information which has led him to shocking and insightful conclusions. I truly believe he has nailed this down and what lies at the bottom is incredibly evil and corrupt. Las Vegas will not be another 9/11 with the public left scratching their heads about how and why so many Americans died.

INSIDER TRADING
To begin let's discuss the financial dealings of MGM CEO James Murren who sold 80% of his company stock in the month preceeding the shooting. Murren and other MGM officers were selling their stock after MGM Resorts International had initiated a $1 Billion share repurchase program on September 5th. Not only were the MGM owners selling off their own stock but George Soros took out a put option for $ 42 million dollars betting MGM shares would fall in price.
www.zerohedge.com...

Proof: This table just shows some of that activity but it's all there should you want to see what he and other officers of the company were doing -www.nasdaq.com...

WHAT HAPPENED AT THE CONCERT?
After seeing all the inconsistencies in the Las Vegas shooting I was looking very seriously towards the use of helicopters since much of the testimony given by the survivors indicated shots from multiple directions (and thus multiple shooters) but videos showed a strange absence of bullet ricochets and a lack of visible bullet strikes. Given the amount of concrete and metal there should have been many of both. This has led many to theorize that it was all a hoax, understandable given all the other conflicting information but that would be very, very wrong. Dozens died and hundreds were wounded although it does appear there have been a few deliberate poorly photoshopped victim pictures thrown out to further confuse matters.

WHERE DID THE SHOTS COME FROM?
Every video of the crowd during the shooting has people looking everywhere trying to figure out where the shots are coming from. In addition the sound of the gunfire varies drastically in volume and the sound of helicopter or drone rotors are also evident. The advantages of shooting down from above include the difficulty in establishing the direction of the shots by sound, a lack of ricocheting bullets and bullets going down in to the ground leaving little trace upon entry. People would not be looking up in the air for a shooter or shooters but there is much more. This festival just so happened next to an airport, not just any airport but one with an airline called JANET airlines

A highly classified small fleet of passenger aircraft known as "Janet" is operated for the United States Air Force to transport military and contractor employees. It mainly serves the Nevada National Security Site (most notably Area 51 and TTR), from their terminal at Las Vegas' McCarran International Airport

en.wikipedia.org...(airline)

There is some information connecting Marilou Danley not only to the CIA, but to Janet Air, this is all discussed in the video at great length.

Let's look at a map and see JANET airlines is located in the bottom right corner, bottom left corner is Mandalay Bay Hotel, the concert venue is circled in orange with stage a blue rectangle. I have drawn a purple line from the shooters window to the concert and made a green rectangle around the aviation fuel tanks which were struck with bullets.


Runways were shut down, flights cancelled for hours after the shooting ended. JANET was the perfect location for a drone test utilizing various military calibers, .223 or , 5.56 x 45 NATO, 7.62 x 39 (Russian) and .308 - a common choice for sniper rifles. A top secret military area, easily concealed from view where drones could be brought in by plane and removed, a place where even the FBI could not enter to investigate if they wanted.

If you still believe the ever-changing narrative after watching the entire video by all means let's discuss why.
* I don't seem able to fix the time code in the link, you'll need to rewind to start the video at the beginning.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

This is awesome. Utterly awesome. Holy #.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Dude.. I can't wait to jump into this. For now I must be off, but will be back later.

To those who say no such drone exists:

You only need to prove one deep state operation.

After that ... all hell will break loose.

The ramifications of one being proven will have all of the previous ones being properly investigated.

Time perhaps for the majority of US Citizens to wake the freaking hell up!

P

I wasn't going to post this but here's a shorter version minus the MGM financial and personal details of Danley and Paddock. If this gets your interest please watch the longer version, I assure you it is worth it for putting it all together.

a reply to: pheonix358

I think he has it nailed down absolutely, this is also why they keep feeding the public ever-changing details and variations on the narrative to lead everyone away from the real answers. Notice how little they have told us about the types of wounds suffered by victims, the calibers they were shot with, how the window was broken in the hotel room etc. First it a crazy guy, then he's on valium, now its ISIS on and on and on until we throw up our hands in frustration and forget about it when the next disaster comes along.

