It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The White House announced late this evening that it "cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments" to insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act, a decision Democrats condemned as a "spiteful act" that would hike premiums.
President Donald Trump has said he was considering cutting off the cost-sharing reduction payments, which reimburse insurers for lowering out-of-pocket costs for customers, in order to increase pressure on lawmakers to repeal the ACA, also known as Obamacare.
"Based on guidance from the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that there is no appropriation for cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under Obamacare," the White House said in a statement.
"In light of this analysis, the Government cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments,” the White House statement said.
originally posted by: carewemust
Thursday, October 12, 2017
The illegal taxpayer-funded monthly subsidy (CSR) payments to health insurance companies are being terminated..
The White House announced late this evening that it "cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments" to insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act, a decision Democrats condemned as a "spiteful act" that would hike premiums.
President Donald Trump has said he was considering cutting off the cost-sharing reduction payments, which reimburse insurers for lowering out-of-pocket costs for customers, in order to increase pressure on lawmakers to repeal the ACA, also known as Obamacare.
"Based on guidance from the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that there is no appropriation for cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under Obamacare," the White House said in a statement.
"In light of this analysis, the Government cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments,” the White House statement said.
Full Article at: www.nbcnews.com...
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: carewemust
Thursday, October 12, 2017
The illegal taxpayer-funded monthly subsidy (CSR) payments to health insurance companies are being terminated..
The White House announced late this evening that it "cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments" to insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act, a decision Democrats condemned as a "spiteful act" that would hike premiums.
President Donald Trump has said he was considering cutting off the cost-sharing reduction payments, which reimburse insurers for lowering out-of-pocket costs for customers, in order to increase pressure on lawmakers to repeal the ACA, also known as Obamacare.
"Based on guidance from the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that there is no appropriation for cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under Obamacare," the White House said in a statement.
"In light of this analysis, the Government cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments,” the White House statement said.
Full Article at: www.nbcnews.com...
-CareWeMust
Hmmm - how can it be illegal when it was included in the LAW that was passed and upheld repeatedly by the courts? He's making s**t up as he goes.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: carewemust
Thursday, October 12, 2017
The illegal taxpayer-funded monthly subsidy (CSR) payments to health insurance companies are being terminated..
The White House announced late this evening that it "cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments" to insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act, a decision Democrats condemned as a "spiteful act" that would hike premiums.
President Donald Trump has said he was considering cutting off the cost-sharing reduction payments, which reimburse insurers for lowering out-of-pocket costs for customers, in order to increase pressure on lawmakers to repeal the ACA, also known as Obamacare.
"Based on guidance from the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that there is no appropriation for cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under Obamacare," the White House said in a statement.
"In light of this analysis, the Government cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments,” the White House statement said.
Full Article at: www.nbcnews.com...
-CareWeMust
Hmmm - how can it be illegal when it was included in the LAW that was passed and upheld repeatedly by the courts? He's making s**t up as he goes.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
What a tool Trump is.
Well, I suppose the good news is that Trump is going to force premiums so high that we'll end up with Single Payer as soon as he's removed from office.
This reading means that federal subsidies are available to all eligible Americans who comply with the Act’s individual mandate by buying health insurance through an exchange.
The contrary reading would have meant that those who did so in states that had not set up their own exchanges would lose their coverage, and very soon be forced to drop it. “So without the tax credits, the coverage requirement would apply to fewer individuals. And it would be a lot fewer.” Roberts cited figures suggesting that up to 87 percent of exchange customers would lose subsidies.
He made clear as he did so that this reading was the correct one as a matter of law—not an administrative interpretation that could be changed by a hypothetical Republican administration.
In other words, for better or worse, the ACA is now part of federal law, to be uprooted, if at all, only by a full congressional vote to repeal and, possibly, to override a presidential veto.
Roberts also refused to duck responsibility for making an interpretive choice, rather than simply following the words of the statute. Both parties before the Court—the right-wing challengers represented by the conservative attorney Michael Carvin, and the federal government, represented by Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, had argued that the statute was clear. But it wasn’t, and Roberts said so. The phrase “established by a State,” he wrote, could mean either “such exchange,” state or federal, or “only a state exchange.”
originally posted by: carewemust
Actually, Trump is doing what he can to partially fulfill his campaign promise to repeal ObamaCare. You'd really go ballistic if ObamaCare was actually repealed!
originally posted by: Dudemo5
What a tool Trump is.
Well, I suppose the good news is that Trump is going to force premiums so high that we'll end up with Single Payer as soon as he's removed from office.
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: carewemust
If you can now
1. Not pay any tax penalty.
and
2. Buy your own (non-ACA-compliant) insurance from whomever you like without government interference.
The rest doesn't even matter.
The Dragon is slain.
The GOP turncoats in Congress won’t repeal ObamaCare. But Donald Trump — who is admittedly a moron, an anti-speech thug, and otherwise a generally wretched and narcissistic waste of oxygen — is accomplishing some really good stuff on the health care front.