Tom DeLonge Anouncement: October 11th 9:00 AM PST/12:00 PM EST

a reply to: joelr

That also depends on if he went over his data limit on his phone and how many pay per views he bought.

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: SacredLore


Can anyone point to anything he says on his official TTS website that indicates this money sucking 'project' has the intention of disclosing the presence of ET on Earth?

Nope! He's using the gullible UFO crowd to build his dream of becoming the next Star Wars enterprise. Nothing in his business plan mentions "disclosure."

Great video!

What DO you expect the US government to do??

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: SacredLore

With that amount of ex-spooks, this has got to by a psy-op.

Bingo. Anyone that believes anything coming from this "team" is in for some rethinking and self evaluation, after they realize they've been had of course.
Same old song and dance. The intelligence community found a great one in DeLonge, at least for the moment. This will be a monumental fail IMO. On all ends.
Memo to everyone: The government is not as smart as some seem to think they are (regarding UFOs/UAPs...whatever you wish to call them)

originally posted by: SacredLore
Great video!

What DO you expect the US government to do??

I'll admit, I'm still optimistic about this. I think something new is going to come of it. It's too much bother simply to be an effort to discredit a field of study already totally discredited. We'll see.

a reply to: CamoDude9

Do you see any movement on disclosure at all?


STILL want to shoot a black triangle with a .50 cal and see who responds... I will be defending my airspace.

a reply to: justwokeup

That is pretty much my attitude, too: If we get pictures from any branch of the US army of an unidentified object that displayed unexplicable manoeuvering and an official statement along these lines "yes, we have observed this, cannot explain it and we think it is intelligently controlled" then we are a BIG step further. If this is all we get from this project, I would be happy. Anything more is a (possibly huge) bonus.

Some people here behave like they invented the term "disclosure", but fail to provide a workable definition. To some "disclosure" seems to mean "kill everybody who has a different view of the world". Not my definition. But the above paragraph describes what I would find a good enough start. And, looking at the people around me, I think this would already give many people a lot to digest. I completely understand why a responsible person would opt for a gradual approach to disclosure.

And, yes, the project is NOT about disclosure, but seems to be about introduction of new technologies. If we would really get the technology to reduce the effect of gravity or to provide cleaner energy, then again that would be good enough for me. In that case I would not even need any proof about the existence of UAP to be satisfied with the project.

Yes I’m also pretty positive about the whole thing. No we don’t have anything yet - and something is promised imminently - but in terms of how long everyone has waited for ‘the next step’ I don’t think there’s a need to be too impatient here.

If it was me with the letters after my name and a career in the alphabet agencies, then I wouldn’t even attend a preliminary meeting unless there was something tangible to the project, let alone front it and broadcast it to the world. As justwokeup said, why discredit a subject that’s been pounded to death for decades...it wouldn’t make sense.

I’ve been following Hal Puthof on and off for the best of 20 years and I think his department holds the greatest potential, utilising quantum physics to harness a potential we’re yet to see en mass.

I thought he was going to relate some video proof this past week. What's happening with his tease to release proof?

a reply to: thepixelpusher

This douchebro is just another charlatain trying to cash in.

I'd rather pay Greer for one of his alien encounters where you see a bugs in a field than give this douchenozzle a cent.

Scam Alert.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
I thought he was going to relate some video proof this past week. What's happening with his tease to release proof?

No. It's going to come via the community of interest website which is in work. He teased a piece about it on his Facebook page with a screenshot of a webpage. It was taken down shortly after, suspect he was told to stop being an idiot by his partners.

While up the post described what's coming is videos, transcripts, interviews with pilots, background on types of imaging device used for the videos and evidence of a chain of custody for the video.

a reply to: justwokeup

I believe his last post on this subject on twitter said "Not this week, but next". This was posted on like Mon/Tues of this week. I hadn't seen a timeframe given before that, just "soon".

I want to believe him, I want this to work, I want the field to progress by his efforts. I'm just at the point where I'm not believing anything from him until I see it.

If he releases something game-changing (hell, even interesting), I'll give him all the credit in the world.

Until then, just watching curiously from the sidelines.

~Winter

originally posted by: Winterpain
a reply to: justwokeup

I believe his last post on this subject on twitter said "Not this week, but next". This was posted on like Mon/Tues of this week. I hadn't seen a timeframe given before that, just "soon".

I want to believe him, I want this to work, I want the field to progress by his efforts. I'm just at the point where I'm not believing anything from him until I see it.

If he releases something game-changing (hell, even interesting), I'll give him all the credit in the world.

Until then, just watching curiously from the sidelines.

~Winter

Wise, I think the issue is he's not responsible for any of the actual work. He's the celebrity face of the effort but not actually delivering the content. As such he can't keep to any timelines he comes out with, it's not within his power. A wiser man, one used to dealing with bureacracy would have learned to shut up and just deliver what he's given when it's ready. Sadly, he's not learning.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7 STILL want to shoot a black triangle with a .50 cal and see who responds...

that might end badly.

a reply to: RoScoLaz5



i dont think much would happen, it would be a hard target to hit, heck ducks are hard to hit with a shotgun.


but if you wouldn't shoot at a chopper dont shoot at these, youll just be shooting your own team(provided you are american)

Theres a story out there about one guy who actually did shoot at one hovering over his boat. After a minute or a few shots a hatch opened up and a guy yelled out "will you please stop shooting at us!!" thats the guys story.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

must have not had countermeasures on. i can think of a few tricks it would have had to hide itself from a random boater

Yesterday George Knapp tweeted about Delonge's project :

"Remember the October announcement made by rocker Tom Delonge and his team of former government insiders? Stay tuned."

Maybe something is imminent. George doesn't fling around BS

a reply to: penroc3

Maybe the guy had a cold or something obstructing his sinuses?

Colm Kelleher is on Tom team considering his connections to Bigelow Aerospace, i changing a bit this may not be hoax?. Bigelow is building out of space stuff for Nasa and the Department of Defense .