I saw a video of Utah air guard reserves parachuetting at night - totally dark except for a marker light for the crowd to watch them descend. They were able to all land in a small target area in total darkness. Since this was right next to an airport and there is a helicopter tour company about 1/2 mile away, and now the Janet company as well, people could jump above the crowd easily.

They could have staggered parachuters every 30 seconds and each had a magazine (maybe with a bag to catch empty brass) or two to empty on the way down. They could land on roof tops of "accomidating" hotels or at a closed business like Janet.


Another idea I had was that they could have landed on a hotel roof to enter for the shooting.

Of course these are pretty implausible, but this is a CT forum...

Army? Arms dealer? This part of the interview with his brother is pretty strange.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I think that is a very plausible explanation. Use black parachutes and have nothing shiny on your gear. Definitely possible but the video breaks down the drone development, the companies involved etc and the timing would be right for a live fire test on human subjects. JANET airlines has a tall wall and is guarded by military security, top secret so even the FBI couldn't investigate it. The circumstances surrounding the runway closures, stoppage of flights and some details about a supposedly broken fence all fit the narrative he lays out.

Without forensic proof the best we could do is piece together information from those wounded who were able to describe their wounds, where they were when hit and the attitude of their bodies. This could at least form a picture of where the shots were coming from and many accounts were saying it was people on the South side (closer to the airport) that were being hit the most.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

It is definitely easy at this point to clearly see there is a criminal conspiracy linked to this tragedy, and the worst part is that authority figures are much involved in the crimes along side the rest of this.

M'kay. But why? I'll watch the video, but I just want to throw this out there because that seems like the biggest question.

Why waste resources, why target civilians, why risk doing it with drones when you could just set up a fall guy, limit the amount of people that would need to be in the know, not have to rely on newer technology etc...?

For a gun grab? Still way easier to do it the old fashioned way. The timing is also ridiculous. It would be one of the worst times in history to try to pull off a gun grab with the government shaped the way it currently is.

The theories are getting more and more far fetched. I suppose that makes sense considering they really haven't told the public much at all. All the conflicting stuff is the same crap you see with every single mass shooting. It happens EVERY time. There's always going to be a ton of confusion, especially at first.

Why would they test these things on civilians at home? We're not exactly short on enemies and remote locations in some sandy place would be a far better area.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Which means at this point their job is to make the public believe the lone gunman theory (again?!).
Not many are buying it so most are just giving up on ever getting real answers.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

JANET airlines has a tall wall and is guarded by military security, top secret so even the FBI couldn't investigate it.

I wasn't aware that the FBI was unable to investigate things with a Top Secret clearance, I tried to find a source, but it's been a long day and for some reason my searching wasn't very productive.

NVM, found it:

Top Secret Clearances
A Top Secret clearance may be granted to those persons who have a "need-to-know" national security information, classified up to the Top Secret level, and who need unescorted access to FBI facilities, when necessary. This type of clearance will most often be appropriate for law enforcement officers assigned to FBI Task Forces housed in FBI facilities.

That's them granting Top Secret clearance to local police departments...

Link to the FBI site

In addition to all the requirements at the Secret level, a background investigation, covering a 10-year time period, is required.

Once favorably adjudicated for a Top Secret security clearance, the candidate will be required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement.

I will say it might be interesting if people were selling off stock. I want to look into that a bit more too, but Im assuming the answer as to why they did will be pretty mundane. It also seems a little too obvious to be selling off your stock right before your false flag. I never understand how these people are so genius and stupid at the same time.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Really?? So you think Vin Armani has cracked the case here???

He's got zero evidence of anything, is using Wikipedia and movie references and pure speculation and random guess work and statements and opinions for his material.

In fact for the most part his main body of working material is just all the stuff he doesn't know. All the questions and holes.

I mean who is this guy even??? He doesn't have any information at all. I doubt what he does have is even all correct either.

Even this youtube video is edited like crap, yet this is the guy that has it all figured out?? He's the one to crack the Deep State Conspiracy network funded by the black government budget??? LOL

You can't be serious??

I'm not saying all the MSM is the answer either, but this guy doesn't even have a sound theory for anything so far.

a reply to: Domo1

Risk.
Risk of discovery is minimized by using this environment.
Risk of losing a drone is about nil, teams were standing by to grab one should it crash.
They could have all been tested without ever leaving Janet air, if it crashed it would fall on their property making for easy retrieval.
Weapons are always tested on living subjects before deployment in theatre.
Michael Chertoff runs the company who sells the backscatter tech used at airports.
TSA would love to make everyone go through scanning at not just ever event but every public building, bus, trains, etc.
Billions are to be made just on these machines.
There are also elements of a mass ritual sacrifice which are self-evident.
We already know the military industrial complex is not interested in the health and general well-being of the public.
I could go on but you already know what else I'd add.
I haven't started a conspiracy thread for quite a while, this one I couldn't allow to pass by without my fellow ATS members having the chance to review it for themselves.

Thanks for the reply Domo.

a reply to: mOjOm

Nor have you had time to watch the entire video.
It's one of those where the pieces don't fall together until you're 2 hours in.
Yes, it's a theory.
I doubt the FBI is going to hand over the evidence to the general public so it's doubtful it can be proven.
If they did they would be handing us the rope to hang them with.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

I said, I'm only like half through it. But it's pretty weak and totally unsupported.

But if the FBI isn't letting any real info out about anything how would this guy, this nobody citizen and his guesswork come close to anything solid??

But, I don't want to ruin your, fun I guess you could call it. Have at it. But you're wasting your time IMO.

Just listening to this guy ramble on is almost too much for me to listen to. Does he even sound remotely credible to you??? Seriously??

a reply to: Asktheanimals

First off, I don't want to come off as snide or anything, if I sound that way with some of my questions, it's not intentional. I'm asking because I don't know, not because I'm trying to be a jerk.

Second, this is one of those times where I actually DO think something fishy is going on, and I generally think the official story makes the most sense. My gut instinct is that someone somewhere dropped the ball and there is some scrambling behind the scenes.

Risk.
Risk of discovery is minimized by using this environment.

I mean I guess I can see that in some ways. I'm thinking it would be difficult to hide the muzzle flashes at night. I'm also wondering just how well those drones would do on full auto or bump fired.

To me it seems like you would need more people involved using drones. You have to get them there, I'm assuming the theory goes that there is more than one, you have to make sure no cameras are pointing up, you have to get rid of people at the airport (which probably wouldn't be hard for the JANET area), would have to make sure no one was taking off because people look out the windows and would notice muzzle flashes. Drones are loud, I'm assuming these would be too given the payload. You would have to convince a lot of doctors, the ME and other medical professionals not to say anything, and they would probably be able to tell the angles were way off (then again I suppose if you flew the drones at the same height and distance that covers ballistics. I'm sure there are a ton of other things I'm not thinking of.

Seems way easier to convince one guy to shoot up the crowd "for the greater good" and set up dude. It seems more plausible to me that the guy was just a nutcase, but we're being conspiracy people right now.

Michael Chertoff runs the company who sells the backscatter tech used at airports.
TSA would love to make everyone go through scanning at not just ever event but every public building, bus, trains, etc.
Billions are to be made just on these machines.

This actually makes sense to me. I think the government would LOVE to be able to scan everyone all the time and get the population more and more used to it.

There are also elements of a mass ritual sacrifice which are self-evident.

I didn't really read up on that. Because it was a harvest festival theme? Is there any correlation between harvest time and mass shootings to help support that theory? It would be interesting to have someone plot points of strange shootings etc. with the calendar.

I could go on but you already know what else I'd add.

I'd appreciate it anyway.

I haven't started a conspiracy thread for quite a while, this one I couldn't allow to pass by without my fellow ATS members having the chance to review it for themselves.

It certainly is an interesting theory.

a reply to: Domo1


It may help for you to watch some of the video as that seems to be the main focus of the thread. I'm 16 minutes in and we have a drone that carries what looks like any small arms including grenade launchers.. it adjusts for the tork of the weapon like a suspension system and appears to stay on target even when firing..

It's already in service.

That should answer your question "Is the drone thing even possible?"

I personally think it's a retarded idea as drones would probably be pretty noisy and I imagine Simone would have heard it and wondered why are there all these drones??

But I'll watch more of the video anyway and see how I feel later..